Bee: Sam Amick's 1st half grades

#1
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/113969.html

Kings' midseason report card: Opportunity knocks for extra credit

Low marks could provide motivation to improve game

By Sam Amick - Bee Staff Writer

Last Updated 1:10 am PST Friday, January 26, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1


It goes without saying that this very midseason report card was the underlying inspiration to the Kings' turnaround last season.


Presumptuous and borderline egotistical? Absolutely. But facts are facts, and chances are, a team that was 24-29 when grades came out last February didn't rush to the refrigerator to post the marks that included nary an "A" among the players, coaches or front office.


Then suddenly, mysteriously, there came a 20-9 finish and the playoffs to boot. Fine, go ahead and give Ron Artest some credit if you must.

So as a service to the fans who drag themselves to the couch to watch this bunch in action, the critique comes earlier and with a side experiment of seeing if the record will, in fact, improve from here.


In truth, the Kings' situation, at 17-23, is more desperate than last season's for several reasons. The Artest effect, for one, is a term that has taken on a whole different meaning from last year. And the prospect of another blockbuster deal that saves the season seems slim, with the idea of a turnaround taking on a timeline of months -- or years -- rather than weeks.


"We want to take our time," Kings co-owner Gavin Maloof said last week. "We want to be methodical. But one thing that (Kings president of basketball operations) Geoff (Petrie) has done is he hasn't mortgaged our future with big long-term contracts. The future is promising, and people have to look at that.
"To pick a trade and do this and do that with no plan, that's not what we're about. That's not what the future's about. Our future salaries are not exorbitant. We can turn this thing around."

Shareef Abdur-Rahim

Aside from his jaw staying intact this season, it's much the same story line for Abdur-Rahim. He wants to start, but remains professional when he doesn't. What he hasn't done is offer any sort of imposing defensive presence in the paint. And although he remains the team's best offensive post player, his inability to pass better out of double teams or rebound better hurt the team. His assist-to-turnover ratio of 3.4 is the worst on the team. • Grade: C-

Ron Artest

No one seems to care whose team it is now, either because they realized that conversation was futile or because pride in ownership justifiably has declined. Competitive nature brought out the worst in Artest early, when he refused to worry about shot selection as long as he was the one shooting. His play is on a serious rise recently, and he appears to have contained the fiery frustration that affected him and his teammates. His defense isn't what it was last season. • Grade: C

Mike Bibby

He's putting up a career-low field-goal percentage (38.6) and his lowest scoring average (17.4 points per game) since the 2002-03 season. His three-point percentage (29.6) is the second-lowest of his career. All in all, the season that could determine his possible free-agent value has been a disaster. An early revival in Bibby's defensive focus didn't last long, and a hot streak that lasted from late December to mid-January has been followed by an average of 13.3 points over the past eight games. • Grade: D+

Quincy Douby

The rookie's 21-point outing against Golden State on Dec. 30 seemed a good indicator that the kid can play at this level, but otherwise, his impact has been minimal. • Grade: C+

Francisco García

The second-year swingman has had his best games recently, with his energy and defensive presence being utilized as they should have been earlier this season. They likely would have been if García hadn't launched so many three-pointers early in the shot clock. Of his 132 field-goal attempts, 57 are threes. • Grade: C

Jason Hart

The veteran point guard wants to be traded or waived, and he won't be playing much anytime soon. He has played in just 12 games. • Grade: Incomplete.

Kevin Martin

At last season's All-Star break, the Kings were 10-1 in games in which Martin scored 20-plus points, but they are 8-12 in such games this season. Such is the reality of being a core player rather than a surprise sub. Martin must do more, both because he's capable and because he's already been benched on numerous occasions for not providing the intangibles. Still, his offensive numbers are superb, and his future is as bright as any young player in the league. • Grade: B+

(more)
 
#2
Brad Miller

As one fan calls him, "Teflon Brad" should be held accountable. The team's second-highest-paid player has been off the mark when he wasn't missing 11 games (injury, illness, family reasons). His 45.0 percent shooting is the second-worst of his nine-year career, and his 10-point average is his lowest since the 2000-01 season in Chicago. After leading the team in assists for much of last season, he's had just six-plus assists twice this season. Defensively, he may be the biggest liability among the league's 7-footers. • Grade: D+

Vitaly Potapenko

Having played in only two games, the Kings are waiting to either use Potapenko's expiring contract in a trade or watch his $3.6 million salary come off the books after the season. • Grade: Incomplete.

Ronnie Price

He is the master of the highlight, as athletic a player as there is on the roster and exciting to watch. But since Douby scored 21 against the Warriors, Price has played more than one minute just once in the past 12 games. • Grade: C+

John Salmons

One of the few highlights on and off the floor, his minutes and production dropped off in January after a solid December. It could be argued that he's been more of a defensive stopper than Artest, and the versatility that inspired the Kings to sign him has held true. Salmons' three-point percentage (36.4) is second only to Martin among the regulars. • Grade: B

Kenny Thomas

Aside from some superb defensive outings early, Thomas has had a painfully quiet season. He received a directive early to focus on defense and rebounding, and even the fans agonized when he had a bad run of missed layups and offensive struggles. His latest outing (14 points on 7-for-8 shooting with nine rebounds Wednesday night against Milwaukee) should be a reminder that he can provide easy buckets when the defense is focused elsewhere. • Grade: D+

Justin Williams

Cut in training camp before playing in the NBA Development League, the rookie big man, who recently signed consecutive 10-day contracts, finally won a roster spot Thursday for the rest of the season. His defense and rebounding are much-needed. • Grade: B+

Corliss Williamson

He said he wasn't done yet, and he was right. The 12-year veteran forward is back to his solid, scoring ways. He is averaging 8.6 points and 18.2 minutes, often providing punch in the worst of offensive droughts. What's more, his energy is consistent, a claim many of his teammates can't make. • Grade: B+

Coaching

There has been much more than idle frustration in the Kings' locker room, with the losses setting a bad tone, but coach Eric Musselman's tactics have not helped. There had been long stretches in which player control seemed to be an issue. An early passive acceptance that this was a jump-shooting team led to many losses, despite the fact that many of the same players won late last season with a post-heavy style. And all that talk of an improved defense? Entering Thursday, the Kings ranked 21st in the league in points allowed (101 per game) and 22nd in opponents' field-goal percentage (46.3). • Grade: D+


Front office


Not signing Bonzi Wells was, it turns out, as good as non-moves get. But that was Wells' doing more than Kings exec Geoff Petrie's. Now, the lack of frontcourt athleticism remains the void that Petrie can't seem to fill, with the Williams signing coming after others failed to fill the role (Potapenko, Loren Woods, Maurice Taylor). The Salmons signing has panned out thus far. Petrie might be ripe for another big move, with Bibby's possible free agency looming and a change of the core likely. • Grade: C
 
Last edited:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#4
Pretty fair assessment, IMHO.

I don't like some of the things I've read but it's not Amick's fault that Martin has "already been benched on numerous occasions for not providing the intangibles."

...coach Eric Musselman's tactics have not helped. There had been long stretches in which player control seemed to be an issue. An early passive acceptance that this was a jump-shooting team led to many losses, despite the fact that many of the same players won late last season with a post-heavy style. And all that talk of an improved defense? Entering Thursday, the Kings ranked 21st in the league in points allowed (101 per game) and 22nd in opponents' field-goal percentage (46.3). • Grade: D+
Spot on. Musselman, as the rudder of this ship named the SS Kings, often seems to be made of paper instead of steel, bending with the tide and never maintaining any kind of consistent course.

The mere fact that we, as loyal Kings fans, are reduced to arguing about whether or not the front office should tank the season is an indication of how deep the problems go.

But, as always, I still love this team. GO KINGS!!!
 
#5
Well, with this out of his way, maybe Muss can concentrate on coaching:

Kings coach pleads no contest to DUI

Sacramento Kings coach Eric Musselman pleaded no contest Thursday in connection with his October arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol....
 
#6
Well, with this out of his way, maybe Muss can concentrate on coaching:

Kings coach pleads no contest to DUI

Sacramento Kings coach Eric Musselman pleaded no contest Thursday in connection with his October arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol....
Actually I think he's going to have to concentrate on being suspended by the league.
 
#9
How you give our front office a passing grade is beyond me.

Id be interested in seeing Brick's version of midseason grades.
 
Last edited:

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#10
How you give our front office a passing grade is beyond me.

Id be interested in season Brick's version of midseason grades.
cfetcher already put a lot of work into his/hers (?) -- up ont he front page I think.

Amick did not do terribly here...given his circumstances. Asking the team's beat reporter to hand out imidseason grades is a bit tough/ridiculous. he may or may not have a feel for what's going on with the team, but he's also got to walk into the lockerroom after every game and interview these guys, think he flys with them etc. Needs access. Rather severely constrains what he can/will say I would think.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
#11
Front Office Grade is a D....

...in my grade book. Petrie has been operating under the wishful delusion that he could take veterans of average talent and trade for veterans of above average talent in order to build a championship contender. First he started with the delusion that Peja, Bibby and Brad could be the core of his rebuilding process. When was the last time you ever heard of three players as unathletic as the above trio ever being the core of a championship team? The only team comparable was Bird's Boston Celtics, but all three were tough as nails and all three could play in the post -- none of Petrie's trio can play in the post and 2 of the 3 were definitely not tough. Then after seeing on the court that his strategy was flawed, he traded for Artest, hoping for a new core veteran trio. Even the Ron Artest for Stoyachovich trade belies Petrie's strategy because while Artest does have more talent than Peja, he has more risk as well. There's no free lunch with that trade. Petrie got a better player who could self-destruct at any time. So, what has Petrie done? He's been spinning his wheels for two years when he could have been building a young athletic team. The only reason I don't give him an F is because he's drafted very well....I just wish he would use that talent to get more draft picks for this draft...
 
#12
He has some decent grades comments. I agree with pretty much all of it. Muss's grade/comments were good but not harsh enough. He has to have a little more of the blame this season, and the grade doesn't really match what he said.

Still like Bricks grades/comments better :) I am thinking he should be the team reporter.
 
#13
...in my grade book. Petrie has been operating under the wishful delusion that he could take veterans of average talent and trade for veterans of above average talent in order to build a championship contender...
You assume that GP is totally running the show, even when it came to the Artest trade.

I am not under the impression that the Maloofs, Petrie and Muss all agree 100% about everything, I suspect that Petrie is using most of his remaining mojo to try to slow/reduce/block things which he disagrees with.

So while I would agree that management/owners don't deserve a good grade, I'm not prepared to lay it entirely on Petrie's doorstep. The mistakes may not be his, and the internal conflicts may be as much to blame as is the perspective of any particular manager. It may be that nothing good is happening because there isn't much they can agree on.
 
#14
I am not under the impression that the Maloofs, Petrie and Muss all agree 100% about everything, I suspect that Petrie is using most of his remaining mojo to try to slow/reduce/block things which he disagrees with.
I know exactly the point you're making but no way would I expect them all to agree. Hopefully they are smart enough to sift through it all and get / make the best moves.
 
#15
I know exactly the point you're making but no way would I expect them all to agree. Hopefully they are smart enough to sift through it all and get / make the best moves.
My impression is that a lot of decision making is going on via phone calls between Muss and the Maloofs, and that GP is often out of the loop. Which is not at all to say that he's blameless, more that we can't really know who to blame for what.

"Hopefully"... but I'm not ready to bet the rent money on it.