You are basing your beliefs off of sheep mentality - "I hear other people say it so I'll say it to, then I will sound educated on the matter." Jimmer is not an all-star defender. But he has not been a liability on the floor. He's had a few "wtf" moments (just like every other player on the team) - however, many of those came when Coach W set him up to fail with awful matchups against guys 5 inches taller than him.
He also has more to his offense than just 3-point shooting, which - if you've watched the games - you have already seen. He's shown an ability to get to the hoop. run the offense, and distribute the ball. His fg% has been poor... good job on figuring that one out. But, like Evans, you apparently think "OMG SCORE LOTS UV POINTZ!!!" is all there is to the game of basketball... when it's not.
Hahahahaha. Some golden material in there. nice!
So you are suggesting that I base my opinion on Jimmers defense by how he defends players who can't score. Ok, perfect. What a fierce defender he is! Guess what, you defend who you defend. No qualifiers. He is simply not good on defense. Thomas is better with 4 less inches of height. As far as being a liability, its all relative. He is the biggest liability on defense out of the players who get frequent minutes. He is always the best matchup to attack for the other team.
And I guess you don't understand or didn't care to understand what I even said. Isaiah has been better in his low amount of minutes. Will he be as good with more minutes? I have no idea, but he has played well (and is playing really well right now, go me!).
I like Jimmer, but I have seen AT LEAST as many flaws in his game as I have strengths so far this season.
His shooting has been poor, his defense has been poor, his court vision has been fine to good, his ball handling has been average at best, his decision making off the dribble has left much to be desired.
And again, same might be able to be said about Thomas, but I don't know. He hasn't had enough chances to make mistakes.