They met. At that meeting do you think they talked about the weather and how the NFL season might go? Just because a formal offer wasn't made there is no way both sides didn't know what each was offering.
I'm selling my house. I get an offer at asking. I haven't taken it yet so we continue showing the house. People like house, tell agent an offer is coming. As a courtesy agent lets the other buyers know we have one offer pending at asking.
Do you think if someone was looking to get in under asking they bother making a formal offer or they just move on with this new knowledge?
oh its just that simple huh? nothing else factors into it. you think NBA players always take the highest $ offer and thats it?
you think staying loyal to a city you like doesnt come into play? what about the decision of living in New Orleans opposed to California? what about the fact that he would be a starter here, or a bench player in New Orleans?
im not saying he would take less money to stay here or not, but you can't rule it out, and now we will never know
They met. At that meeting do you think they talked about the weather and how the NFL season might go? Just because a formal offer wasn't made there is no way both sides didn't know what each was offering.
Did you rack up 4400 posts just since May... all of them cringing at Vivek's decisions?
Or did you change your user name when Vivek took over the team?
Based on your consistently scathing critiques of this front office, maybe you should change it back? It is just so wierd for username HereWeVivek to be a broken record blasting his every move, ya know?
The thing with GW is that it was an easy fix that Petrie and Co. failed to catch and fix early. Sign a guy just to expose next year. BTW, the rule that said you can't protect 8 players if you only have 8 under contract, or whatever it was... absolutely stupid rule. But it was there and we could have rectified it easy.That's my point, but this argument will most likely continue for years, much like the debate about whether or not Gerald Wallace should have been exposed to the draft.
All I can say is I'm not to worried about losing Tyreke. He is not worth 11 mil. No way.
The thing with GW is that it was an easy fix that Petrie and Co. failed to catch and fix early. Sign a guy just to expose next year. BTW, the rule that said you can't protect 8 players if you only have 8 under contract, or whatever it was... absolutely stupid rule. But it was there and we could have rectified it easy.
This was not an easy fix for a team stuck in a salary cap mess thanks to the previous regime and a logjam of mismatched players. I'd like to see what happens before I freak out. And that includes finding out where we draft next season and how Tyreke adapts on his new team.
We're still in the middle of this deal. It isn't complete. The trade was essentially Reke for Vasquez + cap space. Until that cap space is used, this deal is still ongoing.I have said this in many ways already but the bottom line is that Tyreke may be an $11 mil athlete but he is not an $11 mil fit with the Kings. The FO was not willing to conduct a lab experiment costing $11 mil to see if Tyreke could coexist with McLemore in the back court. I don't fault that as it is at least a line of reasoning that makes sense. Perhaps we will spend $11 mil elsewhere for a player where there are no question marks.
We still have an opportunity to get a near all star quality FA with either the money freed up in the S&T or the $20 mil that would exist with amnestying Salmons. The fat lady has not sung on this deal and we are being premature in slinging stones at the FO. To carry this to a ridiculous level, what if we used the $20 mil to sign Howard? I am not advocating that by any means but we have enough money to sign damn near anyone not named Kobe. That "anyone" may be a better fit than Tyreke and gasp! he might even be better as an athlete. Trades can occur and FAs can be signed. We still haven't used what we gained from the S&T and that is roughly $9 mil.
I may have details wrong but I hope the point is understandable.
Bottom line, it's time to move on and look at the future but considering Tyreke unfortunately has been the major topic of conversation of the last two years, I realize we may need a few weeks to decompress. People have reams of stats lined up to argue against or for Tyreke and those stats will need to be used this one last time.
Just a question, bound to pee everyone off, but let's just say Reke really was bluffing and he'd rather play for Sac at 9 million instead of NO for 11. Is he bound to the agreement because of the offer sheet he signed or can he back out of the contract with NO before the 10th?
We're still in the middle of this deal. It isn't complete. The trade was essentially Reke for Vasquez + cap space. Until that cap space is used, this deal is still ongoing.
There is still the "what is the rest of the deal" component to all this. How is it time to move on mid deal? Later, when we either fill that cap space or don't, then we discuss the entire deal.
I find it odd those who are backing this deal are fine stating that opinion over and over and the other side doesn't ask them to curtail posting, yet those who do question this deal and where we are at this point are being asked to curtail posting on the topic. Seems one side can't handle the opinions of the other.
I believe he hasn't even signed the offer sheet yet, just verbally committed that he'd sign it on the 10th. I could be wrong but I think the way sign and trades work is that he actually never signs the offer sheet from NO, we sign him for whatever NO is going to pay and then trade him off.
We're still in the middle of this deal. It isn't complete. The trade was essentially Reke for Vasquez + cap space. Until that cap space is used, this deal is still ongoing.
There is still the "what is the rest of the deal" component to all this. How is it time to move on mid deal? Later, when we either fill that cap space or don't, then we discuss the entire deal.
I find it odd those who are backing this deal are fine stating that opinion over and over and the other side doesn't ask them to curtail posting, yet those who do question this deal and where we are at this point are being asked to curtail posting on the topic. Seems one side can't handle the opinions of the other.
I have said this in many ways already but the bottom line is that Tyreke may be an $11 mil athlete but he is not an $11 mil fit with the Kings. The FO was not willing to conduct a lab experiment costing $11 mil to see if Tyreke could coexist with McLemore in the back court. I don't fault that as it is at least a line of reasoning that makes sense. Perhaps we will spend $11 mil elsewhere for a player where there are no question marks.
We still have an opportunity to get a near all star quality FA with either the money freed up in the S&T or the $20 mil that would exist with amnestying Salmons. The fat lady has not sung on this deal and we are being premature in slinging stones at the FO. To carry this to a ridiculous level, what if we used the $20 mil to sign Howard? I am not advocating that by any means but we have enough money to sign damn near anyone not named Kobe. That "anyone" may be a better fit than Tyreke and gasp! he might even be better as an athlete. Trades can occur and FAs can be signed. We still haven't used what we gained from the S&T and that is roughly $9 mil.
I may have details wrong but I hope the point is understandable.
Bottom line, it's time to move on and look at the future but considering Tyreke unfortunately has been the major topic of conversation of the last two years, I realize we may need a few weeks to decompress. People have reams of stats lined up to argue against or for Tyreke and those stats will need to be used this one last time.
how was my post blasting Vivek at all? i was responding to Jamal who was saying that $ is the only factor in free agents decisions.......
You guys are all (mostly?) assuming it was about money. There could have been other reasons mixed in as well, such as personality conflicts, anticipated roles on the team next year, etc., etc., that we will likely never know about (if they ever existed to begin with), just like we won't know the conversation details at the meeting they had.
Twitter comments be damned, I don't think we know all the details of the Andre thing and I don't think we know all the details here either.
And, yes, that is also speculation, just like the previous 500 posts in this thread.
Point being, can we quit beating a dead horse now and move on with what "is"?
oh its just that simple huh? nothing else factors into it. you think NBA players always take the highest $ offer and thats it?
you think staying loyal to a city you like doesnt come into play? what about the decision of living in New Orleans opposed to California? what about the fact that he would be a starter here, or a bench player in New Orleans?
im not saying he would take less money to stay here or not, but you can't rule it out, and now we will never know
Does anyone know if Cousins had anything to do with this move? Didn't he mention in the past that he didn't like playing with Evans?
Just like to let you guys know the Kings are horrible in NBA 2K13 after the trade (McLemore in too)
Does anyone know if Cousins had anything to do with this move? Didn't he mention in the past that he didn't like playing with Evans?
Just like to let you guys know the Kings are horrible in NBA 2K13 after the trade (McLemore in too)
It was someone on Twitter who said they aren't necessary "peas and carrots".