SLAB
Hall of Famer
Are we certain that this is a function of Christie as a coach, and not a function of Vivek as an owner who is instructing Christie on how he wants the team to be coached?
It’s the latter. Our guy wasn’t this inept last year.
Are we certain that this is a function of Christie as a coach, and not a function of Vivek as an owner who is instructing Christie on how he wants the team to be coached?
Exactly!It’s the latter. Our guy wasn’t this inept last year.
It’s the latter. Our guy wasn’t this inept last year.
You mean something like Vivek telling Christie, “Don’t play Keon this game til the 4th Q”. I highly doubt itAre we certain that this is a function of Christie as a coach, and not a function of Vivek as an owner who is instructing Christie on how he wants the team to be coached?
Eh. I'm a massive Christie skeptic, and part of the reason is that he was rather inept last year, particularly when it came to his lineups. Consistently ran Monk/LaVine/DeRozan/Murray/Sabonis for big minutes, despite that lineup's obvious defensive deficiencies. Consistently kept Kepn glued to the bench until Monk went down with injury. You'd think a former NBA 2-guard who buttered his bread on the defensive end would grasp Keon's value to a team filled with so many weak and/or disinterested defenders, but it's obvious Christie is more of a fraternity head coach who puts egos first.
I totally disagree with the notion that Christie's ineptness last night was due to Vivek micro-managing him from the sidelines. Lavine played 29 minutes last night. A blind man could see he didn't have it after 5 minutes because of his back. That leaves 24 additional minutes for Ellis. Christie had the easy excuse of injury to sit Lavine. He didn't. If he doesn't have the stones to tell Vivek he can't play the guy because he's injured then get another fricken job. Nobody can tell me that an injured Lavine is more impactful than a healthy Ellis. In addition, the Vivek excuse doesn't wash concerning the manner Christie is using both of his rookies. The "great" point guard Westbrook had seven turnovers for which Christie rewarded him with 35 minutes. Schroeder was awarded with 25 minutes for his two points and 0-10 shooting. There is absolutely no reason Christie can't persuade Vivek (if that's what's really happening) that out of the 60 minutes he gave those two that Clifford shouldn't get another 15 minutes or so at the point guard position. All of it speaks to Christie's weakness as the HC, and it doesn't make Perry look good either.
Westbrook has a minimum veteran salary. His minutes are not remotely correlated to his salary. It's hard for me to believe that Christie has gotten the word from management/ownership that because of his brand Westbrook absolutely must get at least X minutes a game.Is it mostly putting egos first, or managing contracts by basically being obligated to favor who is paid the most by far?
Factoring in the contracts and the vested interest of the organization is quite a challenge for a head coach in this situation. Always makes me wonder how the rotations would go, if there wasn't such a massive gap in pay among many of these players. That was the beauty of collegiate athletics
Like I said, if that's what's going on, it's an easy excuse to play Lavine much much less in this game because of his injured back. If Christie doesn't have the words to justify that to Vivek-Perry, then get another fricken job. Weak, weak, weak.The bottom line is does he have the power to tell the owner that he wants to play the guy that is paid 2.3 million nearly as much as the guy that is paid 47.5 million?
No chance. Follow the money
Westbrook has a minimum veteran salary. His minutes are not remotely correlated to his salary. It's hard for me to believe that Christie has gotten the word from management/ownership that because of his brand Westbrook absolutely must get at least X minutes a game.
You mean something like Vivek telling Christie, “Don’t play Keon this game til the 4th Q”. I highly doubt it
More like Vivek saying “Play the names, who cares about ‘Keon Ellis.’ I don’t, so the fans don’t either!”
He's the coach, isn't he? If you reduce Westbrook's minutes by 10 to 25 minutes is that going to get Christie fired in this game? It's ridiculous. Then you look at Schroeder's minutes in this game and it's ridiculous squared. Then you look at how Clifford was actually used when he was in there and it's a total cluster-F. Totally moronic coaching. There's no excuse whatsoever other than stupidity.Westbrook is a far outlier, because he will be in the hall of fame and he still has some left in the tank.
By the way, Christie is making about the same as Keon Ellis or slightly less. He has little to no power or leverage in his current position
More like Vivek saying “Play the names, who cares about ‘Keon Ellis.’ I don’t, so the fans don’t either!”
Westbrook is a far outlier, because he will be in the hall of fame and he still has some left in the tank.
By the way, Christie is making about the same as Keon Ellis or slightly less. He has little to no power or leverage in his current position
It's still a question of what Vivek wants more, to light the beam on a random Tuesday in November, or to get a ring in June? The ironic thing is players like Carter and Ellis probably actually could help the team win more games now, of course it comes at the cost of basically crunching potential into a surefire role player position at least with Carter.
The mantra is defense supposedly, well DBPM has Carter at the top of the team at 3.2, Keon next at 1.8, then the next is Cardwell at a not even in the vicinity 0.4. You get out what you put in. Don't put in your best defenders? Expect hopelessness. Carter and Ellis should be playing TOGETHER, it's obvious when they do the defense is close to passable on the perimeter. That said, historically vets win in this league, but if being 3-6 is >>> 2-7 in their mind then Christie is doing the job asked.