I agree with Jeff Van Gundy when he says impact on winning > stats, to me the ASG is for the best players that year right? Well to me the best players are the top players playing on the best teams. I think Dallas fans/Spurs fans should be far more upset than us if they don't get a All-Star in the game, I mean Monta Ellis has been a beast leading his team to wins and being clutch and he's virtually no shot of getting in so why should Cousins be a lock?
You don't deserve anything if your a crap team in particular when your the only crap team way below 500. that's not trying to tank.
You don't deserve anything if your a crap team in particular when your the only crap team way below 500. that's not trying to tank.
What I did argue was that if you don't even consider Demarcus an all-star candidate, when he is top 3 in points and rebounds, you've lost objectivity and have an ax to grind. That's what I'm suggesting with Jackson and Van Gundy.
I've seen other media (Marc J. Spears comes to mind) argue Demarcus should be starting, yet the TNT announcing crew of Jackson and Van Gundy don't even have him on the list of potential all-stars? When every TNT studio guy has him on the team?
Sure, they're just objective observers of the NBA. No need to mention the guy who is top 3 in points and rebounds. Obviously, you can dismiss that guy as a candidate pretty easily said no one ever. Heck, don't even mention him. Pretend he doesn't exist.
Kevin Love made it three times, once playing for a 17-65 team. And never as a member of a .500 team. What does Love have Boogie doesn't? What could it be? Playing in that media powerhouse in Minnesota? Hmm...