I’m the cynic and I think this might have legs.
The logical conclusion is this – if the Maloofs don’t want to sell, the NBA can’t force them. They move to Anaheim with the name Royals, and all of the history. Because it’s still very unclear whether Sacramento can get an arena done, Sacramento doesn’t get to keep the history of the team (Browns deserved it and the NBA used it as a bargaining chip to settle a lawsuit.)
Sacramento has a year (the lockout), to come up with an arena plan. If so, “next season” 2012-13, the “Hornets” go to Sacramento, who gets the name Kings and all of the history and the Maloof Anaheim franchise gets new name and colors and no history.
If the city rallies, and they might with the team and the Maloofs gone, the city somehow committed to funding this by June, which is probably when the NBA will return for a final vote on this. Just pull the trigger now. At which point, you can’t force the Maloofs to give up Cousins and Evans (but they take their players and front office to Anaheim) the Hornets become the “Kings.” Odd. But it’s happened before, Celts/Braves. Times are different, but it’s the way this works out if the Maloofs won’t sell and the owners have a “Good Son” choice between Sacramento and New Orleans.
It would be weird to “turn” on players like Evans, but the short term change would be offset by having owners that could do things like spend money.