jeffjcalweb
G-League
well said brick. i'd argue mobley is a bit better than just a good scorer. not elite like kobe or mcgrady, but a step above good.
bigbadred00 said:mobley's number look exactly like Manu Ginobilis. mobley plays more minutes though....manu is also an all-star if we neednt forget.
bigbadred00 said:Manu averages 1.7 a game and WEBBER is averaging 1.5 a game in 6 more minutes per game. Manu is a good defender but I wouldnt say a thief. Manu is definitely a good player, a great defender but he's no Larry Hughes when it comes to steals.
jeffjcalweb said:i didn't look at just scoring, that was the list you sent w/just scoring. i don't need to break down the NBA players association for you, i watch enough bball to know what i'm talking about.
and by the way, here's Ginobilli's stats (again, check your facts):
15.9 ppg, 4.0 apg, 3.7 rpg, 1.6 spg 36% 3PT FG 26.5 min/game.
sure looks a lot like these numbers:
17.5 ppg, 3.7 apg, 3.0pg, 1.0 spg, 46% 3PT FG (remember, the bigger this number the BETTER it its) 34 min/game
done with this thread, either you understand the point or you don't.
Stojakovic said:http://www.nba.com/playerfile/emanuel_ginobili/index.html?nav=page
Not according to NBA.com , but I guess that site isn't trustworthy.
I think you're the one who needs to check his "facts".
bigbadred00 said:My point is slow Webber is averaging 2.00 per 48 while Manu the theif is averaging 2.7 per 48. I guess that's a huge difference but it really isn't.
jeffjcalweb said:we posted the same link, what are you looking at???? how are you saying his numbers aren't what i posted??? we used the same freaking link, look at the 04-05 numbers. it isn't that complicated.
bigbadred00 said:Well Webber is known for not being that fast, being bad on D (personally I think these both are false) but your theif is not much better and he's known as 1 of the best right. Whatever, not the point.
jeffjcalweb said:which is exactly what i said in my first post, mobley's numbers in the 17 games played with the kings. next time, i'll post it in canadian (hehe).
1kingzfan said:While Doug was slowing down and not as good as he had been 1-on-1, he was still the "one man zone", helping not only the defensively-challenged Bibby but the other 3 on the floor, too. All the freakin' time he was helping.
Mobley is probably not that much worse a 1-on-1 defender as Doug, but the other 4 guys are mostly on their own on the floor now. And that has been telling as the Kings have given up 5 points per game more since the Christie-Mobley trade.
This trade, although it gave us mega-more fire power on O than what we ever coulda got outta Doug, I now believe has hampered our defense to the point where we now see a LOT more clearly its weaknesses....crappy PG 1-on-1 defense and poor front line mobility. And these weaknesses, because they are no longer ameliorated by an outstanding all-NBA defensive team player chipping in to assist and mask them somewhat, have now translated into losses. Ugly *** losses on the D end, at that.
Then, to top it all off, although Peja had one big scoring game since the trade, he seems more left out on the offense, and I think that Mobley has had a lot to do with it. In addition, Mike plays the 2-man game too damn much with Webb to the exclusion of Peja and other players on the floor at the time. Previous years we saw a healthy mixture of the 2-man game and the 5-man passing game...and that worked just peachy keen. Not any longer...it's more like 80% 2-man game and 20% all-team passing game.
And Mobley, when he does get the ball, is not looking to pass unless he's sealed off. he's had some nice assists, but I would term the majority of them "forced" assists. This is bad for the team.
I have now come to the conclusion that the Mobley-Christie trade was a bad one for the Kings, a miscalculated error, and not worthy of a 4-year extension for Petrie. Even if another trade to get a better defender inside is made, the Kings' defense has still been altered beyond repair from where it was. I really appreciate Doug's TEAM defense, now that he's gone and I have beared witness to the carnage left behind.
Stojakovic said:And even then, the #'s aren't even close unless you're willing to ignore the minutes (which STILL makes Ginobili better, perhaps even substantially at 8-9 minutes less per game).
This is such a good post^. It's nice to actually read real numbers backing up someones opinion. It's not even just numbers Cats hit big 3's and made key steals in the 4th to win games for us. This thread is just silly, If you want proof just read Jeffjcw's post again, I quoted it. How Manu Ginobili got brought into this discussion is beyond me.jeffjcalweb said:sometimes this board is the equivalent of a elementary school bathroom wall, do some of you even bother to check facts before posting such inane comments as "cuttino is a cancer"??? here's cat's numbers for the 17 games he's played w/the kings:
17.5 ppg, 3.7 apg (yea, real selfsish number there) 3.9 rpg, 1 spg, 46% 3PT FG, 79% FT.
yes you are right, he's horrible fit for this team, can't believe we gave up DC:
6.6 ppg, 2.4apg, 2.8 rpg, 2 spg, 24% 3PT FG ....
please.