Harkless expiring. Silva has a 1.8 mil team option for next season.What are the contracts of Harkless and Silva?
Not sure I really get this one, other than Harkless I guess is a more viable big off the bench vs. Metu at this point.
What would you have preferred we do with Bjeli instead then? It’s not like teams were lining up for the privilege of giving up a valuable asset for a 32 year old chubby dude who’s only shooting 29% from three this year and can’t play defense.It’s simple
we are trying to corner the market on 27 year old role players in a desperate attempt to make the 10 spot.
What would you have preferred we do with Bjeli instead then? It’s not like teams were lining up for the privilege of giving up a valuable asset for a 32 year old chubby dude who’s only shooting 29% from three this year and can’t play defense.
I would have preferred a second or two. So for we appear to have sent out 3 seconds.
Two, really. The Lakers pick this year (probably 60) and our second in 2024, when we already have the Blazers pick anyways.
The Clippers trade really sorta only involved those picks as a formality given the protections on them.
I can understand coveting 1st round picks but after a while 2nd round picks can become more trouble than they’re worth
No.did we send a 2nd with Bjelicia?
Harkless 1.4 PPG,6'7" F-G,
Silva 2.7 PPG, 6'8" F
Cant see either in the future for the Kings
Monte, You got your pocket picked
not a single pick in the deal? WTF
I mean, while I would like Woodard and DQJ to see more time, it’s not like this move pushes them any further down the depth chart and it may help the team in the long run by solidifying the defenseso knowing we will probably play Harkless over our young guys what are your thoughts on it?
He was a huge reason Portland made noise a couple of years ago. Blazers have been trying and failing to replicate his defensive presence ever since.I have always liked Harkless. Dude is huge and will be a much better wing defender than most think. Would love to sign him to a two year, reasonable contract.
Because I think Woodard or DQJ are better than either of these guysand why is that?
He was definitely good in Portland.He was a huge reason Portland made noise a couple of years ago. Blazers have been trying and failing to replicate his defensive presence ever since.
I honestly don’t mind it too much, it wasn’t too long ago a lot of us on this board were suggesting picking him up. I think he’s had some solid wings in front of him in Miami like Iggy and Crowder and his toughness on D is more than welcome around these parts. I am hoping he is more of an impact player for us than he apparently has been for themso knowing we will probably play Harkless over our young guys what are your thoughts on it?
He was a huge reason Portland made noise a couple of years ago. Blazers have been trying and failing to replicate his defensive presence ever since.
Would rather have kept Beli for rest of the year
My definition of getting a bag of Cheesy poofs for Beli
Unfortunately we'd have basically had to renounce everyone to even offer him 12mil per which gets us back to where we were entering this season. I would not be terribly disappointed if we traded him today. Because I don't think he is remotely as valuable to the Kings at double his current contract.Holmes is worth more than the MLE in my estimation.