can Seth be our starting SG going forward?

biltalent

Starter
I used to see Seth as our 5th guard who can back up both PG and SG in case of injuries. But his recent play has me thinking: can he be our starting SG going forward? It seems like he is already better than Mclemore or anybody else that we tried there and he is a better defender than I thought. But on the other side he is physically limited as he is shorter and weaker than most SGs.

What do you think?
 
No he's a better ball handling less quick Patty Mills he's a good spark plug off the bench, unless Tyreke Evans/Livingston/Turner is out there playing next to him to allow him to defend PG's he's not a starting SG imo. Kids got heart and skills hopefully we keep him and promise him playing time next year so he comes back.

Some props to Vlade he made horrible choices in Belli/KK/Rondo (none have helped us imo), Curry wax a good signing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As of right now he's the best SG on the roster so unless we get an upgrade, I don't see why you wouldn't start him. You give up a little defense by having him in the game over McLemore but what you lose there, you gain by knowing you have a guy who can put up 12-20ppg on a semi regular basis.

The last 7 games Seth has put up 15.3ppg on 52% shooting from 2 and 52% shooting from 3. I'll take that over pretty much any 7 game span McLemore has had and we're basically talking about the first 7 games in Seth's career that he's gotten consistent minutes. Unless he's just playing flash in the pan right now, I don't see why he wouldn't get even better. He also tries hard on defense, which is all you can ask for from any player. Give me Seth and a coach who actually preaches defense over McLemore and Belinelli.
 
I don't think so, unless we bring in a defensive-minded PG. I know people here praise Curry for his defense, but honestly, I don't think he's better than Ben. His peskyness is what helps him a lot.

I think Curry fits best as a 6th/man off the bench. If we promote DC to starting lineup next year, I can see Curry being our 6th man. However, if DC stays on the bench, I could see a duo of DC-Curry.

Curry is proving that he deserves minutes in the NBA. Starting? no way........
 
Personally I'd like to see Curry as the backup PG. Either by letting Rondo walk and making Collison the starter or if Rondo is resigned, by trading Collison to address other roster issues. Of the two options I like letting Rondo leave via free agency more but that's a question for Vlade.

Unless (God forbid) the next coach is also a smallball proponent then it makes little sense to have both Rondo and Collison on the roster IMO. Especially when Curry delivers a lot of what you want in a bench sparkplug.

In either case I'd want the third PG to be a bigger, defensive minded player.
 
He could be our new Bobby Jackson. Scoring PG that can play both guard positions off the bench.

The problem is even Bobby wouldn't have worked out for us is we didn't have so many great passers at other positions.

Seth needs to be more of a PG to be a true 3rd guard type, thing is, at his age that's not likely. I don't even know if you could run the same sets with Seth and Rondo.
 
No he's a better ball handling less quick Patty Mills he's a good spark plug off the bench, unless Tyreke Evans/Livingston/Turner is out there playing next to him to allow him to defend PG's he's not a starting SG imo. Kids got heart and skills hopefully we keep him and promise him playing time next year so he comes back.

Some props to Vlade he made horrible choices in Belli/KK/Rondo (none have helped us imo), Curry wax a good signing.

I like that comp a lot. Great shooter, some playmaking ability, ability to create off his own bounce, undersized combo guard.

I'd have no problem with him being a 3rd guard and being able to play both spots. In fact, I think that's where a lot of his value comes from. The fact he can run some point and fit in off-ball and with star players.
 
Yeah, I agree that Seth playing a good amount of minutes off the bench is probably the best way to utilize him next year and having a big PG next to him would be ideal. Hopefully we bring him back next season because he's one of the few young players we have who's exceeded expectations this year. In the draft Kris Dunn probably has the size to defend SGs so that could be an option if he's still there when we're drafting. I'm not fully sold on his PG skills, but the league seems to be trending toward scoring PGs anyway. I also like Dejounte Murray -- he's probably more of a bench option because I don't see him playing PG full-time in the NBA, but he could be a good fit next to Seth Curry on the bench. He's a bigger guard who can handle the ball, defend wing players, and get to the basket which would make him a good rotation guard. Or another option might be trading Rudy Gay for Tyreke Evans and signing/drafting a SF.

Regardless of ideal fit though, I do think Curry has played well enough to make Collison available in trade. And McLemore is fading into irrelevance for us and probably needs a fresh start somewhere else. I thought his second year showed promise but then he regressed this year. I'd try to work out a trade with Cleveland if Lebron still wants Ben on the team. I was against the idea mid-season, but Ben looks done in Sacramento so I'm warming up to Iman Shumpert as a trade target. His shooting is a problem (though he did have 1 year in New York where he shot 40% from three on 127 attempts), but we'd be getting him to set the tone defensively at SG while we get our scoring punch off the bench from Curry and whoever we get to compliment him. Collison and McLemore for Shumpert works salary-wise. I don't think Rondo/Shumpert is what most people have in mind for an ideal backcourt, but we can explore our options at PG in the off-season. We know we need to get better defensively regardless -- particularly on the perimeter -- and a quality defender at SG would be a good start.
 
I think Seth can be a very a valuable rotation player. He reminds me of CJ McCollum of Portland.

During the draft combine, they were actually measured at a similar size, about 6'2 1/2" with shoes, but Seth is listed at 6'2" and McCollum is listed at 6'4" now.

If Seth were 6'3", he could be a viable starting shooting guard, ala Jason Terry type small SG. I could see Seth starting and averaging about the 13-16 ppg.

I sure hope Seth stays with the Kings for next season and beyond.

If the Kings can move Bellilini and/or McClemore (for a sign and trade for Ryan Anderson???) and draft a Shooting Guard like Hield in the draft, the Kings could make the position a strength next season.
 
No he's a better ball handling less quick Patty Mills he's a good spark plug off the bench, unless Tyreke Evans/Livingston/Turner is out there playing next to him to allow him to defend PG's he's not a starting SG imo. Kids got heart and skills hopefully we keep him and promise him playing time next year so he comes back.

Some props to Vlade he made horrible choices in Belli/KK/Rondo (none have helped us imo), Curry wax a good signing.

Horrible choice in Belli/KK/Rondo? Even Belli is not that. He was a good choice that so far has not worked out. He is not a Vlade mistake. I could add that Curry is not proven. During the real season when we were "trying" Curry, unlike Belli, was not played. But I agree Curry should make a good 6th or 7th man. I like him.
 
I see Curry as more of a PG. If the other guard can handle the ball and defend the bigger guards like Thompson and Butler then you can call them whatever you want to. If Curry is your SG the "PG" needs to be 6'6".
 
Well let's first see if he returns...I don't see it happening but I'd like to be wrong. Second, unless he grows a few more inches, no..he isn't a starting SG unless you want to be a lottery team again.
 
Back
Top