Who says bribery isn't tolerated? I'm sure we can work something out...![]()
Hey, get your bat out of my gig.

Who says bribery isn't tolerated? I'm sure we can work something out...![]()
I'm sure my take will be interpreted as "negative" but I 'm not too impressed by this win. It took Salmons finally showing up to do it and they still tried their hardest to give the game away in the 4th with stupid mistakes. It wasn't a convincing win.
Give what a rest? If you have a problem with me, I suggest you use the ignore function because I ain't changing.
Looks like an engine hoist actually. Get it now?![]()
I'm sure my take will be interpreted as "negative" but I 'm not too impressed by this win. It took Salmons finally showing up to do it and they still tried their hardest to give the game away in the 4th with stupid mistakes. It wasn't a convincing win.
This win may do more harm than good. Reasons:
-Keeps John Salmons as a starter alive for a few more games
-Lets Thornton off the hook for chucking and degrading the progress the rest of the team had made in team offense
-A lot of bad defense again
-Change in rotation seems odd. I was fine with Outlaw not playing. Fine with Jimmer getting some time.
I think the team actually played better versus Utah and then broke down in the end. This is a game versus a Blazers team that is awful on the road and it was still nearly thrown away.
your posts are really starting to make me laugh. and i don't say that sarcastically. i mean it. i think you're legitimately funny, though i imagine it is an unintentional brand of funny. really, you strike me as the kinda guy who would have argued that the world was flat until you were blue in the face...
any win against a playoff team is a good win when you're a basement dweller, no matter how "convincing." young, ****ty teams don't exude confidence without cause. they have to claw, scrape, and ugly-ball their way outta losing streaks. its healthy, because not every game is going to come easy. if you learn how to win the close, ugly ones, it gets a lot easier to win the games you actually should win...
Why? This is a forum and he is simply stating how he feels. This person is very much down to Earth and we CERTAINLY need people like that around here. You know, the "realistic" folks like that![]()
Never defend a witch, or you'll be tried as a witch yourself.
I think the team actually played better versus Utah and then broke down in the end. This is a game versus a Blazers team that is awful on the road and it was still nearly thrown away.
I'm sure my take will be interpreted as "negative" but I 'm not too impressed by this win. It took Salmons finally showing up to do it and they still tried their hardest to give the game away in the 4th with stupid mistakes. It wasn't a convincing win.
The Utah game may have been better, but this is the third solid competitive game in a row we've played, we've got our guys back mostly, and we have 3 weak opponents coming up. This thing may be turning.
I would like to have heard the Portland announcers, they constantly trash this team, as if their team is winning an NBA title anytime soon. Portland is very inconsitent, and basically take advantage of having a fortress for a home court, like the Jazz. I give the Jazz credit though, they play good team basketball with really no star to speak of. Good win for us tonight with defense. We won with none of our stars having great games.
That's fine. I'm not at all worried about how I'm perceived by others. It's beyond my control. It's fine that you feel "any win against a playoff team is a good win when you're a basement dweller" but why do you need others to feel that way as well?
because you're the only one who seems to feel differently.
but your devil's advocate schtick as i've perceived it is approaching garish self-parody...
but it should be noted that all of the facts as presented in warhawk's post above are spot on.
You're really making it easy, you know. Quit stirring the pot or face the consequences ... again.
"I'm sure my take will be interpreted as "negative" but I 'm not too impressed by this win. It took Salmons finally showing up to do it and they still tried their hardest to give the game away in the 4th with stupid mistakes. It wasn't a convincing win."
I'm confused about how the above quote would elicit your response. It seems rather bland to me.
Yes very good win agaisnt a hard nosed physical VETERAN team. The Kings played very good defense except for a couple of lapses where the Blazers got loose for back door cuts and a couple drives to the hoop. Having the GOOD Salmons and Hayes back on the court together gives much needed defense and veteran leadership.
A note to the naysayers: If you are not going to accept "excuses" after the losses, why make them after a win?Enjoy the win.
KB