$8 mil in cap space is more valuable to us than Koufos. Do you disagree?
I'd specifically like to hear your argument against this point.
I don't necessarily agree that he is underpaid. I think his contract is market value. His current contract is equivalent to $5.5-$6 mil under the old CBA. That seems on par. And considering guys like Ezeli, T. Zeller, Marjanovic, A. Jefferson, Aldrich, & M. Leonard, are all between $7-$10 mil a year, I think it helps confirm that belief. People like to look at Mozgov and think "Wow, Koufos is on a great deal! He has so much value!" When in fact, the Lakers made a horrible signing and overpaid drastically.
I'm curious to why you think a C who's only averaged over 20 MPG one time in his 8 year career is underpaid at $8 mil per year?
Thank you for acknowledging that a 2nd round pick has value (although not a lot). I'm glad I'm starting to mold your absolute mindset
![Wink ;) ;)]()
. However, you're forgetting adding more protection to our 1st rounder. This trade could be the 11th/12th pick in the 2017 draft, a 2017 2nd round pick, & $8 mil in cap space for Koufos & McLemore. Keep in mind that I said "could." I think everyone would do that deal in a heartbeat, but the possibility of us conveying the pick anyway or falling in the bottom 10 makes the deal more reasonable.
The risk if we don't do the trade:
- We have $8 mil less to spend next offseason and could miss out on a FA we want
- We risk not getting value back for McLemore
- We risk conveying our 1st round pick
The risk if we do make the trade:
- McLemore breaks out and increases his value
So really, the only risk is a 3 year player overcoming his mentality and becoming a relevant/consistent player, and considering you are higher on him than most (hence the thread) due to his deadlift and a report here and there, I understand where you're coming from. You think there is a really good shot at him becoming a player this season, and for his sake, I hope so! But again, we really don't have much insight into the offseason. We hear and see what they want us to hear and see a lot of the time. If the FO is genuinely excited about him (and not just releasing these reports to try and boost his trade value), then I'm more than happy to give him a shot, but it's hard for anyone to firmly say "We should never do that trade because McLemore is going to breakout" when you're not even going by data or by your eyes. You're going off snippets, 10sec videos, murmurings, etc...