Andriod_KiNg
Starter
Fire Westfail.
It almost has to be bumped. Its not even if Westphal deserves it or not. Its not even if the Maloofs would do it financially or not given that they just picked up his optin year over the summer and are going to be wincing at throwing another $2mil out the door. Its just that point where it looks like a team may have quit on the coach. How do you get that back?
I seriously doubt Westphal is fired anytime soon. It's only 14 games in, as bad as it's gotten losing 10 straight or whatever it is. Last season Westphal was judged to have righted the sinking ship with his 25 wins after horrendous disaster of only 17 the previous season. Theus was judged a success after his 38 wins following drunkin' Muss disaster of 33 wins. The Maloof's know they've made a series of questionable (the kindest word) coaching moves dating back to handling of Adelman. I doubt they will just shove someone like Mario Elie into the hot seat knowing that he could be another Kenny Natt clone. Westphal stays for awhile - likely making it through the entire season. The Kings still might scratch out 30 wins and that's probably all one can realistically wish for considering overall mediocre young talent on this team. I do expect a trade or two however, just because some of this junk is just that, junk.
I seriously doubt Westphal is fired anytime soon. It's only 14 games in, as bad as it's gotten losing 10 straight or whatever it is. Last season Westphal was judged to have righted the sinking ship with his 25 wins after horrendous disaster of only 17 the previous season. Theus was judged a success after his 38 wins following drunkin' Muss disaster of 33 wins. The Maloof's know they've made a series of questionable (the kindest word) coaching moves dating back to handling of Adelman. I doubt they will just shove someone like Mario Elie into the hot seat knowing that he could be another Kenny Natt clone. Westphal stays for awhile - likely making it through the entire season. The Kings still might scratch out 30 wins and that's probably all one can realistically wish for considering overall mediocre young talent on this team. I do expect a trade or two however, just because some of this junk is just that, junk.
I seriously doubt Westphal is fired anytime soon. It's only 14 games in, as bad as it's gotten losing 10 straight or whatever it is. Last season Westphal was judged to have righted the sinking ship with his 25 wins after horrendous disaster of only 17 the previous season. Theus was judged a success after his 38 wins following drunkin' Muss disaster of 33 wins. The Maloof's know they've made a series of questionable (the kindest word) coaching moves dating back to handling of Adelman. I doubt they will just shove someone like Mario Elie into the hot seat knowing that he could be another Kenny Natt clone. Westphal stays for awhile - likely making it through the entire season. The Kings still might scratch out 30 wins and that's probably all one can realistically wish for considering overall mediocre young talent on this team. I do expect a trade or two however, just because some of this junk is just that, junk.
The Kings will not scratch out 30 wins this season if PW remains head coach, and this junk is junk because Westphal is turning it into junk. The Kings have a talented roster, and even a reasonably balanced one, worth far more than its current record, but even the most talented players would look like scrubs under Westphal's non-system. Any trade at this point would be useless. The players we ship out will suddenly flourish elsewhere because they will be playing in a defined system with defined roles, and the players we bring in will become scrubs because they will be just as confused as anyone else.
Do they really though? I mean who on this team would you honestly say is elite in any category? The only player who's "elite" in any area I can see is Dalembert in shot blocking. But his offense has sucked so bad that the shot blocking hardly matters.We've gto a lot of skilled players ont his team, and a number of them who are actually elite in one area or another.
Do they really though? I mean who on this team would you honestly say is elite in any category? The only player who's "elite" in any area I can see is Dalembert in shot blocking. But his offense has sucked so bad that the shot blocking hardly matters.
The more I watch this team the more I realize that they are mostly hype. We've been sold this notion (via some pretty clever marketing) that they have this great young core, are on the rise, etc. but when you really look at the roster, they don't and aren’t.
Everyone on the team with the exception of Evans and DMC are either second tier role players or over-hyped young players with "potential". And if you want to get right down to the cold, harsh truth, Evans and Cousins have been hyped up to be more than they probably are too.
Even in a best case scenario, where they develop and grow over the next few seasons, they’re still probably a 45 win team at best. The only way I can see them ever doing more than that is if either A, Evans and Cousins both develop into star caliber players, or B, by some miracle they land Carmelo or some other top player via free agency or trade.
No, it’s really not. They simply don’t have any impressive players on the roster other than Evans and Cousins and even they have a long way to go. Casspi, Greene, Thompson, and Whiteside, who are supposed to be the rest of the young core, are all unproven question marks at this point. If at least two of the aforementioned players don’t developed to a high level along with Evans and Cousins, the team isn’t going anywhere.No, this is the current losses talking.
There are a lot of people, good people, who saw, and with a few wins woudl again see, Reke and Cousins as potential title contending cornerstones, and us folwing an OKC type trajectory.
That may be true but it really doesn’t matter if he’s stuck on a bad team.Cousins, today, might be one of the 5 moxt offensively talented centers in the game.
Reke's to the basket game is just about the best I have seen from a player his size in the last...I don't even know how long. Its magical. And guys who can fill up those stat categories are the 2nd rarest and most elite breed in the game
But we all know he’s most likely a one year rental. Unless he takes a huge pay cut to stay in Sacramento (and why would he?) some other team will sign him.There is an elite shotblocker/defender in Daly
an aggressive post scorer who was going to win 6th man of the year last year until we plucked him and forced him into the starting lineup (Carl)
and at least 5 other guys who could start as roleplayers for various teams around the league (Beno, Cisco, JT, Donte, Casspi, the last two possible more than roleplayers).
We may have more top to bottom talent than the Hornets, who are overacheiving like mad.
That depends on how you define talent. If you define it by raw skills and individual potential, then yes. But raw skills and individual potential unfortunately don’t translate to wins.
Yes they do. In the long run that's precisely what they do.
That is the whole key that you have missed in thread after thread, post after post: you will never win big without big talent.
You could theoretically aim low, as a second class first round speedbump team trying to win 41 games and sneak into the playoffs. That is in fact what we got stcuk doing for 3-4 years after the old teams evaporated. But that's pointless loser talk.
All those great talented players on those current great teams were once upn a time nothing but talented young players. But without the talent, they never would have gottten to where they are.
You’re not reading what I’m saying very carefully. I didn’t say they’d need 4 players that were at Tyreke’s level. I said they’d need at least two other players besides Cousins and Evans to develop to a high level. Developing to a high level doesn’t mean “as good as Tyreke”.Also your standard for what we would need to become a great team is absurdly high. 4 Tyreke level players at their respective positons in the future not only virtually guarantees us a title, it might make us the GOAT team
A team like Orlando is a contender with one great player, tow other faded good players (Vince and Carter) and a bunch of roleplayers and solid starter types.
They’re also one game over 500 and facing the harsh reality that a big 2 ½ backed up by mediocre role players just may not be enough to win an NBA title like they thought it would.Even Miami is tow and half greats 1 solid starter who may now be out for the season (Haslem) and scrubs.
Again, not sure why you’re pointing that out since I didn’t claim you’d need 4, 5, or 6 great players. You do need a few guys playing at a high level to go along with your one, two, or three great players, though. That’s why I choose to use “high level” rather than “great”. I thought by doing so it’d be clear that I wasn’t saying you need 4 Kobe’s to win a title. What you do need though, is a Kobe, plus a Gasol, and an Artest, Odom, Bynum, and Fisher to compliment them. Even assuming all goes as good as can be expected and Evans/Cousins become our Kobe/Gasol, they simply don’t have the Artest, Bynum, Odom, or even Fisher caliber player to go with them. Evens/Cousins won’t do it on their own without some high caliber help no matter how good a duo they may theoretically become.There are very few teams wiht 4,5,6 great players. The aforementioned Hornets half all of 1 great player. Then 2-3 upper echelon starters, a new solid guy in Jack, and those scrubs again.
I am getting a bit bored of hearing "they're a young team"
We're not even the youngest team, 6th youngest apparently.
i'd be interested to know who the other youngest teams are and how they're doing.
Thanks for that; that's interesting. Griz; Knicks and Thunder are all good teams I bet they don't hear the young team crap every night. Even Toronto are on a pretty good run, same age range as our team.
You'd think being young would be an advantage; at the end of the day we all know its not about age its about quality. If you had a team with Griffin, Durant, Evans, Derrick Rose etc etc no one would be talking about age would they; they'd be talking about playoffs.
the best teams seem to be the oldest though we can't deny that.
Yeah no doubt about that, with the exception of The Thunder who are somewhat of an anomaly. You expect the older more experienced teams to be the best, especially when they're loaded when with talent like The Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Heat, etc. are. But that doesn't mean that young teams should be expected to automatically suck just because they're young.the best teams seem to be the oldest though we can't deny that.
Youth is always a huge factor in the NBA. And the average age stats there may if anything be somewhat deceptive. In key personnel ages we might be only rivaled by Minny. The best players on Memphis are Gay and Zach, who are I think 5th and 9th year vets. The best guys on OKC are their Big three who are 4th, 4th and 3rd year vets, Our best guys are a rookie and a 2nd year vet. It makes a major difference. Give me Reke and Cousins in their 4th years and I guarantee things look better. Our top guys, the guys theoretically making decisons and winning games for you, are mere babes.
The thunder have definitely lucked out with some of their talent. We have Greene and Thompson in their 3rd years and they seem to be middling.
The big thing pre season was that Dalambert would bring some vet leadership to the team.... without being inside the camp its hard to define exactly what impact he's having as a veteran voice.
I remember that interview Reke did last year on some show where he said something like "they don't take it seriously" i wonder if thats still the case and most of our players are cruising for that pay check.
So let's say Westphal does get fired. Who would you guys want? Byron Scott? Jeff Van Gundy? Maybe promote Elie? Bring back Musselman![]()