[Grades] Grades v. Blazers 11/13/2012

What to do with Jimmer next game?

  • Bench PG over Brooks

    Votes: 12 24.0%
  • Starting PG next to Reke (or possibly SG next to Reke)

    Votes: 30 60.0%
  • Starting PG next to Thornton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Starting SG next to IT

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Bench SG...in a ridiculous smallball lineup?

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Stay deep bench

    Votes: 6 12.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
1) Hurry back big guy!

2) Calm the bleep down, 'cause we need you. Apparently desperately.


I hate to go back to back, but of course after this we'll do Girls again.

Boxscore

Stats: 33min 16pts (7-13, 0-1, 2-3) 2reb 0ast 1stl 2blk 2TO
Johnson ( C+ ) -- one of several considerably deceptive boxscores on the night. Had a strong drive to the hoop that actuallty worked in the early game, and then just before half a curl and big dunk as his drives looked better against a Portland team without shotblocking (been along time since you could say that). But in between those two poles it was much of the same stuff we have seen -- absolutely no confidence in his jumper at all, so teams playing 5 feet off him, and he either pulling it down and dribbling into trafffic, or throwing up something ugly. The lack of shooting helping kill us particularly in the 3rd quarter stretch that finished us this game as he and Thornotn just bricked open shot after open shot. Defensively he had some strong moments in the early game, although he did not do as well against Lillard when caught on him on switches as you might have hoped. Was another night of weak boardwork, and when we smallballed he was particualrly impotent on the glass as a PF. Put up the bulk of his points in the late garbagetime, although that included a couple of jumpers for the first time in what seems like forever, so maybe that can spark him going forward. Best offensive numbers of the season, but grade chased backward by the impression that Smart's green light handiwork here has him thinking shot instead of pass. Admittedly wasn't sure what to do with this one.
1348532402_SHikarnye_devushki_v_seksual_nyh_plat_yah_50_foto_14.jpg

Carla Ossa -- moderately attractive Columbian model

Stats: 31min 6pts (3-7, 0-0, 0-0) 8reb 6ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Hayes ( B- ) -- notbale game in that you noticed him more on offense than defense. Defensively Aldridge certianly did not have one of his best nights, but it was hard to attribute much of that to Chuck, and their were several moments where Chuck's munchkin disease came into play with Aldridge or Hicks either shooting right over him or going over him for boards. And in the first half in particular was having to step over consistently when our PGs got beat, and then was often not fast/big enough to recover and effect the open jumpers the Blazers were getting. On the other end of the court though, while he still had the same limitations as a scorer -- getting exposed on his first attempt early when he tried to go inside through Aldridge and got it smushed in his face, before recovering the ball and finishing with a quick push shot -- his passing really became key for us as for the first time this year we got a decent assist total, almost entirely concetrated in Hayes, Reke and Jimmer. The total would have been even higher if anybody could shoot. But Chuck racked up assist after assist in that high post passing role as about the best thing we could figure out to do was try to run the offense through a short, unatheltic, offensively impotent version of CWebb. Hey, its something. Another tough grade really, because I did not feel Chuck had himself that good a game in the ways you expect him to. But the passing trick gave us something to hold onto and that deserves a grade.
Ashley-Greene.jpg

Ashley Greene -- well...Twlight can't be that bad right? Right??

Stats: 31min 8pts (3-9, 0-0, 2-2) 11reb 0ast 0stl 2blk 2TO
Thompson ( C+ ) -- I am wary about letting too many of these grades climb too far in what was a bad loss at home to a bad team, but JT was decent once again. Our best boarder on a night when we got whipped again (JT and Hayes did their job on the glass, nobody else did theirs), but offensively was a regression. Not able to attack effectively inside, and we were seeing more of JT's old twitchy wildness and inability to finish than we have of late. Strong defensive work as a shotblocker/intimidator in the 3rd, but not a great defensive impact over the whole game, and Aldridge wasn't overly concerned. Should have notched an assist on a great pass to Hayes inside in the early third, but Hayes blew the layup. Too many blown gimmes and struggles against length to go any higher here given the results.
esther30.jpg

Esther Baxter -- for Slim

Stats: 30min 10pts (4-8, 0-2, 2-4) 1reb 4ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Evans ( C ) -- I am currently in the process of shifting my grading scale for Reke. Because you know what? If you changed the name on the back of the jersey to Jarret Jack, or some other low level defensive minded combo guard of that ilk, you would have said, hey, pretty decent game by Jarret. Lot of energy on defense, had a few good takes, even knocked down a few jumpers finally, set some people up, although far too many of them missed (I wouldn't mind seeing the Jimmer experiment just to finally see Reke drive, kick to a guy wide open at the three point line, and actually have that guy hit the shot. Wacky idea I know. Anyway, our version of Jarret started off the game more aggressive than we have seen him, looking a bit like that Tyreke Evans guy we used to have before Smart neutered him. Had a nice hard pass to a cutting JT. Several strong drives banging into people inside. And hallelujah splashing in a jumper -- in fact the jumepr looked pretty good all night. Hit 2, and 2 more were right on line an rimmed off. Only the two threes, which were desperation bailout shots against the clock, looked poor. We even, wonder of wonders, actually called a play for him out of our first timeout and he drew the foul. I'm not sure why that wasn't called for JJ, or Hayes, or maybe one of the security guards, but hey, it worked, so I guess it was ok. In a positive sign mostly maintained the defensive intensity too. But the team fell far behind in that early going before he left, and so Smart compeltely froze him again, not returning him to the game until 2:30 were left in the half. Came back in as the PG, and with obvious orders to try to get in Lillard's grill, which he did, smothering him on the perimeter until he made back to back fouling mistakes in the final seconds of the half, committing an offensive foul, and then a defensive foul on a quick Lillard move. Beat the halftime buzzer with an open court pass to TRob for a dunk. Started the 2nd half at the PG, and for about half a quarter the Reke/MT backcourt worked. We jumped out to a 12-4 lead in the quarter, Reke was really working his butt off up top on Lillard, making it much harder for him than it had been against our little guards, and we surged out and took the lead. And then the wheels fell off. With a loud echoing clank. But again it was not Reke who's play turned. We just simply went cold and could not hit the broad side of a barn. Thornton and Johnson were the two biggest culprits there, as Reke repeatedly kicked the ball to them and they tried to break the backboard. And it was game over. When Lillard returned in the 4the it was notable how we quicly responded by putting Reke back in the game to guard him, but the game was over by then and offensively he was just a spectator as great talents like Salmons and Johnson monopolized the ball. Almost two grades here. The grade for Jarret Jack might be a B-. Solid, but not enough. The grade for Tyreke Evans might be a C-, on the missing persons list. I'll split it.
4527638499.jpg

Adelaide Kane -- picking somebody apparently best known for playing a power ranger feels a bit kiddie here, but this franchise continues to strain worldwide hottie resources.

Stats: 7min 0pts (0-1, 0-1, 0-0) 0reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Brooks ( F ) -- woohoo! Finally a grade to reflect my true feelings about this game. because Brooks was just that bad and it absolutely hurt us. nto on offense where he was just inviisible and got nothing accomplished. But on defense...it was a textbook fail. Time and time again he caught caught on picks, or worse yet went under every single screen he eno****ered, and time and again Damian Lillard said thank you very much and either bombed away or had crystal clear passing lanes to whoever he wanted to hit. From a little defensive mapping exercise I did last night I would say that during his minutes out there, Brooks' defense on Lillard actually resulted in every bad defenive possession we had with him on the floor, except perhaps one. That's impressive. Left the game and word filtered out he had an ankle problem? Not sure if that was preexisting and what limited him here, or if it was just the result of him getting them broken in game. Either way I am not in a merciful mood.
2012_7_12_ERLQCm4QMURvRltnZUkuM3.jpg

Kellan Lutz -- okay, last trip down the kiddie parade, but suggested to me by the Ashley Green/twilight pick above
 
Last edited:
Bench

Stats: 32min 14pts (6-14, 0-3, 2-2) 5reb 0ast 1stl 0blk 1TO
Thornton ( C- ) -- you know, two primary things happened to turn our 2 day Boogie-less sojourn into such a debacle. One, Reke did not step up. He's being rolpelayeed, and stayed stuck in that gear. Two, not only did Marcus not step up, he stepped back. I our muddled mess of a system, whatever that may be, its hard for plaeyrs to carve out and define things that #2 guy or #3 guy or whatever. But certainly Reke and Thornton are the #2 and #3 guys for anybody not ironically named "Smart", and it just didn't happen, and without them we are lost. For Marcus we had a strongly defined game, both good and bad. The good was that he brought big effort on the boards, wading in there again and again ont heoffensive glass and getting finishes. He of course ran the break hard. The bad was the rest of it. He was efforting on the boards and getting little follows because that was all he could do to score. His jumper was as off as it was against the Lakers, and again he repeatedly missed big wide open threes set up for him on a platter. He shot 6-14, and I would nto be surprised if he was 0-8 on jumpers. And on defense he was getting caught on picks and trailing after Portland's shooters, who all thought they were Reggie Miller tonight. End result middling numbers for him, but worse than the numbers. The big o-boards and finishes were inspiring, but he struggled at all the things you can build around on either end this time.
tumblr_lw345ys2Rz1qd4z8yo1_500.jpg

Peyton List

Stats: 25min 13pts (5-12, 0-3, 3-4) 1reb 6ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Fredette ( B- ) -- fate conspired for Jimmer last night, as first IT was out due to a death in the family, and then Brooks a) sucked; and b) went down with an ankle problem in the first quarter. And suddenly the "where will the minutes come from" quandry was answered, and Jimmer had a clear run at real time. The good and the bad of this one for Jimmer were strongly defined. Against Lillard struggled to stay in front of him (some are debating this after more nonsesne from our announcers -- check my first quarter defensive mapping post for why I say this) and was getting his dribble really smothered again. But handled the latter better than he has in the past, and while he couldn't hit long spot shots any better than anybody else on our team tonight, he discovered something he could do, repeatedly using step back jumpers off of drives to create space and splashing in the finsihes. Just as importantly made several good passes to people in what looked like their spots. I continue to wonder if he is the only one getting whatever the offense is supposed to be. On the other end was being beaten, but there was some competitiveness there, and he came up with some loose balls. Nonetheless we began playng games to avoid the problmes by the latter stagesof the 2nd quarter, slipping into a zone, and then repeatedly subbing and swapping to keep Reke matched on lillard whenever possible. Was not nearly as effective in his second stint as his first, and when Lillard returned, so did Reke. Was back in the late garbagetime and took a hard foul at the very end of the 4th trying to get a layup. In some ways a little like Thornton, in that he did some good things, but the things he could not do -- hit his threes or defend -- are the very things we needed in order to run a structured system on either end.
2724333444.gif

Wei Zhao

Stats: 30min 12pts (5-7, 0-0, 2-4) 4reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 1TO
Robinson ( B- ) -- one of the advantages of numerous injuries, suspensions, illnesses, and tragedies, is that Smart was forced to use what for him must have felt like a terribly constricting 8-9 man rotation. End result of which was TRob getting the longest run of his young career. The results were mixed. The good of it absolutely was theemerging roleplayer stuff, getting out in the open court, running, and using his athelticsm for big finishes., inclduing one from Reke to just beat the halftime buzzer. When he deviated from that plan is when the mistakes came in. Quick shootng and bricking a jumper, trying to charge all the way in from the 3pt line and getting the charging foul at the end. Had several strong rebounds, but on the night lost most of those physical battles against the clone he replaced in JJ Hickson. Again showed his limitations as a help defender. Once helping poke a way a ball donw low, but simply not challenging guys around the rim. At least we've found something he can do -- he is right now our high flyer. The rest of his game tonight was mediocre. Not terrible. Just mediocre.
Frankie-Sandford_984267a.jpg

Frankie Sandford

Stats: 22min 7pts (3-6, 1-1, 0-0) 1reb 2ast 2stl 0blk 2TO
Salmons ( C+ ) -- offensively impotent until the garbagetime, when he finally for a baseline jumper to fall, and addedone of his classic selfish 1 on 1 midrange spin moves. Also hit our only thre pointer of the game. But defensively he looked good early, whihc may not quite fit with the scoreboard in this one (one thing he continued to not do was rbeound, where he only got 1 on the night per usual as a SF, and we got killed again). But he used quick hands to slap balls away, and he challenged jumpers well. There was no ig SF to overpower him. Defense in the second stint was not so good. I have no idea how this is going to work going forward, but a platoon with Johnson seems most likely.
 
Last edited:
Fuggly!!!!! Only bright spot is the back to back showing by Jimmer. When I saw we were with out DeMarcus I knew it would be tough, bu with no IT, Garcia and almost no Brooks we were done before we started.
 
Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter... Esther Baxter...
 
1) We absolutely have to figure out the PG situation. This whole Brooks/IT/Jimmer carousel is about to become derailed fast.

2) Smart has no instincts for players who fit with eachother. Its NOT that complicated. Take your best slasher (Tyreke) stick him next to your best shooter (Jimmer). When your other shooter (Thornton) is sucking you replace him with another shooter. Jimmer was playing the Beno role to perfection in the 2nd quarter, why didn't we go back to that? We got way too much experimentation with Salmons and JJ with playmaking duties. Why?!?!

3) Every damn player on this team has the green light to dribble and shoot. Its turning into "your turn, your turn, your turn" on offense. Its embarassing. The only moments we had structure was when we ran the offense through Chuck. Otherwise it was Evans iso, then JJ iso (!!!), then Thornton iso, then Salmons iso, etc. DEFINE SOME ROLES and get the players to STICK to them.

4)
 
The "official" attendance down in the 10k range, and nobody can argue with that. 6-7 straight years of this in the amidst of an arena push? The forces seemed aligned against us to lose the team.

Tyreke - IF you didn't have tape of that 20/5/5 season I wouldn't believe it

Jimmer - One thing you have to give him is that he is putting in the effort

Thankfully no Outlaw

But yeah, we once again, even with Cousins, are going to be watching the ping pong balls
 
Blow the team up!! It's completely pointless. Start with DMC and then Tyreke. We'll never win with those 2 as our cornerstones!

F for all grades tonight!
 
Blow the team up!! It's completely pointless. Start with DMC and then Tyreke. We'll never win with those 2 as our cornerstones!

F for all grades tonight!


+1

I'm not mad at all, and don't like having to insult our players, but there is an over-inflated value of those two here on this board. They might be good players with good careers, particularly Cousins, but if they are your best players you have what we have. We will be in the lottery enough though to pick up some stellar pieces
 
I didn't see the whole game, but my impression from this one is that I really like Thomas Robinson but not for any of the reasons I liked him in college. He's woefully over matched in the paint at this level to the point where it's embarrassing when he tries to score in there. But he sure can fly around the court and get his hands into everything. I have no idea how to use him on the court at this point, but I'm intrigued to see what kind of player he's going to turn into. He reminds me of Tyrus Thomas unfortunately, but that doesn't mean he's doomed to fail. Someone is going to have to be creative about finding a position for him. I almost think he's a better fit at SF than PF, but really it just depends on the system and the individual matchups.
 
I didn't see the whole game, but my impression from this one is that I really like Thomas Robinson but not for any of the reasons I liked him in college. He's woefully over matched in the paint at this level to the point where it's embarrassing when he tries to score in there. But he sure can fly around the court and get his hands into everything. I have no idea how to use him on the court at this point, but I'm intrigued to see what kind of player he's going to turn into. He reminds me of Tyrus Thomas unfortunately, but that doesn't mean he's doomed to fail. Someone is going to have to be creative about finding a position for him. I almost think he's a better fit at SF than PF, but really it just depends on the system and the individual matchups.

I've been hinting at that the last few times we've seen him. When he was still trying to do too much the results were pretty feeble. His post and interior game is just not NBA caliber right now, and the jumper is increidbly erratic. But after the summer league, the preseaon, and the first couple of games this season, either he or the coaches seemed to figure something out and he's stepped back now into more of just a high flying roleplayer type of role on offense, and that DOES translate, and he's making some impact with it. You can only take that so far, and if that's it, being picked #5 is going to hang over his head. But there is a definite niche there where he can be useful if we ever could get organized. Then the question would be when/how could he get minutes with Cousins, JT, and Hayes playing well ahead of him.
 
It's really quite simple, and Smart isn't doing a good job, but Petrie handed him a mess. Just look at any possession and the players on the floor. As soon as any player not names Hayes doesn't have the ball, they are suddenly a lesser player and are close to useless. JT/Cuz/Trob can crash the boards, but are really no different then any other team's big men.

IT/MT/Brooks/Outlaw/Salmons/Evans/Jimmer/JJ, they all have the same talent in creating their own shot. But the goal isn't to get a shot, it should be to get a high percentage shot.
 
Fuggly!!!!! Only bright spot is the back to back showing by Jimmer. When I saw we were with out DeMarcus I knew it would be tough, bu with no IT, Garcia and almost no Brooks we were done before we started.

Ugly!!!!! If the bright spot was Fredette then things never got bright. I voted deep bench even though I know he will continue to get playing time. Didm't look nearly as good as he did last game. I hope we are not depending on Cousins to get us out of this - he is not dependable, plays hardly half a game if he's here.
 
The "official" attendance down in the 10k range, and nobody can argue with that. 6-7 straight years of this in the amidst of an arena push? The forces seemed aligned against us to lose the team.

Tyreke - IF you didn't have tape of that 20/5/5 season I wouldn't believe it

Jimmer - One thing you have to give him is that he is putting in the effort

Thankfully no Outlaw

But yeah, we once again, even with Cousins, are going to be watching the ping pong balls

I was there tonight, and there's no way there was 10k in attendance. No way. If I had to bet, I'd say there was 7-8k tops. That place was EMPTY. Not that anyone missed anything, but man...it wasn't even half full.
 
Ugly!!!!! If the bright spot was Fredette then things never got bright. I voted deep bench even though I know he will continue to get playing time. Didm't look nearly as good as he did last game. I hope we are not depending on Cousins to get us out of this - he is not dependable, plays hardly half a game if he's here.

The two quarters that Jimmer played heavy minutes in were the two quarters that were roughly even in scoring. For all of his deficiencies on defense, Lilliard barely scored on him. In fact, Jimmer had a really good 2nd Quarter on both D and Offense. In the 4th quarter, team D all around was horrible. Morale was deflated. The MT/Tyreke experiment in the 2nd half did not work out well.
 
The two quarters that Jimmer played heavy minutes in were the two quarters that were roughly even in scoring. For all of his deficiencies on defense, Lilliard barely scored on him. In fact, Jimmer had a really good 2nd Quarter on both D and Offense. In the 4th quarter, team D all around was horrible. Morale was deflated. The MT/Tyreke experiment in the 2nd half did not work out well.

That's amazing, but my brother just told me that Grant and Jerry were going on about his defense in the 2nd quarter, and I was all WHAT???

Lillard KILLED him that half. It was embarrassing. Not about scoring, but Lillard wnet about 4 minutes there where every single time down the court, and I do mean every single time, he went right around Jimmer. Every time. He missed a couple of shots, his teammates missed more, but it was absolutely porous defense with penetration or open looks every time. To try to spin it as good defense because a few loose balls flew his way is just amazing. We tried zone. Later we macthed Reke to Lillard to try to slow him down. But..jeesh. Maybe they bwere talkign about his minutes on Ronnie Price? But then again that's Ronnie Price. And BTW I thought Jimmer looked much more settled in that half than he used to, on offense. But defensively...

Meanwhiel MT and Tyreke worked well for about 5 minutes...right up until MT and JJ started having a brickoff on open jumpers. Amazing what blowing half a dozen open looks in a row will do for your momentum. We jumped out 12-4 in that quarter, and then this was the sequence: Johnson got his shot blocked. Thornton missed the jumper. JT got 2 Fts. Johnson missed the jumper. Thornton missed a three (wide open). Johnson missed a three. Reke missed a jumper. Thronton missed a three. JT missed a jumper. Meanwhilke the Blazers score 19 to our 2. Game over. Most of those missed shots were open looks to.
 
Last edited:
Jimmy Spencer is on Twitter talking about how badly Sacramento is misusing Tyreke. and now Tyreke's brother is tweeting about it as well. saying the coach continues to ice him. and even mentioned that Rip Hamilton came up to him in Chicago and said "thats crazy, tyreke was killing us and then the coach iced him"

wow. coach is killing the team fast
 
another quote from Tyreke's brother, and it refers to something a lot of us on here have brought up as a problem

"I know his potential. I'm with him in the gym putting him to work. But he can't get into a rhythm on a team where everyone has the green light"
 
Blow the team up!! It's completely pointless.

Not as pointless as your constant blowhard schtick.

there is an over-inflated value of those two here on this board.

Why? Because you say so? Sorry, but your word doesn't cut it. Instead of just throwing a blanket statement out there, how about providing some supporting evidence why Cousins value is over-inflated on this board? Is there a "Cousins for MVP" thread around here that I missed?
 
^if anything the last 2 games are an indication of why maybe Cousins SHOULD be an MVP candidate lol. the team looks like total dog crap without him
 
That's amazing, but my brother just told me that Grant and Jerry were going on about his defense in the 2nd quarter, and I was all WHAT???

Lillard KILLED him that half. It was embarrassing. Not about scoring, but Lillard wnet about 4 minutes there where every single time down the court, and I do mean every single time, he went right around Jimmer. Every time. He missed a couple of shots, his teammates missed more, but it was absolutely porous defense with penetration or open looks every time. To try to spin it as good defense because a few loose balls flew his way is just amazing. We tried zone. Later we macthed Reke to Lillard to try to slow him down. But..jeesh. Maybe they bwere talkign about his minutes on Ronnie Price? But then again that's Ronnie Price. And BTW I thought Jimmer looked much more settled in that half than he used to, on offense. But defensively...

Meanwhiel MT and Tyreke worked well for about 5 minutes...right up until MT and JJ started having a brickoff on open jumpers. Amazing what blowing half a dozen open looks in a row will do for your momentum. We jumped out 12-4 in that quarter, and then this was the sequence: Johnson got his shot blocked. Thornton missed the jumper. JT got 2 Fts. Johnson missed the jumper. Thornton missed a three (wide open). Johnson missed a three. Reke missed a jumper. Thronton missed a three. JT missed a jumper. Meanwhilke the Blazers score 19 to our 2. Game over. Most of those missed shots were open looks to.

I don't know what you were watching, in the 2nd quarter Jimmer was holding his own against Lillard. Tyreke is the one that fouled him for no reason and continually went under screens to give him open 3's. Most importantly in the 2nd quarter Jimmer went right back at Lillard knocking down a lot of midrange jumpers. Tyreke on the other hand couldn't dream of hitting a pull up jumper and did nothing when he was against Lillard. I don't play favorites, but tonight I saw Jimmer playing hard, putting in effort. Tyreke looked pretty pedestrian once again, on a night when he's asked to the #1 option.
 
Not as pointless as your constant blowhard schtick.



Why? Because you say so? Sorry, but your word doesn't cut it. Instead of just throwing a blanket statement out there, how about providing some supporting evidence why Cousins value is over-inflated on this board? Is there a "Cousins for MVP" thread around here that I missed?


I was talking about what I perceived as the prevailing notion, perceived, that Cousins was standard franchise player calibure. I think I got this notion from some fans and media alike. He's young, and as Kings fans we all hope he achieves this in the future. But as of right now, as I said, if he is one of your franchise players you have what we have now which isn't good.
 
Lillard KILLED him that half. It was embarrassing. Not about scoring, but Lillard wnet about 4 minutes there where every single time down the court, and I do mean every single time, he went right around Jimmer. Every time.

What's with the hyperbole? He did not get around Jimmer every single time. They were in the game together the last 4:54 of the first quarter and for 2 1/2 minutes during the 2nd quarter. During these two stretches, Lilliard was 0 for 2 from the field and 2 for 2 from the FT line with 2 turnovers and an assist. Part of that time, Jimmer found himself guarding Ronnie Price and not Lillard. He even got switched off on Batum on one play, who tried to post him up.

I re-watched that portion of the game to ensure my memory was correct. Lillard went around him ONE time when they were matched up one on one. On 5 other occasions, a pick was set for Lillard to gain an advantage and only on one of those occassions did he get all the way to the rim and Jimmer saved himself by reaching in and knocking the ball off Lillard's knee out of bounds. Several times, Lillard took a few dribbles then harmlessly passed off to a nearby teammate. There were two occasions when Lillard put on some moves only to end up forcing up a jumper that he missed. The remainder of the time, Lillard played off the ball and Price initiated the offense.

I'm not sure what game you were watching, but what you're describing did not take place. Even if there was any validity to what you said, you lose it by the use of hyperbole.

Did Lilliard get the better of Jimmer on that end of the floor? Sure. But he got the better of every defender the Kings used on him. Even Tyreke. The kid was simply on fire from the opening tip. One of the threes he hit from about 26 feet out, Jimmer had a hand right in his face. Nothing you can do about that. But to say that he went around Jimmer every single time during a 4 minute stretch in the first half is not only a gross overstatement, it's completely wrong.

I do agree that it is also a gross overstatement to say that Jimmer played great or even good defense. He was average at best. But he did not get KILLED as you stated. That's just an inaccurate statement. Re-watch it.
 
Last edited:
I was talking about what I perceived as the prevailing notion, perceived, that Cousins was standard franchise player calibure. I think I got this notion from some fans and media alike. He's young, and as Kings fans we all hope he achieves this in the future. But as of right now, as I said, if he is one of your franchise players you have what we have now which isn't good.

The kid averaged 18/11 last season and is one of the best young centers in the league. He's certainly a kid worth trying to build a team around. Just because they don't yet have the right pieces around him and just because he isn't a finished product just yet doesn't mean he's overvalued.

One of the Kings biggest problems right now, aside from chemistry and a poor mix of players, is the inability to hit open shots and space the floor properly. Most of that has little to do with Cousins and more to do with the surrounding cast.
 
Start of game: oh look, Evans is playing well with the ball in his hands. Let's bench him for an entire quarter! (Tyreke goes out around 3 min mark of first, comes back at same time in 2nd). Not too bad here because Jimmer was playing well, but still ...

3rd: Oh look, we're having a little good offensive run with the ball in Evans' and Hayes' hands. Let's give the ball to JJ and sub Tyreke out for Salmons!
4th: Oh we're down 20. Hmm ... to win this or not to win this? Ok Evans go back in at the 5 min mark. No no, don't play guard, go space the floor and let James Johnson go 1 on 1.

Shrugs. Really happy for Jimmer though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top