A Stat Thread: Numbers Thus Far

[Bricklayer]

So I've normally done one of these every year at some point in the early season. This time I want to look at +/- stats, per 36 min numbers (so that min played is factored out) and team ranks.

Numbers per 36 Thus Far in the Season
Cousins 18.7pts (.430 .000 .779) 13.1reb 0.7ast 1.4stl 2.3blk 4.0TO 6.2FL
Thornto 17.8pts (.411 .349 .872) _ 3.8reb 1.6ast 1.7stl 0.1blk 2.1TO 2.0FL
T.Evans 17.6pts (.424 .214 .747) _ 4.8reb 4.2ast 1.5stl 0.5blk 3.0TO 1.9FL
Thomas 16.3pts (.348 .300 .857) _ 3.7reb 4.3ast 1.7stl 0.4blk 3.3TO 1.2FL
Thomps 13.5pts (.569 .000 .370) _ 7.8reb 1.8ast 0.9stl 0.4blk 1.2TO 3.5FL
GReene 13.0pts (.391 .227 .600) _ 8.0reb 0.6ast 0.6stl 1.1blk 1.4TO 3.6FL
J.Fredet 11.9pts (.345 .283 .923) _ 2.4reb 3.3ast 1.0stl 0.0blk 2.4TO 1.8FL
Hickson 10.2pts (.368 .000 .659) 10.6reb 1.2ast 0.7stl 0.7blk 2.5TO 1.9FL
F.Garcia - 9.5pts (.366 .350 .714) _ 3.9reb 1.6ast 1.4stl 1.2blk 0.7TO 2.5FL
Salmons - 9.4pts (.355 .182 .750) - 4.5reb 2.3ast 1.4stl 0.2blk 1.4TO 3.0FL
TOutlaw _ 8.3pts (.239 .118 .615) - 4.7reb 0.5ast 1.0stl 1.3blk 1.0TO 1.8FL
C.Hayes _ 8.0pts (.419 .000 .750) 11.0reb 2.1ast 0.7stl 0.5blk 1.4TO 4.3FL

-- our 3 main guys ar notable in all shooting above .400 this seson. A feat matched only by 4th starter Hayes and Jason.
-- its perhaps not surprising that peole are calling for Donte and Jason to start next to Reke, Boogie and Thornton, with Thomas as our 6th man. Those have been the 6 most proiductive players on the roster thus far.
-- what ever happedn to Jason the rebouding fool? Thus far this year he's being outrebound by Donte Greene.

FGA/per 36 (an indicator of who's gunning in his minutes)
Cousins 15.4
Thronton 15.4
Evans 14.6
Thomas 13.7
Fredette 12.9
Greene 12.7
Outlaw 12.0
Salmons 10.8
Thomsp 10.5
Outlaw 9.9
Cisco 9.5
Hayes 7.6

-- again perhaps the urge to start Thompson and Cisco can be understood through these numbers. Alongside Hayes, nobody else acts the part of the roleplayer so well. You can see little Zeke guns almost as much as Reke.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offensive/Defensive +/- Stats per 82 Games.com
Offensive per 100 possessions
Greene +10.9
Outlaw +10.6
Cousins +5.0
Hickson +4.2
Thronton +2.7
Thomas +2.6
Evans +2.1
Salmons -0.2
Hayes -5.5
Fredette -8.2
Garcia -9.6
Thomps -11.7

Defensive per 100 possessions (negative = fewer points scored against)
Evans -9.3
Thomps -4.6
Garcia -4.1
Salmons -2.8
Thronton -2.1
Hayes -1.8
Hickson +0.2
Cousins +0.6
Greene +1.6
Fredette +2.0
Thomas +7.7
Outlaw +15.5

OVERALL per 100 possessions
Evans +11.4
Greene +9.3
Thronton +4.7
Cousins +4.4
Hickson +4.0
Salmons +2.6
Hayes -3.7
Outlaw -4.9
Thomas -5.1
Garcia -5.5
Thomps -7.1
Fredette -10.2

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team Ranks
Pts For: 90.1 (25th)
Pts Opp: 101.8 (29th)
Pt Differ: -11.7 (29th)
Team FG% .396 (30th)
Opp FG% .478 (29th)
Team 3pt% .258 (29th)
Team FT% .736 (20th)
Reb Diff: -2.9 (t-26th)
Team TO: 15.9 (t-24th)
Assists: 14.6 (30th)
Steals: 8.2 (t-12th)
Blocks: 4.4 (t-22nd)

May I humbly suggest to Geoff that we were doing better with our big crew by the end of last year than we are with the selfish midgets he went out and replaced them with? According to the stats we are good at virtually nothing. Here's our 1 ray:

Hoopdata.com Shots At Rim
Reke 6.1 (12th in NBA)
Cousins 6.0 (15th in NBA)

Since getting to the rim is how you win inthe NBA and everybody else on those lists with the exception of Javale McGee is a major star. However given that Cousin's FG% in there is an abysmal .487 (worst in the Top 30 at least) maybe its not sucha great thing.

 

[rainmaker]

Good to see those stats.

I however, have never liked Cisco, and am not thrilled about once again, for like the 5th consecutive year, looking for him to give our sf spot, and starting lineup a boost. But the numbers don't lie, and he is a better option than Salmons.

Ideally, I'm running Donte out there at the 3, and JT at the 4. Don't think Smart will do that though, as my guess is he'd rather use Donte as a backup stretch 4. In terms of sf's on our roster, it's Donte> Cisco> Salmons. But given the girl scouts in our FO thought losing Daly and only bringing in Hayes would solidify our frontline, we don't have the depth to start Donte at the 3. Damnit!

JT is the obvious choice now at pf, but then of course we don;t have any defensive bigs on the bench, which is why I think Smart was hesitant to put JT in the starting lineup.

This off season killed us though. Most cap space in the league, and here we are clamoring for Cisco and JT to save the day, and actually fit in with our 3 building blocks. Imagine that, JT and Cisco again. Seems like we're stuck in a Sac version of groundhog day.

 

[King Baller]

Seems like we're stuck in a Sac version of groundhog day.

Ain't it the truth! Save us Donte and JT!

KB

 

[Gliesian]

Thanks! Cousins' fouling is abysmal. When does he get Shaq rights??

 

[IfAt1st]

This off season killed us though. Most cap space in the league, and here we are clamoring for Cisco and JT to save the day, and actually fit in with our 3 building blocks. Imagine that, JT and Cisco again. Seems like we're stuck in a Sac version of groundhog day.

bingo bingo!

Dumping the most reliable, steading King (Beno) and picking up Salmons on the gamble that he would magically play the best ball of his life has simply murdered this season.
It was clear to everyone here (and elsewhere) that the Kings HAD to spend money to get a stud at SF in the off-season.
No excuses, no maybes, no projected stats - someone who is an experienced, proven force on an NBA court. They didn't get that guy and so they're back to the same-old Donte/Cisco/(Omri)/now-Honeycutt-and-Outlaw pipe-dream that has proven not to work for years.

 

[Capt. Factorial]

picking up Salmons on the gamble that he would magically play the best ball of his life has simply murdered this season.

I don't know where you get the idea that we hoped Salmons would play the best ball of his life. Salmons is currently playing the WORST ball of his life - far, far worse than we could ever have expected. He's shooting .355 from the floor, 85 points lower than his career average, and .182 from three, 181 points lower than his career average. Yet somehow by +/- he's our sixth-best player and still in the positive. We didn't need, or look for some magic Best Salmons Ever. If we had merely gotten Career-Average Salmons we wouldn't even be complaining about him given all the other problems we have in front of us.

 

[VF21]

bingo bingo!

Dumping the most reliable, steading King (Beno) and picking up Salmons on the gamble that he would magically play the best ball of his life has simply murdered this season.
It was clear to everyone here (and elsewhere) that the Kings HAD to spend money to get a stud at SF in the off-season.
No excuses, no maybes, no projected stats - someone who is an experienced, proven force on an NBA court. They didn't get that guy and so they're back to the same-old Donte/Cisco/(Omri)/now-Honeycutt-and-Outlaw pipe-dream that has proven not to work for years.

I only have one problem with that statement. Somehow, people assume that there is a stud SF out there willing to come to Sacramento. Let's be realistic. At this point in time, doing so would in most minds be an open admission that you're willing to bury your career in a mudbog, with only a spider web as a lifeline...

 

[The_Jamal]

Plus, who the hell were we going to get on the FA market anyway? Ak47 didn't want to come over and I seriously doubt Caron or Prince would want to play for a bottom feeder team at this point in their careers. Hell, I'm surprised Chuck came here when he could have been apart of any contenders rotation and gotten near the same amount of money

 

[Italics]

As fun as it is to discuss who should and shouldn't start, the fact of the matter is this: None of it will ever matter until this team learns how to play like a team and run actual plays. Until then, the team will perform horribly. Some players will score a lot. A few games will be won here and there. But this team will continue to be awful REGARDLESS of anything else until a system gets put into place which utilizes each player's talents.

 

[VF21]

...Hell, I'm surprised Chuck came here when he could have been apart of any contenders rotation and gotten near the same amount of money

It's kind of like the surprise a lot of Kings fans felt when Vlade agreed to come here.

 

[ParniValjak]

Plus, who the hell were we going to get on the FA market anyway? Ak47 didn't want to come over and I seriously doubt Caron or Prince would want to play for a bottom feeder team at this point in their careers. Hell, I'm surprised Chuck came here when he could have been apart of any contenders rotation and gotten near the same amount of money

Pistons aren't exactly world beaters are they?!

The problem is that our moves were one mistake after another. Lets be a bit realistic about this.

After the all-star break last season (more specifically since the Landry-Thornton trade) we started clicking. We had the front court rotation down pat to the point where we were flat our dominant in some games. Dalembert-Cousins-Thompson was the makings of one of the best frontcourts in the league and our play started to show it. Everyone was getting minutes in their spots, everyone was effective and that is because all 3 players complemented each other and all 3 players had some length which made us difficult to match up on.

We also had a great 3 guard rotation despite Tyreke's trouble with his foot. Beno was worth his weight in gold to us. He was that steady veteran, the leader that would settle the side and get the ball to the right player at the right time. He could plan off the ball which made him even more valuable. Important fact here was that he was willing to play his role as a 3rd guard. Its as good a guard rotation as you could hope for.

The only real hole we had was the SF position. Now that hole is still there but we have some $19million per season committed to it and we are no better. But in the process of "addressing" that hole we have created more holes in the frontcourt and backcourt.

I am still not sure how could people look at our team towards the end of last season and one at the star of this season and say that we are better. We are actually worse off and some of us have been saying it from the start!

 

[Larry89]

christ look at those turnovers

 

[est.1999]

All I have to say about this is thank god for the 49ers and Jim Harbaugh. This kings franchise is a freaking joke. Horrible owners. Horrible coaching. I will not pin this nonsense entirely on the players. I think we have an above average core that is being completely mismanaged.

 

[Kingster]

Cousins 0.7 assists/ 4 Turnovers
Tyreke 4.2 assists/ 3 Turnovers
Thornton 1.6 assists/ 2 Turnovers

That's all you have to look at. It's abysmal. And Cousins was to be the focal point around which the offense would revolve? I don't think so. I don't care if he had Micky Mouse for a coach, those are ridiculously bad stats for a guy who is supposed to take the place of a pg in your offense.

The small forward issue is secondary to the assist/to issue. What's interesting to me is that not only did the Kings blow it in who they brought in at the 3 position, they blew it because they thought that all you had to do was get a 3 to have a competitive team. That's been the party line. Who thinks that now? They blew it on a a strategic level, not just a tactical level.

 

[Hadlowe]

Cousins 0.7 assists/ 4 Turnovers
Tyreke 4.2 assists/ 3 Turnovers
Thornton 1.6 assists/ 2 Turnovers

About half of Cousins turnovers come from him forcing an issue against good post D and banging the ball off his knee. The other half comes from attempting to pass out of the post doubles, but not having any open teammates because off-ball movement is horrible.

Almost all of Tyreke's turnovers come from him forcing the issue inside. His perimeter passes tend to be pretty good . . . when he makes perimeter passes.

Thornton passes?

And the assist rate is also hurt by the fact that the team, as a whole, cannot hit shots.

For lack of options, I watched the Jazz blow up the Clippers last night. Every offensive set was done with purpose, there were back cuts, back screens, pick and pops leading to clear passes to wide open swingmen. Our starting five (including Hickson) is more talented and athletically gifted than theirs, but each of them buy into the team concept and run plays for the other guy on their team. On paper, the Jazz should be near the bottom of the conference, but they are playing like deep playoff contenders. Heck, their bench could probably beat our starters on a given night.

Meanwhile, we are taking turns pounding the air out of the ball. Coach Smart is right that this team needs to become a family. I can count on one hand the number of players on this team who want to play like a team vs. the ones who are looking to pad their stat line on a losing team.

 

[Larry David]

I only have one problem with that statement. Somehow, people assume that there is a stud SF out there willing to come to Sacramento. Let's be realistic. At this point in time, doing so would in most minds be an open admission that you're willing to bury your career in a mudbog, with only a spider web as a lifeline...

With the glut of veteran small forwards looking for a last pay day this offseason and Sacramento having a mountain of cap space, it was possible to over pay to get a startable vet SF.

And if the Kings really couldn't over pay a veteran small forward this summer to come here, then there really isn't any hope the team will ever get any better. Because SF is an easy position to fill, those guys were looking for a payday, and we had crazy cap space.

And if you aren't prepared to overpay for a vet to come here, then expect more of the same.

Lowest payroll, no defense, bad offense, and no leadership.

The Maloofs murdered this team. When it came time to shed payroll, you need to collect assets. Picks and cheap young players. With only a few exceptions, the Kings made trades to: (1) push as much salary off the books as quickly as possible; and (2) take back as much cash as possible.

When Salmons was playing well in 06, the Kings could have trade him: (1) for a 1st round pick by taking back another shorter MLE sized deal; (2) for a decent prospect and less crap filler.

Instead, the Maloofs were in panic mode when their Wells Fargo stock hit bottom. The Bulls said "We'll take Miller off your hands, but you've got to give us Salmons." The Kings took nothing of value back in that trade.

In fact, later they shipped off Hawes just to get Noc off the books.

And the fans were told, "It's ok were going to be able to use this cap space soon."

Now fans are getting pissed off, and the team is basically saying, "Hey, what do you want from us. We tried to spend some money, but this is a bad team in a market where no good NBA player wants to sign."

 

[Kingster]

About half of Cousins turnovers come from him forcing an issue against good post D and banging the ball off his knee. The other half comes from attempting to pass out of the post doubles, but not having any open teammates because off-ball movement is horrible.

Almost all of Tyreke's turnovers come from him forcing the issue inside. His perimeter passes tend to be pretty good . . . when he makes perimeter passes.

Thornton passes?

And the assist rate is also hurt by the fact that the team, as a whole, cannot hit shots.

For lack of options, I watched the Jazz blow up the Clippers last night. Every offensive set was done with purpose, there were back cuts, back screens, pick and pops leading to clear passes to wide open swingmen. Our starting five (including Hickson) is more talented and athletically gifted than theirs, but each of them buy into the team concept and run plays for the other guy on their team. On paper, the Jazz should be near the bottom of the conference, but they are playing like deep playoff contenders. Heck, their bench could probably beat our starters on a given night.

Meanwhile, we are taking turns pounding the air out of the ball. Coach Smart is right that this team needs to become a family. I can count on one hand the number of players on this team who want to play like a team vs. the ones who are looking to pad their stat line on a losing team.

Yes, they are contrasting styles, aren't they? Another interesting note is that according to Smart there are several players not in the greatest of shape on this team. Isn't it something that this far along in the season and they aren't in the shape necessary to run the ball, and to get back on D to prevent being run against? At least he's taking note of the problem. That's the first step.

 

[Kingster]

So I've normally done one of these every year at some point in the early season. This time I want to look at +/- stats, per 36 min numbers (so that min played is factored out) and team ranks.

Numbers per 36 Thus Far in the Season
Cousins 18.7pts (.430 .000 .779) 13.1reb 0.7ast 1.4stl 2.3blk 4.0TO 6.2FL
Thornto 17.8pts (.411 .349 .872) _ 3.8reb 1.6ast 1.7stl 0.1blk 2.1TO 2.0FL
T.Evans 17.6pts (.424 .214 .747) _ 4.8reb 4.2ast 1.5stl 0.5blk 3.0TO 1.9FL
Thomas 16.3pts (.348 .300 .857) _ 3.7reb 4.3ast 1.7stl 0.4blk 3.3TO 1.2FL
Thomps 13.5pts (.569 .000 .370) _ 7.8reb 1.8ast 0.9stl 0.4blk 1.2TO 3.5FL
GReene 13.0pts (.391 .227 .600) _ 8.0reb 0.6ast 0.6stl 1.1blk 1.4TO 3.6FL
J.Fredet 11.9pts (.345 .283 .923) _ 2.4reb 3.3ast 1.0stl 0.0blk 2.4TO 1.8FL
Hickson 10.2pts (.368 .000 .659) 10.6reb 1.2ast 0.7stl 0.7blk 2.5TO 1.9FL
F.Garcia - 9.5pts (.366 .350 .714) _ 3.9reb 1.6ast 1.4stl 1.2blk 0.7TO 2.5FL
Salmons - 9.4pts (.355 .182 .750) - 4.5reb 2.3ast 1.4stl 0.2blk 1.4TO 3.0FL
TOutlaw _ 8.3pts (.239 .118 .615) - 4.7reb 0.5ast 1.0stl 1.3blk 1.0TO 1.8FL
C.Hayes _ 8.0pts (.419 .000 .750) 11.0reb 2.1ast 0.7stl 0.5blk 1.4TO 4.3FL

-- our 3 main guys ar notable in all shooting above .400 this seson. A feat matched only by 4th starter Hayes and Jason.
-- its perhaps not surprising that peole are calling for Donte and Jason to start next to Reke, Boogie and Thornton, with Thomas as our 6th man. Those have been the 6 most proiductive players on the roster thus far.
-- what ever happedn to Jason the rebouding fool? Thus far this year he's being outrebound by Donte Greene.

FGA/per 36 (an indicator of who's gunning in his minutes)
Cousins 15.4
Thronton 15.4
Evans 14.6
Thomas 13.7
Fredette 12.9
Greene 12.7
Outlaw 12.0
Salmons 10.8
Thomsp 10.5
Outlaw 9.9
Cisco 9.5
Hayes 7.6

-- again perhaps the urge to start Thompson and Cisco can be understood through these numbers. Alongside Hayes, nobody else acts the part of the roleplayer so well. You can see little Zeke guns almost as much as Reke.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offensive/Defensive +/- Stats per 82 Games.com
Offensive per 100 possessions
Greene +10.9
Outlaw +10.6
Cousins +5.0
Hickson +4.2
Thronton +2.7
Thomas +2.6
Evans +2.1
Salmons -0.2
Hayes -5.5
Fredette -8.2
Garcia -9.6
Thomps -11.7

Defensive per 100 possessions (negative = fewer points scored against)
Evans -9.3
Thomps -4.6
Garcia -4.1
Salmons -2.8
Thronton -2.1
Hayes -1.8
Hickson +0.2
Cousins +0.6
Greene +1.6
Fredette +2.0
Thomas +7.7
Outlaw +15.5

OVERALL per 100 possessions
Evans +11.4
Greene +9.3
Thronton +4.7
Cousins +4.4
Hickson +4.0
Salmons +2.6
Hayes -3.7
Outlaw -4.9
Thomas -5.1
Garcia -5.5
Thomps -7.1
Fredette -10.2

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team Ranks
Pts For: 90.1 (25th)
Pts Opp: 101.8 (29th)
Pt Differ: -11.7 (29th)
Team FG% .396 (30th)
Opp FG% .478 (29th)
Team 3pt% .258 (29th)
Team FT% .736 (20th)
Reb Diff: -2.9 (t-26th)
Team TO: 15.9 (t-24th)
Assists: 14.6 (30th)
Steals: 8.2 (t-12th)
Blocks: 4.4 (t-22nd)

May I humbly suggest to Geoff that we were doing better with our big crew by the end of last year than we are with the selfish midgets he went out and replaced them with? According to the stats we are good at virtually nothing. Here's our 1 ray:

Hoopdata.com Shots At Rim
Reke 6.1 (12th in NBA)
Cousins 6.0 (15th in NBA)

Since getting to the rim is how you win inthe NBA and everybody else on those lists with the exception of Javale McGee is a major star. However given that Cousin's FG% in there is an abysmal .487 (worst in the Top 30 at least) maybe its not sucha great thing.

When Jason came into the league he was crashing the boards and crashing the floor. It's almost like he made a conscious decision that to save his body he wouldn't go after some balls that in his rookie year he would.

 

[Section 101]

When Jason came into the league he was crashing the boards and crashing the floor. It's almost like he made a conscious decision that to save his body he wouldn't go after some balls that in his rookie year he would.

More likely to avoid picking up fouls.

 

[Kingsguy881]

More likely to avoid picking up fouls.

This.

 

[bajaden]

This.

There are times when someone else gets the rebound as a result of JT blocking out. Ditto Cousins. Cousins will always get his though because he has great hands.

 

[Kingster]

More likely to avoid picking up fouls.

Point taken. It could be some of both.

 

[Bricklayer]

More likely to avoid picking up fouls.

If that's true it kinda has to stop. Jaosnn as a double double type guy had value int he league. Jason rebounding like Carl Landry is of questionable value. He jsut doesn't have the offensive skills to be sandwiched between Landry and Brandon Bass on the per minute reobunding lists. A major part of the value guys like Jason have is through their ability to do the dirty work the pretty boy scorers can't or won't inbetween their manicure appointments.

 

[SacTownKid]

In terms of individual value Jason rebounding like he is will hurt, but as a team it's not really effecting them all that much. They're still top 10 in the league in RPG, not quite as good with Hayes out of the lineup, but not bad. Differential sucks but it's amazing that they are getting that many boards when you factor in that they are giving the other team so many defensive rebounding opportunities per game due to such a pee poor offensive scheme.

 

[Bricklayer]

In terms of individual value Jason rebounding like he is will hurt, but as a team it's not really effecting them all that much. They're still top 10 in the league in RPG, not quite as good with Hayes out of the lineup, but not bad. Differential sucks but it's amazing that they are getting that many boards when you factor in that they are giving the other team so many defensive rebounding opportunities per game due to such a pee poor offensive scheme.

You do realize the differential is everything right? If I grab 100rebs a game, but my opponent grabs 110, I am still a lousy rebounding team. And we are a losuy rebounding team. With Hayes we might be merely below average. Without him its just another in our long line of woes.

 

[bajaden]

If that's true it kinda has to stop. Jaosnn as a double double type guy had value int he league. Jason rebounding like Carl Landry is of questionable value. He jsut doesn't have the offensive skills to be sandwiched between Landry and Brandon Bass on the per minute reobunding lists. A major part of the value guys like Jason have is through their ability to do the dirty work the pretty boy scorers can't or won't inbetween their manicure appointments.

His per game rebounding averages are a little skewed by the lack of consistency in minutes, but overall, such as in the last game, where in general he played well, his rebounding was below his norm. Taken game by game, some of his games are fine, and in some, he only played a few minutes.

Regular Season FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
Date Opponent Score GS Min M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
Jan 16 @ MIN L 86-99 0 26:15 6 9 66.7 0 0 N/A 0 3 0.0 2 2 4 2 0 0 1 2 12
Jan 14 @ DAL L 60-99 0 17:57 4 8 50.0 0 0 N/A 1 2 50.0 4 4 8 1 1 1 0 5 9
Jan 13 @ HOU L 89-103 0 20:13 3 6 50.0 0 0 N/A 1 2 50.0 2 2 4 1 1 0 0 2 7
Jan 11 @ TOR W 98-91 0 6:31 0 1 0.0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Jan 10 @ PHI L 85-112 0 16:33 6 7 85.7 0 0 N/A 1 5 20.0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 13
Jan 8 ORL L 97-104 0 19:37 4 5 80.0 0 0 N/A 2 2 100. 2 4 6 0 1 0 0 2 10
Jan 5 MIL W 103-100 0 22:31 1 1 100.0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 2
Jan 4 @ DEN L 83-110 0 17:20 0 3 0.0 0 0 N/A 0 1 0.0 2 3 5 0 2 2 0 2 0
Jan 3 @ MEM L 96-113 0 18:40 4 7 57.1 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 2 1 3 0 2 0 0 3 8
Jan 1 NOR W 96-80 0 21:06 2 7 28.6 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 2 3 5 1 0 1 1 1 4
Date Opponent Score GS Min M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
Dec 31 NYK L 92-114 0 24:04 5 10 50 0 0 N/A 3 8 37.5 4 3 7 1 0 0 0 2 13
Dec 29 CHI L 98-108 0 13:23 1 2 50 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 2
Dec 27 @ POR L 79-101 0 14:01 5 6 83.3 0 0 N/A 1 2 50.0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 3 11
Dec 26 LAL W 100-91 0 07:29 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 1 2 50.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 17:30 41 72 56.9 0 0 N/A 10 27 37 21 32 53 12 8 6 3 24 92

Overall, his rebounding is down, regardless of minutes. But the lack of minutes in some games, added to some very bad games makes it look worse than it is. I'll say this. He seems to be a little more aggressive offensively than in the past. Probably a result of having more confidence. Whatever the reason, he's difinitely more efficient. However, it may be taking away some of his aggressiveness in the rebounding area. Just a guess..

Note: Sorry about the mess the stats turned out to be. I've never figured out how to copy and have them stay exactly the same way.

 

[Capt. Factorial]

His per game rebounding averages are a little skewed by the lack of consistency in minutes, but overall, such as in the last game, where in general he played well, his rebounding was below his norm. Taken game by game, some of his games are fine, and in some, he only played a few minutes.

Regular Season FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
Date Oppont Score ..GS Min .M .A .Pct .M A Pct M .A .Pct OR DR Tot A TO S B PF Pts
Jan16@MIN L 86-99.. 0 26:15 6. 9. 66.7 0 0 N/A 0. 3. 0.00 2. 2. 4. 2. 0 0 1 2. 12
Jan14@DAL L 60-99.. 0 17:57 4. 8. 50.0 0 0 N/A 1. 2. 50.0 4. 4. 8. 1. 1 1 0 5. 9.
Jan13@HOU L 89-103. 0 20:13 3. 6. 50.0 0 0 N/A 1. 2. 50.0 2. 2. 4. 1. 1 0 0 2. 7.
Jan11@TOR W 98-91.. 0 06:31 0. 1. 0.00 0 0 N/A 0. 0. N/A. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0 0 0 1. 0.
Jan10@PHI L 85-112. 0 16:33 6. 7. 85.7 0 0 N/A 1. 5. 20.0 0. 4. 4. 1. 0 0 0 0. 13.
Jan 8 ORL L 97-104. 0 19:37 4. 5. 80.0 0 0 N/A 2. 2. 100. 2. 4. 6. 0. 1 0 0 2. 10
Jan 5 MIL W 103-100 0 22:31 1. 1. 100. 0 0 N/A 0. 0. N/A. 0. 2. 2. 2. 1 2 0 1. 2.
Jan4@ DEN L 83-110. 0 17:20 0. 3. 0.00 0 0 N/A 0. 1. 0.00 2. 3. 5. 0. 2 2 0 2. 0.
Jan3@ MEM L 96-113. 0 18:40 4. 7. 57.1 0 0 N/A 0. 0. N/A. 2. 1. 3. 0. 2 0 0 3. 8.
Jan 1 NOR W 96-80.. 0 21:06 2. 7. 28.6 0 0 N/A 0. 0. N/A. 2. 3. 5. 1. 0 1 1 1. 4.
Dec31 NYK L 92-114. 0 24:04 5. 10 50.0 0 0 N/A 3. 8. 37.5 4. 3. 7. 1. 0 0 0 2. 13
Dec29 CHI L 98-108. 0 13:23 1. 2. 50.0 0 0 N/A 0. 0. N/A. 0. 2. 2. 1. 0 0 0 0. 2.
Dec27@POR L 79-101. 0 14:01 5. 6. 83.3 0 0 N/A 1. 2. 50.0 1. 1. 2. 1. 0 0 1 3. 11
Dec26 LAL W 100-91. 0 07:29 0. 0. N/A. 0 0 N/A 1. 2. 50.0 0. 1. 1. 0. 0 0 0 0. 1.
Total.............. 0 17:30 41 72 56.9 0 0 N/A 10 27 37.0 21 32 53 12 8 6 3 24 92

Overall, his rebounding is down, regardless of minutes. But the lack of minutes in some games, added to some very bad games makes it look worse than it is. I'll say this. He seems to be a little more aggressive offensively than in the past. Probably a result of having more confidence. Whatever the reason, he's difinitely more efficient. However, it may be taking away some of his aggressiveness in the rebounding area. Just a guess..

Note: Sorry about the mess the stats turned out to be. I've never figured out how to copy and have them stay exactly the same way.

OK, there you go. That took me way too long. I don't blame you.