sactowndog
All-Star
Well. I know a guy who does play by play for the US National Water Polo team (Greg Mescall) which is surprisingly quite similar to basketball. He would be a great replacement hire as he does fit the community.
KHTK=KINGS HOLD THE KEYSSo who made the call at KHTK? IMO it would be ethical if that person would step up and say "I fired Grant."
IMO the Kings should do the same even though Grant stepped down. Someone in the Kings organization should take ownership of Grant's absence.
So who made the call at KHTK? IMO it would be ethical if that person would step up and say "I fired Grant."
IMO the Kings should do the same even though Grant stepped down. Someone in the Kings organization should take ownership of Grant's absence.
Not really necessary as we already know who is responsible for it.
That would be Grant.
I suspect you might be misinterpreting Dime’s comment.So you are saying Grant fired himself?
I say a person fired him and should publicly own up to it.
He’s still sticking with the ‘I didn’t know’ bit, huh? Curious use of caps lock then.i guess Barling went through and disputed s lot of this today. Going to listen shortly
https://nypost.com/2020/06/03/nba-voice-grant-napear-opens-up-on-all-lives-matter-firing/
Wow, another foolish Twitter suicide. Who's next? Napear was always arrogant know it all whose rudeness never compatible with more laid back Sac audience. It's strange his air of superiority NYC attitude tolerated over three long, mostly tortuous decades as part of Kings franchise history. But did it too himself in the end. Another part of terrible curse now gone so Kings fans can give sigh of relief, feel better times ahead. I shed no tears, good riddance Peaches.
Grant lost the Twitter game, and it is as simple as that. I'd venture to guess that even his infamous phrase wasn't the sole reason he ended up fired, but rather with that plus his later tweets. The Twitter Court allows screw ups, but you have to act accordingly once you screw up. He sealed his fate with his following tweets. Celebrities/public figures may have more to lose and a higher risk of losing at Twitter, but everyone runs the chance of losing with each tweet they submit. Be careful if you have a job/career that you value, this doesn't just happen to celebrities. Even though it's five years old now, Jon Ronson's So You've Been Publicly Shamed is a very relevant read.
He replied unnecessarily to BLM with ALM with the current events that are taking place > strike 1. He double downed on his stance > Strike 2. No real apology, instead posting people supporting him while claiming innocence> Strike 3. Boogie backed up by other blue checks > Strike 3 swinging.Well I just read through Grant Napier's Twitter posts and I do not get it. Could someone please explain to me how this results in his firing?
Link to his Twitter account--> https://twitter.com/GrantNapearshow?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
As I said before, this shouldn't have but he should have been gone long ago or at least made to make the choice between radio show or announcing.Well I just read through Grant Napier's Twitter posts and I do not get it. Could someone please explain to me how this results in his firing?
Link to his Twitter account--> https://twitter.com/GrantNapearshow?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
I honestly believe the current climate was a boiling point of frustration and resentment, not just for race relations but also a number of issues from a rapidly failing status quo.
I have no patience for milquetoast status quo enforcers like Grant and I could care less that he was forced out over this.
Nobody would have guessed that by drafting DMC Grant's fate was sealed. It is written.
Wow, another foolish Twitter suicide. Who's next? Napear was always arrogant know it all whose rudeness never compatible with more laid back Sac audience. It's strange his air of superiority NYC attitude tolerated over three long, mostly tortuous decades as part of Kings franchise history. But did it too himself in the end. Another part of terrible curse now gone so Kings fans can give sigh of relief, feel better times ahead. I shed no tears, good riddance Peaches.
Grant was always extremely out of place in Sacramento, and it boggled my mind how he ended up staying for so long. I hope you all remember that this carpet bagger actually advocated for the Maloofs to move to Seattle.
Grant will not be remembered fondly in Sacramento.
Not sure I’d be too worried about becoming very intolerant of intolerance. Negation of the negation is an affirmation of the positive.As I said before, this shouldn't have but he should have been gone long ago or at least made to make the choice between radio show or announcing.
What I am afraid of is in the name of tolerance we are becoming very intolerant.
[Modding]
And, regardless, the "no politics" rule still applies.
That's pure propaganda. Grant was a company man through and through.Your way wrong on Seattle, the Maloofs were real close to firing him.
Grant was always extremely out of place in Sacramento, and it boggled my mind how he ended up staying for so long. I hope you all remember that this carpet bagger actually advocated for the Maloofs to move to Seattle.
Grant will not be remembered fondly in Sacramento.
This isn't a simple math problem. Another way to phrase it is, "When one becomes bigoted towards A bigot they become THE bigot." Not a easy balancing act between advocating against what you detest and not becoming that very same thing. And no, I don't have any answers.Not sure I’d be too worried about becoming very intolerant of intolerance. Negation of the negation is an affirmation of the positive.
Ah, ok, well... one of those moves I think... doesn't matter though because he's a turncoat.Your way wrong on Seattle, the Maloofs were real close to firing him.
The manner that Grant responded was wrong. Caps equal yelling. And downright rude. But he should not have lost his job FOR THAT. He had enough history with his radio show to have been shown the door long before.
But like it or not, the method of presentation comes across just that. Other lives don't matter. And that is not the point that the majority of the protesters are meaning to make but easily could be perceived that way.
I will give an example, Brees made a statement on why he opposed the kneeling during the National Anthem. There was nothing wrong with that. He gave his opinion and why he felt that way. The public backlash he took, was that justified? He cowered and apologized. I can accept people kneeling in protest and can even understand that. But by George, I am not going to approve of that. And for the record, I won't approve of what Kapernich did, but I can respect him for it. He put his money and career on the line and paid one hell of a price after he was blacklisted. Which was not right. The whole handling of that turned me off in terms of the NFL.
The Bee breaks down potential local replacements, no new names from what we've already discussed here: https://www.sacbee.com/sports/nba/sacramento-kings/article243272816.html
No, it doesn't look good. Especially with the caps. Reuters had a interesting article about qualified immunity before any of this happened. They have since followed up following the violence with another on the same subject. I won't go into details but they are interesting reads. Hopefully there will be some bipartisanship solution to address the qualified immunity.I'm not sure if your post will also survive given that the post you're responding to was deleted, but I think there are a couple things that can be stated, sticking to the facts as much as possible.
First, given what Jason Jones and others have said, Grant's departure was about more than just that Tweet. Whether due to racial insensitivity or not, he was an alienating enough figure that current players refused to come on his show. That would appear to be a sufficient business justification for termination in itself, no?
Second, the Tweet itself is problematic. As you suggest, some interpret "Black Lives Matter," to mean "Black Lives matter only," and not "Black Lives Matter, too." But, as you also note, the first interpretation is at odds with what the protestors mean. So, why not listen to them! And, given all that the Kings organization itself has done with BLM the past couple years, not knowing that the second interpretation is what really matters is itself problematic, because it makes it look like he wasn't paying attention to what the team and players were saying. Thus, Grant's claim of ignorance actually hurts his case. Either he knew how his response would come off, or he should have known, and either way it's not a good look.
If this links to a story hidden behind a paywall, you're gonna need to do a bit of a summary. I don't know about anyone else, but the Bee doesn't get a dime from me to read the stuff they promote and then try and get you to pay for.