To be honest, it's hard to see how his record is even .400 without those because the Laker team he inherited was awful. But he went 39-4 while there which is over .900oh my mistake

To be honest, it's hard to see how his record is even .400 without those because the Laker team he inherited was awful. But he went 39-4 while there which is over .900oh my mistake
Why would McNair sign Whiteside then tell his coach not to play him?
To be honest, it's hard to see how his record is even .400 without those because the Laker team he inherited was awful. But he went 39-4 while there which is over .900![]()
because if the team was playing well Whiteside might help them reach the play-offs and if they were playing poorly keep them from a top pick. It’s called a contingency plan, something he should have had for the Bogi free agency.
Whatever reason he had for wanting to come here I'm sure is gone nowAlso, I'm not convinced there wasn't another team or will not be another team that may want Whiteside on the minimum. It's possible he had his reasons to come here, or wanted to.
Fine what is your reasoning why Walton isn’t playing him? I’m not Monday morning quarterbacking just providing possible context.I'm no fanboy of McNair, but this is basically the 8 AM bacon, sausage, eggs, toast, strawberry jam, waffles, syrup and a brutal pick-6 you never saw coming of Monday Morning Quarterbacking.
have you considered he is being told to limit Whiteside who isn’t tradable and isn’t a piece for the future? Not sure why McNair is getting off scot-free.
No, I haven't considered it.. Logically, why would McNair sign Whiteside to a contract with the idea of not playing him? Is he also telling Walton to play Joseph a lot of minutes? I think McNair can safely leave Walton's self destruction up to Walton!
Fine what is your reasoning why Walton isn’t playing him? I’m not Monday morning quarterbacking just providing possible context.
I don't think it's up to the Capt to make sense of Walton's decisions. That's something you need to ask Walton. Neither the Capt or myself are mind readers. I only care about results. I have no idea why General Custer decided to attack 3000 indians with 400 men, but somehow, he probably convinced himself it was a good idea at the time. Why Walton decides to do what he does is unimportant, however, the results are important. McNair didn't hire him, and it's just a matter of when, not if, he's fired.
In the short term, it makes sense to ride him out for this season until McNair can make some changes. After which he can bring in his own choice for the position. The worry of course is will any long term damage be done in the short term. How long will Vivek be able to hold it together?
I would guess with the Kings looking unlikely to make the play-offs, Kings are playing their young guys who need to grow and those who may be tradeable.
you make it sound like Walton is the general. Last I checked Walton works for McNair not the other way around.
Geez, another fire the coach thread. As if that will make any difference. Reminds me as to when the owner fired Malone and named Tyrone Corbin as the head coach. How did that work out?
Bottom line here-it is the players and lack of talent thereof. It was easy to Coach the Warriors during their championship run. If the Kings do not defend well enough and score more than the opposing team-then we lose.
Let Luke have his second year here and then decide what's next...we're not going to be a playoff team regardless of who else could coach the team this year,.
What really bothers me is the GM of OKC, Houston, and New Orleans have stacked picks up for their re-build already. Rather, our Kings approach, seems to be more of the same...slow trickling death-even though this is the perfect time to hit the complete re-build-as we can have no fans. Wake up GM. As it was said in Shawshank redemption "Get busy living, or get busy dying."- a warning to us all btw.
With the way the Kings have looked defensively, comparing Walton to Custer is apt.I don't think it's up to the Capt to make sense of Walton's decisions. That's something you need to ask Walton. Neither the Capt or myself are mind readers. I only care about results. I have no idea why General Custer decided to attack 3000 indians with 400 men, but somehow, he probably convinced himself it was a good idea at the time. Why Walton decides to do what he does is unimportant, however, the results are important. McNair didn't hire him, and it's just a matter of when, not if, he's fired.
In the short term, it makes sense to ride him out for this season until McNair can make some changes. After which he can bring in his own choice for the position. The worry of course is will any long term damage be done in the short term. How long will Vivek be able to hold it together?
Yeah, Luke sucks.
But our awful defense has to be attributed to the players, at least somewhat. I mean, players gotta take pride in putting in defensive effort. Luke is certainly awful, but the inability to guard a paper bag is on individual players too.
I think that you and I, and I'm fairly sure both McNair and Vivek know this team is very unlikely to make the playoff's. You know your going to be in the lottery. So the question is, how do you approach the season with that knowledge? With a good group of players coming in the next draft, you want to get the best player you can, hopefully a future star. So you need to lose a lot of games. At the same time, you want to see improvement and growth out of your future core players. You want to start building a winning mentality. That's a very fine line to walk.
And, your trying to do all this with a head coach that's desperate to reverse his fortune. Desperate men make bad decisions. I think I can safely say that Walton cares more about his own future than the future of Whiteside, or any other player on the team and I would be shocked if otherwise. Personally, I would have fired Walton along with Vlade, but that was a Vivek decision, and probably a financial one. Needless to say, McNair has his work cut out for him.
We as fans have little to go on when it comes to the inner workings of McNair's mind. So it should be an interesting ride. So far, like Petrie, he appears to keep everything close to the vest.
Geez, another fire the coach thread. As if that will make any difference. Reminds me as to when the owner fired Malone and named Tyrone Corbin as the head coach. How did that work out?
Very bizarre season yet again. It’s not too late to salvage this thing if they’d just fire the guy now instead of waiting.
I’ll never understand why we continue to hire new GMs whilst keeping the previous coach and regime. What the hell is the point? That defeats the purpose for me.
It's always fun to see someone using the "it didn't work before so why try now?" argument when comparing chess and reversi like the pieces are the same.
All three of those teams had a superstar to dangle in order to acquire those future picks. Who exactly on the Kings roster would get that kind of return? How long has McNair been running the team? He's barely had enough time to put together his staff much less make a bunch of great trades to entirely rebuild the team. I've seen impatience before, but your statement is ridiculous. How about we give McNair a little more than five minutes to figure out what he wants to do.
Superstars like Jrue Holiday?
All three of those teams had a superstar to dangle in order to acquire those future picks. Who exactly on the Kings roster would get that kind of return? How long has McNair been running the team? He's barely had enough time to put together his staff much less make a bunch of great trades to entirely rebuild the team. I've seen impatience before, but your statement is ridiculous. How about we give McNair a little more than five minutes to figure out what he wants to do.
so many wasted comments in this conversation, this is really the only point of this thread.Coaches number goal is to win games anyway they can.