This site is full of crystal balls. That's the point of it, right? We all have our opinions. I wish my opinion of this Kings team was different. I wish we could be talking about how to win the championship and not how to be a .500 team.
i just find your displeasure completely misplaced. the underachievement of these kings is
rather obviously due to an utter lack of synergy between ownership, management, and coaching. they're all ill-equipped to rebuild this franchise, and for different reasons: ownership's priorities are not basketball-related, as they operate on the cheap while trying to relocate the team, management is comfortably numb to their own stasis, and the coaching staff is woefully inexperienced. its hard to win when nobody's on the same page. look at the structure of the kings teams from the early 00's, and you will see synergy from the top down: ownership believed in its management, and shelled out the bucks to retain its players. management believed in its coaching staff, and provided the talent needed to augment the team further. and that talent likewise believed in its coaching staff, in its management, and in its ownership. there was a governing philosophy of sacramento kings basketball once upon a time, and the entire franchise rode it in the direction of greatness. they came up short, but it was the noblest of efforts for a small market franchise to endeavor in...
unfortunately, each link in that chain has since been severed, and the result is what you see. the maloofs are not the kind of owners they used to be. geoff petrie is not the kind of gm he used to be. and no kings coach since rick adelman has had even the smallest fraction of his basketball acumen. it is a mistake, then, to assume that the current kings centerpieces are the problem, or are at a lack for talent. chris webber came to sacramento as a volatile all-star level big man. however, with the grace and support of his coaches, his gm, and his ownership group, he became one of the league's good guys, as well as one of the greatest PF's of his generation. do you honestly believe demarcus cousins, a volatile big man with all-star potential, is getting that same fair shake from the kings organization as it stands today?
not one individual from anywhere within the organization has offered
unsolicited support for demarcus yet this season, troubled as it has been for him.
not one...
so here's the rundown: if you have a center capable of averaging 20, 12, and 3
in the near future, and a guard capable of averaging 20, 5, and 5
in the near future (having done it once already), as well as a sixth man who can light up the box score on any given night, you quite simply do not quit on them before you've witnessed how far they might take you, ownership, management, and coaching deficiencies aside. if you roll the dice and fail, at least you had a shot at greatness. that said, shipping them all off ASAP would be as shortsighted a move as the nba has recently seen. not to mention these kings are too young and too unproven to demand the kind of return that would help this franchise restart
yet another rebuild, and again, with owners unwilling to fully commit to their franchise. what would be the point? i mean, we've already seen what happens when you trade big talent for "flexible pieces." personally, i would much rather sit at the basement of the league with a couple of players that might catapult me into a championship race someday than spin my wheels at the 7th or 8th seed with a bunch of mediocre talent and "flexible pieces"...