I think it would be hilarious if STOP and Crown Downtown could somehow unite and stop this purchase. Surely we can get by with a $4M piece of art and hire a few cops and firemen with the left over money.
The money has to be spent on public art, so it can't be spent on anything else. I kind of like it, myself and it would be a huge coup for Sacramento to have a piece of art from an artist this famous.
Unless they pick something horribly mundane and boring, there will be some who like it and some who don't. I've rarely heard of any decent piece of art that didn't arouse strong feelings both for and against it. The Indo Arch outside the Holiday Inn at the downtown plaza aroused extreme loathing and calls for its removal when it was installed. Now most people don't even notice it. Its just part of the Sacramento landscape.
I'll guarantee the Cloud Gate sculpture in Chicago caused exactly the type of comments being posted here from people hating it. However, its absolutely an iconic piece of art in Chicago now and countless people go to that place just to see the sculpture and have their picture taken next to it. By the way, it cost $23 million
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_Gate
Edit: I totally respect that some people don't like this piece of art. I don't like all art, either. You can't possibly please everybody with a piece of art. Even if they pick a piece of art I don't like, I would not try and stop it, unless it were obviously pornographic or bigoted. I don't have to like all public art and I don't. But I respect art and feel there should be many different types of art, especially including art that evokes strong responses, positive and negative. If art doesn't evoke strong feelings, the artist may have missed the mark.
I should point out that it won't be the city council picking the art. Its usually a commission of local art experts who make the recommendation.
I like art. I'm cool with going outside the box and don't mind the rabbit.
It appears Mr. Koons is a world renowned talent. From the stories I've seen, I like some of this other stuff.
The real issue here is we are buying a crappy piece by Mr. Koons. It's not objectively a good Koons piece.
This is so Sacramento. We have a statue by Koon guys!!! Oh, cool one of the balloon dogs? No. The big Scotty dog? No. Balloon flowers? No. The broken open egg? No. Uh, what did you guys get? One of the coloring books. Oh ... uh ... that's cool.
Ok, so his balloon dog goes for 50 million and the 5th and worst of his coloring books goes for 8. Will you do a purple balloon sword for 12 million? Cool. Vivek, get out your check book. Fans are pissed and you can be the hero for 6 million.
I like art. I'm cool with going outside the box and don't mind the rabbit.
It appears Mr. Koons is a world renowned talent. From the stories I've seen, I like some of this other stuff.
The real issue here is we are buying a crappy piece by Mr. Koons. It's not objectively a good Koons piece.
This is so Sacramento. We have a statue by Koon guys!!! Oh, cool one of the balloon dogs? No. The big Scotty dog? No. Balloon flowers? No. The broken open egg? No. Uh, what did you guys get? One of the coloring books. Oh ... uh ... that's cool.
Ok, so his balloon dog goes for 50 million and the 5th and worst of his coloring books goes for 8. Will you do a purple balloon sword for 12 million? Cool. Vivek, get out your check book. Fans are pissed and you can be the hero for 6 million.
This is my main concern too. Coloring Book is never going to be seen as iconic or original. Nor is it as concise as the pieces Koons is known for. When I google-image "public art installation" Coloring Book doesn't begin to rank among the most striking or visually appealing pieces. Though without a price tag next to each picture it's hard to form an opinion of what the city should buy.
But I do think there is significant value that the piece and the direction the city is going when choosing pieces that was going overlooked in this thread. Padrino said it best in his post on the previous page.
So, just wondering, what pieces of his would you recommend for placement in front of our arena? Just curious.
Overly expensive Art Statue 3.0 in front of the arena!
![]()
Only 8 million dollars, what a bargain.
Snobbish and condescending?
Aw, our little sports board is growing up.
So, just wondering, what pieces of his would you recommend for placement in front of our arena? Just curious.
Balloon Flower:
![]()
Most importantly it immediately looks nice. It's also in Jeff Koons' well known balloon style. At the same time, by not being an immediately recognizable figure such as a Balloon Dog, it naturally becomes part of the environment rather than distract from it.
Thanks for taking my request seriously, I was wondering what you would like.
Again, while different, it isn't what I would think would be appropriate in front of the arena. But apparently I am just an ignorant rube when it comes to "art", so I am just going to accept that something like this is inevitable and not worry about it. I still think it is a shame we couldn't get anything to represent Sacramento in a more historical light, but whatever.
I actually think coloring book works better than those in the context in which it will be placed. From the looks of the renderings, the arena and surroundings are going to be very modern, stark, metallic almost. The translucent splashes of color will offer a very different lens to view it all. The alternatives (not just of Koons, but mostly the Pony Express, etc) suggested here simply don't fit as well, IMHO.
Not from local art experts and at least one local art professor I heard interviewed today. Local arts people seem quite excited. Note that this will not be the only piece of public art at the development site.This art isn't invoking strong feelings for and against it on its merits, its invoking disdain and mockery.![]()
I think something honoring our city's rich heritage combined with a modern touch would be great. Not saying this is the epitome of art by any means, but consider something like these:
![]()
This is Grandfather's Horse, a horse statue made of car bumpers in Wichita. It honors the man's grandfather who helped establish a town in Kansas. Given the agricultural and ranching heritage in this area and the Pony Express, something horse-related isn't a stretch.
Or an abstract take on a train given our long history with locomotives here (Locomotive, in Germany):
![]()
Or perhaps something honoring our place as the state capitol, such as the grizzly bear from our flag (this one is more traditional, but you could do all kinds of things with something similar):
![]()
There are a lot of ways you can honor the history of a location with art. Plopping random colors on a mirror doesn't do that. Well done statues can evoke a sense of place in history and respect for our past while still being works of art. The above are just a couple examples of a starting point for a conversation or idea on different things that could honor our history and make the art represent Sacramento in some manner.
Again, I am not saying these are great examples but at least something I would consider to be better than stuff this guy puts out. I mean, who wouldn't want this in front of the new ESC?
http://www.jeffkoons.com/artwork/pre-new/nelson-automatic-cooker-deep-fryer
SMH.
#herewepolitelyaskforbetterartfor8million
Doesn't exactly roll off the tounge
I think it would be hilarious if STOP and Crown Downtown could somehow unite and stop this purchase. Surely we can get by with a $4M piece of art and hire a few cops and firemen with the left over money.
I think something honoring our city's rich heritage combined with a modern touch would be great. Not saying this is the epitome of art by any means, but consider something like these:
![]()
This is Grandfather's Horse, a horse statue made of car bumpers in Wichita. It honors the man's grandfather who helped establish a town in Kansas. Given the agricultural and ranching heritage in this area and the Pony Express, something horse-related isn't a stretch.
Or an abstract take on a train given our long history with locomotives here (Locomotive, in Germany):
![]()
Or perhaps something honoring our place as the state capitol, such as the grizzly bear from our flag (this one is more traditional, but you could do all kinds of things with something similar):
![]()
There are a lot of ways you can honor the history of a location with art. Plopping random colors on a mirror doesn't do that. Well done statues can evoke a sense of place in history and respect for our past while still being works of art. The above are just a couple examples of a starting point for a conversation or idea on different things that could honor our history and make the art represent Sacramento in some manner.
Again, I am not saying these are great examples but at least something I would consider to be better than stuff this guy puts out. I mean, who wouldn't want this in front of the new ESC?
http://www.jeffkoons.com/artwork/pre-new/nelson-automatic-cooker-deep-fryer
SMH.
I don't like the art work by Koons that's being suggested.
I honestly do not care for art but Damon of CDT found a work of art that I actually like better and could be used in similar fashion of Slamson.
![]()
Not from local art experts and at least one local art professor I heard interviewed today. Local arts people seem quite excited. Note that this will not be the only piece of public art at the development site.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/city-beat/article11253440.html