Britney loses custody of kids

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=3676547&page=1

Britney Spears Loses Custody of Kids
Attorney Speculates Judge Has 'Given Up' on the Pop Star
By SHEILA MARIKAR
Oct. 1, 2007


After months of courtroom drama and much speculation about her parenting abilities, Britney Spears was ordered Monday to surrender custody of her two children to her ex-husband, Kevin Federline.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Scott M. Gordon ruled that Federline will take custody of 2-year-old Sean Preston and 1-year-old Jayden James beginning Wednesday "until further order of the court," The Associated Press reported.

According to Beverly Hills family law attorney Daniel Jaffe, the judge has probably lost faith in the former pop princess's ability to be a fit parent.

"The court must have felt that the kids are in danger with her," Jaffe said. "This would be an unusual order, but, as you can see in the tabloids, she hasn't been behaving properly."

"It sounds like the judge has basically given up on her, because she hasn't been complying with court orders," he added.

This is the latest development in the ongoing battle between Spears and Federline over the well-being of their children. In September, Gordon ordered Spears to meet with a parenting coach who was supposed to observe and report back to the court about her fitness as a parent. He said that both she and Federline had to complete the court's Parenting Without Conflict class.

The judge also ordered Spears to undergo random drug and alcohol testing twice a week, because she was engaging in "habitual, frequent and continuous use of controlled substances and alcohol," according to The Associated Press.

On Sept. 22, Spears was charged with multiple misdemeanor counts of hit-and-run and driving without a valid license after she allegedly rammed her car into another in August. While that incident can't do anything to help her reputation in the public eye, Jaffe said, it probably didn't factor into Monday's court order.

Jaffe speculated that after Spears, 25, hands over custody of her sons to Federline, 29, a custody evaluator will be appointed to assess which parent will be better for the kids. It could take months before a final decision is made.

"That's a long process," Jaffe said. "Probably three to six months to get a full psychological report, at which time the psychological evaluator will tell the judge who is a more fit parent."
 
Jaffe speculated that after Spears, 25, hands over custody of her sons to Federline, 29, a custody evaluator will be appointed to assess which parent will be better for the kids. It could take months before a final decision is made.

"That's a long process," Jaffe said. "Probably three to six months to get a full psychological report, at which time the psychological evaluator will tell the judge who is a more fit parent."

That gives me chills. Kind of like trying to decide whether it would be better to let the kids loose in the forest with pork chops around their necks or allow them to play tag on the 405 during rush hour.
 
you knew things were bad when federline was looking like the better parent.

poor kids... i hope this works out of the best for them.
 
What a damn shame. After going through that whole breakdown thing, the last thing that should be on her mind is not being able to see her kids. :(
 
You know, I remember about eight years ago, when both Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera made it big, and I said that Christina was going to end up being better at, basically, every aspect of life: better singer (well, she already was), bigger star, more respected performer, and all-around better human being, and people said I was nuts, especially after that Stripped phase... I'm not looking so nuts right now...
 
Maybe it will motivate her to clean up her life.

Doubtful.

Apparently she turned over the kids two days before she was required to and then dashed off to the tanning salon. She didn't seem particularly distraught to be losing her children.
 
That gives me chills. Kind of like trying to decide whether it would be better to let the kids loose in the forest with pork chops around their necks or allow them to play tag on the 405 during rush hour.

And you know Federline is happy. He'll get a continuance of her money by default.
 
How bad is your parenting skills when a judge rules that K-Fed is the more responsible parent (and I'm using that term loosely) of the two? :eek:
 
And you know Federline is happy. He'll get a continuance of her money by default.


Ooh..snarky but true. Hadn't thought of thatr. Was wondering why a washed up party boy wanted them so bad. Thanks for lowering my opinion of the whole mess yet another notch. :p
 
Back
Top