Kings want Evans (latest news, tweets, etc.)

Interesting, don't see AK being able to bring the ball up any better than McLemore myself. I hope we get to find out though :)
Distributor. My bad. Meant that he would be there to distribute. He's a decent passer. I don't expect him to bring the ball up.
 
Distributor. My bad. Meant that he would be there to distribute. He's a decent passer. I don't expect him to bring the ball up.
So you just want a semi decent distributor to go next to Tyreke, who is a guard or SF? Like Cousins isn't strong enough in that area in comparison to AK? Or simply at the wrong position to be effective in your opinion.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
I was hoping for Iggy, but I like AK to fit that role as well. Seems like Iggy is not coming though, which makes me believe that they are going to let Evans walk and sign a true PG and a shooting SF.
Have you ever wondered what Tyreke would be like if he had played PG the last 4 years? He wouldn't be a little waterbug like IT and certainly not as cute but by now he might have developed a very effective PG game. OK, so we let Tyreke walk and replace him with some unknown PG. Who? Is this new PG going to shoot 48% and have as many assists as Tyreke did in his first year? Will he be young and an elite athlete? Will he take it to the hole with so much authority that defenses have to adjust for him? This is what pisses me off about the use of Tyreke. Defenses had to adjust for him as a PG and after four years he might have learned how to handle that. Now all he knows is how to stand in the corner to be a three point threat. We have screwed Tyreke and if he left because he didn't want to but up with that bull**** anymore, I wouldn't blame him.

Why do you think he came out of the meeting with Vivek, PDA, and Malone in such a good mood? Do you think he is happy because the Kings said they were going to let him go? Why don't we stick with the facts as we know them and not your unshakeable and occasionally illogical thoughts about PG. It is exactly your way of thinking that has held back his development.
 
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 5m
It is possible Tyreke Evans never signs the proposed $44M offer sheet with Pelicans, sources tell Y! Sports. Still a fluid scenario.
Come on Vivek and PDA! Don't drop the ball on this one!

Obviously Tyreke wants to be a King and he is giving them the chance to match the offer, but restructure it so he gets the same money and cap friendlier term for the Kings. If he signs the NO offer sheet, it would make it tougher for the Kings to match.

Please don't Drop the Ball on Tyreke!

I expect (hope) the Kings and Tyreke to come to terms by tonight!
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
So you just want a semi decent distributor to go next to Tyreke, who is a guard or SF? Like Cousins isn't strong enough in that area in comparison to AK? Or simply at the wrong position to be effective in your opinion.
Apparently he has to be a REAL PG and not like a whole bunch of other PGs in the league. It's the only way it can be. No team can win without a REAL PG. That's an NBA if not universal basketball rule.
 
Apparently he has to be a REAL PG and not like a whole bunch of other PGs in the league. It's the only way it can be. No team can win without a REAL PG. That's an NBA if not universal basketball rule.
Well he said he wanted Iggy but AK would work too... so I am not sure if that's the case at the moment. And not for ball handling but to help with distribution, is where I think we are at.
 
Why do you think he came out of the meeting with Vivek, PDA, and Malone in such a good mood? Do you think he is happy because the Kings said they were going to let him go? Why don't we stick with the facts as we know them and not your unshakeable and occasionally illogical thoughts about PG. It is exactly your way of thinking that has held back his development.
Sayyyy whaaaaaa? My way of thinking is what the old GM, and the new GM have talked about. I don't get how you feel you know more than both of them and the coaching staffs who also came out and said they want another ball handler. Maybe they have that way of thinking because it's true?

If you want Reke as a sole ball handler/distributor on on the floor with our "A-team" then so be it. Prepare for craptacular offensive execution.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
Sayyyy whaaaaaa? My way of thinking is what the old GM, and the new GM have talked about. I don't get how you feel you know more than both of them and the coaching staffs who also came out and said they want another ball handler. Maybe they have that way of thinking because it's true?

If you want Reke as a sole ball handler/distributor on on the floor with our "A-team" then so be it. Prepare for craptacular offensive execution.
They also said they were intrigued with McLemore and Tyreke because of their skills. Tell me why Tyreke was happy after the meeting. What's your guess? Do you seriously think he is happy because he was told he would be traded, used as a SF or anything else? Clearly McLemore is to be the SG or we have screwed up yet another draft.

I am just as dismayed by your comments so knock off the hysterics. BTW, I NEVER said I wanted him to be the sole facilitator. Those are your assumptions. I have said this team needs facilitation by committee. I recognize both Tyreke's skills AND his weaknesses. If we don't work around that, we will have lost a valuable asset. Iggy would have been great.
 
Last edited:
Apparently he has to be a REAL PG and not like a whole bunch of other PGs in the league. It's the only way it can be. No team can win without a REAL PG. That's an NBA if not universal basketball rule.
What's the use of having a facilitator who can't facilitate? I never said I wanted a REAL PG. I don't care if he is a combo guard, as long as they can distribute, and make others around him better then it's all good to me.

I felt that Iggy and Reke could have worked because we had two handlers. I DON'T think giving Cousins the ball in the high post will work though because while Cousins is a good passer I don't think he would be consistent enough.
 
Sayyyy whaaaaaa? My way of thinking is what the old GM, and the new GM have talked about. I don't get how you feel you know more than both of them and the coaching staffs who also came out and said they want another ball handler. Maybe they have that way of thinking because it's true?

If you want Reke as a sole ball handler/distributor on on the floor with our "A-team" then so be it. Prepare for craptacular offensive execution.
it should be noted that no PG should be a team's only ball handler and distributor. i don't care if it's steve nash in his prime, there must be some overlap in basic skillsets. and, considering that ben mclemore has a relatively weak handle, and isn't likely to become a top-flight passer as a SG, the kings should be looking for ball handling/passing at any/all other positions. so, whether the kings re-sign evans and move him back to PG, let tyreke walk and sign jose calderon, or pursue another option, it's hardly a bad idea to consider bringing in a SF who can handle the ball and/or effectively distribute, correct? if so, what exactly are you arguing about? i don't think anybody denies that tyreke should be paired with talent that can share in ballhandling/passing responsibilities. in fact, most of us are actively hoping that the kings finally bring in a capable, starting-quality SF to fill in some of those gaps...
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
What's the use of having a facilitator who can't facilitate? I never said I wanted a REAL PG. I don't care if he is a combo guard, as long as they can distribute, and make others around him better then it's all good to me.

I felt that Iggy and Reke could have worked because we had two handlers. I DON'T think giving Cousins the ball in the high post will work though because while Cousins is a good passer I don't think he would be consistent enough.
You don't read my notes, do you?
 
it should be noted that no PG should be a team's only ball handler and distributor. i don't care if it's steve nash in his prime, there must be some overlap in basic skillsets. and, considering that ben mclemore has a relatively weak handle, and isn't likely to become a top-flight passer as a SG, the kings should be looking for ball handling/passing at any/all other positions. so, whether the kings re-sign evans and move him back to PG, let tyreke walk and sign jose calderon, or pursue another option, it's hardly a bad idea to consider bringing in a SF who can handle the ball and/or effectively distribute, correct? if so, what exactly are you arguing about? i don't think anybody denies that tyreke should be paired with talent that can share in ballhandling/passing responsibilities. in fact, most of us are actively hoping that the kings finally bring in a capable, starting-quality SF to fill in some of those gaps...
100% totally agree. Being that Evans is below average at seeing the floor I really wanted to get someone at SF who is above average to at least even it out.
 
100% totally agree. Being that Evans is below average at seeing the floor I really wanted to get someone at SF who is above average to at least even it out.
Do you throw little comments like this to elicit a negative reaction from people? I often see you throw in comments like this that everyone knows will get a poor response but I haven't figured out if it is on purpose or innocently done.
 
Being that Evans is below average at seeing the floor
This is the only part I disagree with you Gary. I believe Evans is at worst average at seeing the floor but it's how he chooses to use that vision that may bother people. Westbrook syndrome.
 
This is the only part I disagree with you Gary. I believe Evans is at worst average at seeing the floor but it's how he chooses to use that vision that may bother people. Westbrook syndrome.
I don't think anyone can say he is below average at seeing the floor without adding a bunch of stipulations to it as I am sure Gary will do shortly.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
100% totally agree. Being that Evans is below average at seeing the floor I really wanted to get someone at SF who is above average to at least even it out.



Just because you keep saying he has below average vision doesn't make it true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just because you keep saying he has below average vision doesn't make it true.
I fully expect him to update his evaluation to "below average court vision for a starting point guard who is being paid 12 million dollars a year, while not being the primary option on the team, who has been in the league for multiple years in addition to being a poor shooter, that needs to rely on kicking the ball out to be effective".
 
Do you throw little comments like this to elicit a negative reaction from people? I often see you throw in comments like this that everyone knows will get a poor response but I haven't figured out if it is on purpose or innocently done.
What would you have wanted me to say? Do you feel that Evans is above average at seeing the floor? I am not doing it on purpose BTW.
 
Just because you keep saying he has below average vision doesn't make it true.
A couple clips is not evidence. Hell, I could edit the video and put myself in there in the place of Evans and say that's me doing all the work.

And maybe we will be able to see if the team keeps him, and puts him at PG. If I am wrong I would be the first to admit it. No excuses.
 
Could be interesting to look at Turner. You wonder how much confidence he has left in his game after Collins seemed to do all he could to stamp it out, but his offensive numbers from a support player's perspective weren't bad:

Season 2012-13
Age 24
Pos SF
G 82
GS 82
MP 35.3
FG 5.4
FGA 12.8
FG% 0.419
3P 0.7
3PA 1.9
3P% 0.365
FT 1.9
FTA 2.5
FT% 0.74
ORB 0.7
DRB 5.6
TRB 6.3
AST 4.3
STL 0.9
BLK 0.2
TOV 2.3
PF 2.4
PTS 13.3


The question is if he can guard the position competently. His defensive rating wasn't bad last season. He could be had for a decent price given the rebuild in Philly right now.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
And maybe we will be able to see if the team keeps him, and puts him at PG. If I am wrong I would be the first to admit it. No excuses.
Im with you. I don't believe in Reke at $12 mil at PG. But hey, this is something I'd love to be wrong about as it would mean the team would be winning again.

However, I wonder if the other side would be willing to admit the same if Reke doesn't work at PG?
 
What would you have wanted me to say? Do you feel that Evans is above average at seeing the floor? I am not doing it on purpose BTW.
You could have agreed without throwing a jab at Evans that any unbiased, or biased person couldn't honestly think is true. Comments like that tend to be made by people trolling which is why I asked if you were doing it on purpose so I would know to just ignore the comments in the future.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
And maybe we will be able to see if the team keeps him, and puts him at PG. If I am wrong I would be the first to admit it. No excuses.
If you were to say he's not a great decision maker and that needs improvement, I'd completely agree. But vision is different. He's repeatedly shown he has it. It's more a question of making the right decisions. Poor vision implies he has no hope or ability to make these passes in the first place. When Jwill threw behind the back passes into the second row, it wasn't due to a lack of vision, it was decision making.

And some of his decision making is on him, some is on his role frequently changing. He has shown improvement in his decision making, but I think we'd both agree it'll have to continue improving if we're to become a playoff team with him running the point. But I also wouldn't sit here and say that's unlikely to happen. Even Nash/Stockton took years to learn the position at this level. All PG's go through their lumps in the NBA aside from a select few.
 
You could have agreed without throwing a jab at Evans that any unbiased, or biased person couldn't honestly think is true. Comments like that tend to be made by people trolling which is why I asked if you were doing it on purpose so I would know to just ignore the comments in the future.
Fair enough. I will try to curtail my negativity.