Georgios Papagiannis

#62
Hey I'm a Kings Fan so I hope Papa works out great. That said I would have picked Wade Baldwin at that spot.
I wanted Baldwin as well and by watching him at Vanderbilt I even thought he was worthy of our 8 pick.
But the way the draft went I wonder whether teams had more information on him whether it was injury or being a bad lockerrom guy (there were some rumors pre draft that this might be the case):
8 Kings - Need a PG and had him in for a workout. Trade down.
10 Bucks - Are not sold on MCW. Need shooting and like length. Pick Maker.
12 Hawks - Just traded away their starting PG. Draft Prince.
13 Kings - Pass again. Draft Papagiannis
14 Bulls - Just traded away their starting PG. Pick Valentin.
15 Celtics - Need shooting. Pick Yabusele.

All those teams could have used his skillset but decided to go in a different direction with guys I wouldn't consider being BPA.
 
#63
Hey I'm a Kings Fan so I hope Papa works out great. That said I would have picked Wade Baldwin at that spot.
fyi Wade Baldwin isn't exactly lighting the Summer league on fire either... and summer league is a GUARD's league.

Games of shooting 1 of 7, 2 of 10, and 4 of 13. Overall shooting 28%, and 0% from 3 pointers , 2.5 assist/game. This is playing 25 minutes a game too.
 
#64
Realistically, if he becomes a solid backup, it's not a bad pick. You always draft and hope for more, but the standard isn't historically that high.
As far as fitting with cuz, that's a problem that we hope will happen, because that means he becomes a player of value.
I don't see wcs type minutes this year, maybe by year 3 he can be in contention for real minutes.
 
#65
Realistically, if he becomes a solid backup, it's not a bad pick. You always draft and hope for more, but the standard isn't historically that high.
As far as fitting with cuz, that's a problem that we hope will happen, because that means he becomes a player of value.
I don't see wcs type minutes this year, maybe by year 3 he can be in contention for real minutes.
I think Vlade may have made a mis-step here, not necessarily in taking him but in building him up to the media and creating unnecessary expectations.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
#66
fyi Wade Baldwin isn't exactly lighting the Summer league on fire either... and summer league is a GUARD's league.

Games of shooting 1 of 7, 2 of 10, and 4 of 13. Overall shooting 28%, and 0% from 3 pointers , 2.5 assist/game. This is playing 25 minutes a game too.
I came to post the same thing. Baldwin was who I wanted but his SL performance was nothing to write home about. 28% shooting when he is jumper was supposed to be a strength. And I believe more TOs than assists too
 
#67
I came to post the same thing. Baldwin was who I wanted but his SL performance was nothing to write home about. 28% shooting when he is jumper was supposed to be a strength. And I believe more TOs than assists too
yeah a point guard who can't shoot and already doesn't have advanced handles/penetration ability is a big red flag. Ray McCallum anyone?
 
#68
yeah a point guard who can't shoot and already doesn't have advanced handles/penetration ability is a big red flag. Ray McCallum anyone?
For you to say he can't shoot, shows your lack of knowledge about him. Laughable. Then to say he can't penetrate? LOL
 
#69
I've been down on this pick, but just heard someone talking about Steven Adams with the Thunder and how he's only 22 and what a great piece he's become for them. Big George is only 18. He's far from a finished product. For someone his size, he's got a ton of potential. I don't think it's a pick for now... but there are 4 years before he's 22. What can the organization do with that potential in 4 years is the key. In the past we've wasted that potential, so a lot rides on this staff and this GM to follow through, but Skal and Malachi looking like they can contribute earlier than expected sure relieves some of the pressure there.

He's clearly not ready now, but we won't know about this pick for 2-3 years. I see the potential.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
#70
For you to say he can't shoot, shows your lack of knowledge about him. Laughable. Then to say he can't penetrate? LOL
I like Baldwin and he does have a compact, consistent shot so I think in time he'll adjust and be back to being a good shooter.

But he's not a great penetrating guard. Great in transition but in the half court he's very upright with his dribble and doesn't have much in the way of advanced dribbling beyond a basic crossover. That's compounded by his difficulty finishing when he does attack the basket. That lack of shiftiness with the ball is the primary difference between he and Dunn. Well that and Baldwin's tendency to drift for stretches.

I was (and still am) high on Baldwin as a 3&D PG but I think he'll be best playing off another major offensive threat. A playmaking SG like Harden or a dominant big like Boogie. Where he's not asked to be a real creator.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
#71
I've been down on this pick, but just heard someone talking about Steven Adams with the Thunder and how he's only 22 and what a great piece he's become for them. Big George is only 18. He's far from a finished product. For someone his size, he's got a ton of potential. I don't think it's a pick for now... but there are 4 years before he's 22. What can the organization do with that potential in 4 years is the key. In the past we've wasted that potential, so a lot rides on this staff and this GM to follow through, but Skal and Malachi looking like they can contribute earlier than expected sure relieves some of the pressure there.

He's clearly not ready now, but we won't know about this pick for 2-3 years. I see the potential.
It remains to be seen if anyone picked after 13 becomes a star but right now I'm okay with the gamble on Georgios, especially with Skal looking so good.

But the difference between Papagiannis and Adams is that Adams always had that rugby mentality. He's a very physical presence. I'm not seeing any of that from Papagiannis so far.

I don't know that he'll be the kind of interior defender or rebounder (not to mention enforcer) that Adams has become for OKC. The ceiling for GP looks to be more on the Rik Smits, Brook Lopez side of things. Maybe I can squint and see Marc Gasol but he needs to embrace a more physical game to ever evolve in that direction
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#72
It remains to be seen if anyone picked after 13 becomes a star but right now I'm okay with the gamble on Georgios, especially with Skal looking so good.

But the difference between Papagiannis and Adams is that Adams always had that rugby mentality. He's a very physical presence. I'm not seeing any of that from Papagiannis so far.

I don't know that he'll be the kind of interior defender or rebounder (not to mention enforcer) that Adams has become for OKC. The ceiling for GP looks to be more on the Rik Smits, Brook Lopez side of things. Maybe I can squint and see Marc Gasol but he needs to embrace a more physical game to ever evolve in that direction
Adams switched from wanting to be an All Black to being a Tall Black. I thought he would be a good rough and tumble typw if player but he may very well be more than that.

GP is not like that. He may have been served well by playing a little rugby as a youngster. :)
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#73
It remains to be seen if anyone picked after 13 becomes a star but right now I'm okay with the gamble on Georgios, especially with Skal looking so good.

But the difference between Papagiannis and Adams is that Adams always had that rugby mentality. He's a very physical presence. I'm not seeing any of that from Papagiannis so far.

I don't know that he'll be the kind of interior defender or rebounder (not to mention enforcer) that Adams has become for OKC. The ceiling for GP looks to be more on the Rik Smits, Brook Lopez side of things. Maybe I can squint and see Marc Gasol but he needs to embrace a more physical game to ever evolve in that direction
We just have absolutely no evidence of the sort of skills that a Smitts, Lopez or Gaosl had. I mean basically none.

And the lack of physicality is, as I have noted, my real concern. You don't learn that. Not even at 18. That's something you just are. You either like to bang or you don't. You either are aggressive or you aren't. Now just because of size/relative coordination it doesn't mean Papa can't eventually become an ok rebounder or defender. But its not in the blood, and even at 19 it should be. You know who those guys are from an early age. People don't learn that. They learn how to shoot or not. Not how to bang or not. Papa's physicality is "vague" at best. He looks like he's generally trying to avoid contact. And sometimes that makes all the difference. Now IF he had an advanced skillset, you tolerate that. If he had post moves, if he had a jumper, then that's his focus and he is just a make do player on the other end. But without those apparent skills, being a physical factor is almost a must, and he's not. Leaving him basically as just a tall guy who does exactly what the tapes showed him doing -- set a big pick and roll to the hoop for soft catches and finishes. Even if we'd seen that in Vegas that's not enough to actually matter.
 
Last edited:

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
#74
We just have absolutely no evidence of the sort of skills that a Smitts, Lopez or Gaosl had. I mean basically none.

And the lack of physicality is, as I have noted, my real concern. You don't learn that. Not even at 18. That's something you just are. You either like to bang or you don't. You either are aggressive or you aren't. Now just because of size/relative coordination it doesn't mean Papa can't eventually become an ok rebounder or defender. But its not in the blood, and even at 19 it should be. You know who those guys are from an early age. People don't learn that. They learn how to shoot or not. Not how to bang or not. Papa's physicality is "vague" at best. He looks like he's generally trying to avoid contact. And sometimes that makes all the difference. Now IF he had an advanced skillset, you tolerate that. If he had post moves, if he had a jumper, then that's his focus and he is just a make do player on the other end. But without those apparent skills, being a physical factor is almost a must, and he's not. Leaving him basically as just a tall guy who does exactly what the tapes showed him doing -- set a big pick and roll to the hoop for soft catches and finishes. Even if we'd seen that in Vegas that's not enough to actually matter.
He reminds of Smits in the sense of his height and more importantly length, his soft hands, ability to change ends well for his size, the flashes of a jump shot we've seen and of course in the lackluster rebounding, not being quick laterally and the overall finesse game.

He has a long way to go but Smits was also a freshman at Marist at the same age.

Papagiannis scares me as I never like prospects that enter the league without a translatable skill that they can fall back on. But if he can even get to the level of being a serviceable backup center he's a decent pick and a bargain under the new CBA.

I'm willing to cut him a fair amount of slack for his terrible summer league showing - speed of the game, adjusting to rules changes, always very guard oriented in SL etc but I honestly still don't know what the Kings have in GP.

We'll learn a fair amount about him when camp opens though. If he has a passion for the game and some real drive he'll be able to learn from his failings and make some real gains over the rest of the summer.
 
#75
We just have absolutely no evidence of the sort of skills that a Smitts, Lopez or Gaosl had. I mean basically none.

And the lack of physicality is, as I have noted, my real concern. You don't learn that. Not even at 18. That's something you just are. You either like to bang or you don't. You either are aggressive or you aren't. Now just because of size/relative coordination it doesn't mean Papa can't eventually become an ok rebounder or defender. But its not in the blood, and even at 19 it should be. You know who those guys are from an early age. People don't learn that. They learn how to shoot or not. Not how to bang or not. Papa's physicality is "vague" at best. He looks like he's generally trying to avoid contact. And sometimes that makes all the difference. Now IF he had an advanced skillset, you tolerate that. If he had post moves, if he had a jumper, then that's his focus and he is just a make do player on the other end. But without those apparent skills, being a physical factor is almost a must, and he's not. Leaving him basically as just a tall guy who does exactly what the tapes showed him doing -- set a big pick and roll to the hoop for soft catches and finishes. Even if we'd seen that in Vegas that's not enough to actually matter.
His knee had an MRI before he started playing. Do you think it's possible that this made him exceedingly tentative, given that this is practice, and I'm not sure he had even quite signed his rookie contract yet?

Maybe he just wanted to make sure, make double-triple-quadruple sure... that he didn't get hurt badly before he even got introduced into an NBA game?
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#76
He reminds of Smits in the sense of his height and more importantly length, his soft hands, ability to change ends well for his size, the flashes of a jump shot we've seen and of course in the lackluster rebounding, not being quick laterally and the overall finesse game.

He has a long way to go but Smits was also a freshman at Marist at the same age.

Papagiannis scares me as I never like prospects that enter the league without a translatable skill that they can fall back on. But if he can even get to the level of being a serviceable backup center he's a decent pick and a bargain under the new CBA.

I'm willing to cut him a fair amount of slack for his terrible summer league showing - speed of the game, adjusting to rules changes, always very guard oriented in SL etc but I honestly still don't know what the Kings have in GP.

We'll learn a fair amount about him when camp opens though. If he has a passion for the game and some real drive he'll be able to learn from his failings and make some real gains over the rest of the summer.
Hence, project center. And of the various ways forward for a project: learn a jumper, learn some post moves, learn to be a physically dominant rebounder or nasty defender, the offensive oriented ones are the more likely simply because he has good coordination for somebody his size to maybe execute them.

But in general being a 7' tall nice guy eliminates much of the advantage of being 7' tall in the first place. I know how that stuff starts, you are the big kid, always afraid of hurting somebody etc. and being labeled a bully, but its a bad athletic trait. As a big athlete you WANT to be a bully and establish physical dominance.

I am thinking of opening my own big man school to counter Pete Newel's waste of time learning post moves and whatnot. At my school we're going to learn more practical lessons. Day 1 will be Elbow to the Head day. Although it will cost me a pretty penny to pay short guys to stand in there as the punching bags. Day 2 will be Hip Checks. Day 3 Throw Your Big Ole Butt Into Somebody On the Glass Day, Day 4 How to Turn Into a Screen to Catch the Little Guy's Jaw With Your Shoulder, Day 5 "Accidental" Follow Through on Blocked Shot Attempts Day Day 6 Will Be Finger Wagging/Taunting Day and Day 7 will be MMA Training Day in case any of the midgets attempts to fight back.
 
Last edited:

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#77
His knee had an MRI before he started playing. Do you think it's possible that this made him exceedingly tentative, given that this is practice, and I'm not sure he had even quite signed his rookie contract yet?

Maybe he just wanted to make sure, make double-triple-quadruple sure... that he didn't get hurt badly before he even got introduced into an NBA game?
That would be a better idea if the tapes we had of him in Europe did not show the same guy. Over there though we saw more of the effective rolls to the hoops, soft hands, and finishes,. so I consider it possible his complete inefficiency on offense in Vegas had something to do with his knee and/or more likely the system and guards he had to play with. But nothing that we've seen anywhere shows a fierce competitor on the boards and glass. Just a kid who grew up to be very tall with some coordination and learned how to play the roll man in the pick and roll. That I'll buy.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#79
Wow....way premature to call out the kid with some of these labels. What we do know is he's very young, he's not NBA ready, he has to work on his body and he's inexperienced in the NBA game. 90-95% of the draft picks are not ready for the NBA. Most of those picks shot under 40%. Patience man patience.
 
#80
Wow....way premature to call out the kid with some of these labels. What we do know is he's very young, he's not NBA ready, he has to work on his body and he's inexperienced in the NBA game. 90-95% of the draft picks are not ready for the NBA. Most of those picks shot under 40%. Patience man patience.
What we also know is that what a lot of the scouting reports on him mentioned (being soft, limited away from the basket, passive) is what we saw in summer league vs what a lot of people on here wanted to believe (Marc Gasol lite with the d and passing skills). It is super early but he gave little indication that he's that type of player.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#81
Wow....way premature to call out the kid with some of these labels. What we do know is he's very young, he's not NBA ready, he has to work on his body and he's inexperienced in the NBA game. 90-95% of the draft picks are not ready for the NBA. Most of those picks shot under 40%. Patience man patience.
That's not true. People are about equally split on jumping the gun or just using the blanket "he's young" excuse with prospects, but that's nto teh way it works.

From a young age certain traits are near immutable, those you can know because they are just inherently part of a guy. Then other traits (actually closer to skills) are much more mutable and can change.

Immutable traits:
height/length
athleticism (except as impacted by weight)
hand-eye coordination
toughness/aggression/physicality

Traits that are established very early, typically before we ever get to see guys:
rebounding prowess
ballhandling ability
shotblocking instincts and timing
basketball I.Q./innate understanding

Traits that can sometimes be learned/changed:
shooting skills
post moves
how to set a pick, or use one
how to run the pick and roll etc.
weight gain or loss


Papa can lose weight and learn the bottom skills. There are very few (as in almost no) examples of learning the upper traits (and they are closer to traits than skills, that is the separation).
 
#82
Papagianni's biggest obstacle will be his conditioning. He may be 7'2, but there is no damn way he's 240lbs.

Compare him to 7'1 265lb Ivcia Zubac
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#83
His knee had an MRI before he started playing. Do you think it's possible that this made him exceedingly tentative, given that this is practice, and I'm not sure he had even quite signed his rookie contract yet?

Maybe he just wanted to make sure, make double-triple-quadruple sure... that he didn't get hurt badly before he even got introduced into an NBA game?
His knee was stiff and because NBA teams have a huge investment in these young guys, they did an MRI with symptoms that normally would not call for one. The MRI predictably showed nothing. Now, perhaps all this medical attention for a symptom that he never fussed about in the past may have rattled him. I hope he is not so tentative.

As to the willingness to bang, I see him frequently try to set picks but will look more closely to see if he makes contact. I wonder if a little banging with Cuz will bring out some latent hostility. If it doesn't, it just is not there. The latter sems likely.
 
#84
Based on faith in vlades judgment and GP's highlight reel, i think this kid will be fine by the time the season rolls around. Terrible first impression in summer league, sets the stage for him to rise like a glorious phoenix....how magical it will be to behold!
 
#85
His knee was stiff and because NBA teams have a huge investment in these young guys, they did an MRI with symptoms that normally would not call for one. The MRI predictably showed nothing. Now, perhaps all this medical attention for a symptom that he never fussed about in the past may have rattled him. I hope he is not so tentative.

As to the willingness to bang, I see him frequently try to set picks but will look more closely to see if he makes contact. I wonder if a little banging with Cuz will bring out some latent hostility. If it doesn't, it just is not there. The latter sems likely.
In terms of being tentative, Vlade specifically mentioned him holding the ball too long and needing to make decisions quicker. NBA basketball rather than the European basketball style. I'm not sure it is so black and white with him as Brickie would make it.
 
#87
In terms of being tentative, Vlade specifically mentioned him holding the ball too long and needing to make decisions quicker. NBA basketball rather than the European basketball style. I'm not sure it is so black and white with him as Brickie would make it.

is there a 5 second rule in European basketball? Mind explain why he holds the ball for so long in the post
 
#88
Hopefully Vlade will get into practice and work with GP And show him what it takes to be a big man in the NBA. :cool:
In the interview I copied (someone had posted it earlier in a different thread) on post #60, Vlade indicated that HE WOULD work with him. Hopefully not teaching him how to smoke. But that was just my interpretation of what he said.
 
#89
is there a 5 second rule in European basketball? Mind explain why he holds the ball for so long in the post
I am NO expert but I did find this illustrating the differences.

http://www.fiba.com/asp_includes/download.asp?file_id=518

CLOSELYGUARDED PLAYER / 5-SECOND VIOLATION FIBA: Player holding the ball for 5 seconds; actively guarded within 1 m (3'); anywhere on the court. NBA: No closely guarded rule, but illegal to dribble with dribbler’s back to the basket for 5 consecutive seconds while between the endline and the free throw line extended.
It looks like in FIBA, you can dribble the shot clock away as long as your dribbling back to the basket or not. If I'm reading that wrong, we have plenty of experts (meant as compliment) that will correct me.
 
#90
I would have gone Valentine, especially looking at our PG situation, we need all the playmaking we can get. Not going to rail on Papa but he is clearly a project. Want to at least see him in shape by training camp, that would be a good start.