TheRoyalist
G-League
I think Ken Catanella had a hand in that. Still here, thankfully.
Not based on that Fox contract, ha.
I think Ken Catanella had a hand in that. Still here, thankfully.
None of those other deals were max contracts however. If it was less than max, why should Fox sign?Not based on that Fox contract, ha.
If folks want to prop up leftover front office folks for their great financial and negotiating acumen, when the Fox max is on the books, that's their choice.None of those other deals were max contracts however. If it was less than max, why should Fox sign?
If folks want to prop up leftover front office folks for their great financial and negotiating acumen, when the Fox max is on the books, that's their choice.
I don't understand this angle. I'm not going to mute you or call you names. I just don't get it. He's the best player we've had in forever. He gets a max. That's how the NBA works.Not based on that Fox contract, ha.
If he doesn't live up to the contract, gloat then. Until then, I am glad we have a player that is continuing to improve and has the makings of living up to it. And wants to be here. The contract given was expected and didn't raise eyebrows, so I am not sure your point. Maybe you know something the rest of the league doesn't or you don’t. Time will tell.If folks want to prop up leftover front office folks for their great financial and negotiating acumen, when the Fox max is on the books, that's their choice.
There are more than 36 better than him this year, and then some of the injured guys and current younger players will surpass him, too. Again, like him and he's a super fun player. But his game is severely limited and looks much less impressive outside the heavy usage stat pad garbage run games he's had such a steady diet of as a King so far. Paying for that work like this, earlier than necessary, says it all. Incidentally, Fox's ascension would be a potential reason to keep Walton- wouldn't it? Ha.Fox will be the 37th highest payed player in the league next year. Who are the 36 players in the Nba that you project to be better than him in 21/22?
Who says no? But I ain't holding breath on happeningFire Walton.
I would say Fox's ascension would be despite of Walton not because of him.There are more than 36 better than him this year, and then some of the injured guys and current younger players will surpass him, too. Again, like him and he's a super fun player. But his game is severely limited and looks much less impressive outside the heavy usage stat pad garbage run games he's had such a steady diet of as a King so far. Paying for that work like this, earlier than necessary, says it all. Incidentally, Fox's ascension would be a potential reason to keep Walton- wouldn't it? Ha.
Yeah, and therein lies all the reason not to wait and see on anyone connected to Vivek, new or old (folks bragging about those who managed to stay on right alongside the much-vaunted PR "win" of an outside firm hiring a numbers nerd who was jumping the Feritta ship in this very thread... questionable objectivity there).Who says no? But I ain't holding breath on happening
I would say Fox's ascension would be despite of Walton not because of him.
You seemed determined to put down whatever the team does. Would you have been happier with him doing what he had done in the past? Pulling a name from his Rolodex? That is what you accused him of earlier. You can't have it both waysYeah, and therein lies all the reason not to wait and see on anyone connected to Vivek, new or old (folks bragging about those who managed to stay on right alongside the much-vaunted PR "win" of an outside firm hiring a numbers nerd who was jumping the Feritta ship in this very thread... questionable objectivity there).
You seemed determined to put down whatever the team does. Would you have been happier with him doing what he had done in the past? Pulling a name from his Rolodex? That is what you accused him of earlier. You can't have it both ways
Catanella was "the numbers guy". Never talent side. He has negotiated a ton of declining deals that become team friendly on the backend and are easier to move plus should help us avoid any kind of tax unless we finally realize that super team where we are trying to max 3 players. I don't really see any issue at all here except you don't like Fox's deal which seems completely blind to the salary structure of the NBA. These contracts are basically pre-determined with the top players. You either decide to keep them at that price or let them go. There is no way at least 5 other teams aren't maxing Fox if we let him go restricted and then we'd lose the ability to keep him for an extra year and create bad blood in the process.Yeah, and therein lies all the reason not to wait and see on anyone connected to Vivek, new or old (folks bragging about those who managed to stay on right alongside the much-vaunted PR "win" of an outside firm hiring a numbers nerd who was jumping the Feritta ship in this very thread... questionable objectivity there).
Catanella was "the numbers guy". Never talent side. He has negotiated a ton of declining deals that become team friendly on the backend and are easier to move plus should help us avoid any kind of tax unless we finally realize that super team where we are trying to max 3 players. I don't really see any issue at all here except you don't like Fox's deal which seems completely blind to the salary structure of the NBA. These contracts are basically pre-determined with the top players. You either decide to keep them at that price or let them go. There is no way at least 5 other teams aren't maxing Fox if we let him go restricted and then we'd lose the ability to keep him for an extra year and create bad blood in the process.
Catanella was "the numbers guy". Never talent side. He has negotiated a ton of declining deals that become team friendly on the backend and are easier to move plus should help us avoid any kind of tax unless we finally realize that super team where we are trying to max 3 players. I don't really see any issue at all here except you don't like Fox's deal which seems completely blind to the salary structure of the NBA. These contracts are basically pre-determined with the top players. You either decide to keep them at that price or let them go. There is no way at least 5 other teams aren't maxing Fox if we let him go restricted and then we'd lose the ability to keep him for an extra year and create bad blood in the process.
I think the term "max" throws people off too. I think some believe that is reserved for the 10 best players in the game when it's basically the going rate for a top 30-40 player.
Yes - players are eligible for a maximum raise in their second contract. The best player on any team is going to get that. The second and third best players on good teams also get it.I think the term "max" throws people off too. I think some believe that is reserved for the 10 best players in the game when it's basically the going rate for a top 30-40 player.
Now I can get on board with the concerns about Vivek. But again, you can't fire the controlling interest. But despite these concerns, everything he does doesn't automatically deserve negativity. If he stays in his lane and let those hired to manage the team do so, that would be a plus.Not at all the case, as I've stated clearly regarding Haliburton elsewhere in the forum. And you've agreed that the top is the problem- all things Vivek deserve criticism until the wins come and the clear personnel improvement actually takes shape.
But seeing so much hype about that particular approach when the hire was an unproven numbers nerd guy off of the fashionable Sloan Conference/Morey tree on the other end of the spectrum from the "basketball guys" approach smells even fishier than just throwing money at the most famous former player interested in running a basketball team these days. Dumars is still here though, so who knows. If anything, the McNair move is easily folded in with Vivek's general trend of keeping lots of ambiguity about who makes decisions floating around, lots of folks to be fired or hung out to dry when things go South as they always do. "Give him some time" is a nice idea for a recovery project internally, with Vivek and who knows who else believing they are doing meaningful work to change. But it's the same folks still.
So: show me those wins! They are technically improved at the moment (.444 to last year's .431). But under .500 is just under .500 for this team, where it counts.
Players far worse than Hield were getting equal or more this last offseason. Were you alive when Rickey Henderson got 3 million per to play baseball and we all collectively lost our minds? Because today 18-20 million for a shooting specialist is the going rate.Hield is immovable now and Fox soon will be, as well, at any sort of return this dweeb Vivek will accept.
So I get this, truly I do, but also it's a practice in the league that indicates how braindead management is and how silly the financial approaches are.
Meanwhile, the Spurs targeted Dejounte Murray, developed him, and locked him in at a far better deal.
It's not entirely fair to hold the Kangz up to the Spurs on management work and talent scouting and development, but that's the sort of smart I'm comparing it to. Hield is immovable now and Fox soon will be, as well, at any sort of return this dweeb Vivek will accept.
Players far worse than Hield were getting equal or more this last offseason. Were you alive when Rickey Henderson got 3 million per to play baseball and we all collectively lost our minds? Because today 18-20 million for a shooting specialist is the going rate.
We just disagree on Fox's value. IMO if Fox can hit 37 percent from 3 and 77 percent from the line in his prime he is a 25 and 7 player. Only time will tell.
None of those numbers are wins.
sand flinging? I was giving you benefit of the doubt that you are older like me and may not understand why today's salaries are as high as they are. But they just are that high. I don't get it either. Buddy's deal is absolutely normal. Some might even say slightly below market. It's not my fault the NBA is silly money.Oh my.
Saw Ricky play in person many many times.
I think I'll leave you to the sand flinging.
I said my piece. After tonight's loss, if Walton isn't out, that's enough of a sign that all the New Management hyping and trading card polishing is part of the same old Vivek, for good. Whoever talked him into/set up the optics of "not taking revenue sharing" or whatever that story is, is obviously from the BOG control center. This team is a shadow regime lol.
Talk about moving goal posts. Those numbers are in relation to Fox and his max contract.None of those numbers are wins.