NOOOOOOO!!! Kings renounce rights to Dalembert!!

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#31
I must of missed that HOF center everyone says we had last season, Dally did good some times, but he wasn't right out dominate like the best shot blockers in the league are. For every good play he made, he would miss a box out or a rotation the next few series. If he was really a dominate player on the defensive end, our defense would show for it. It was nice having a tall 7 foot guy that would try to block some shots but I dont think Dally is worth what he thinks he is. Whiteside can easily replace that production if given the minutes.
This is heresy, of course. There were times where I was very disappointed with Daly. Just the same ............ no rookie can step in and be just as productive. Now, if Hassan IS as productive, we will have hit the motherload. Maybe we are OK as we stand but I am very conflicted about this and would love to see Hassan in a pick up game.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#33
When I heard that they were signing Thornton and Hayes, my first thought was, have they renounced Dalembert. Because there was no way they could sign both with that 20 million dollar cap hold. The only way was if Dalembert agreed to a contract, and signed first. I'm not going to criticize untill I know if anything was offered to Dalembert, and how much. But if they made a decent offer and he didn't jump on it, then they had no choice if they want to start camp tomorrow with all the players there.

If Dalembert is being cute and playing a waiting game, then he or his agent is just plain stupid. There just isn't enough time right now to do that. The Kings are in a position where they needed an answer from him today. If not, they had to renounce him, or they couldn't make any of the other moves they needed to make.
 
#34
I really don't know what to think. Is this a negotiating strategy? Were the Kings and Daly in talks, but Daly isn't ready to commit, so they had to do this because of the cap hold? Was Daly ever interested in resigning? Is another move in the works, to bring in an actual center, or a more likely replacement for Daly?

So many possibilities, so few answers.
This are the same questions we keep asking ourselves every time our front office makes a move that doesn't make much sense. I can just about bet my life on the fact that there won't be any other news worthy moves. We will sign our rookies, go into camp with out super recruit in Hayes and call it a day. We only need to spend 80% of the cam this year so we will try and hit that minimum (I think with Thornton, Hayes and the rookies we might be already there) and people will keep wondering what Petrie has up his sleeve.

When the season finished it was clear that we weren't keen to keep Dalembert. The talk from our broke owners was all about keeping Thornton and Dally was barely mentioned. Then we trade for Hickson and sign Hayes. Its a clear indication that we do not value players like Dally and were never keen to spend to keep him. If we could low ball him and he accepts then that's cool. But it was always a case we wouldn't mind having him back but on our own terms which are well below the market. Even our owners came out and just confirmed how basketball stupid they are after Dallas won the championship. According to our Vegas boys, Dallas won because they could shoot and they came away from those series with the belief that shooting is the most important trait in the NBA champs when even the casual basketball fan would tell you Chandler was the difference on that team. Dallas could always shoot for a better part of 15 years but once they got an elite interior defensive force to anchor their defence, they were always the bride maids.

Mark my words. This is it for us. Hit the minimum try and sell the excitement. Promise to spend big next year and never do and keep paddling bull**** to loyal fan base.
 
#35
You guys that think Whiteside can just come in and be Sammy D on defense are insane. Dalembert is a league veteran and Whiteside could barely hold his own in the D-League. What makes you think he can just come in and be like Dalembert without the offense? Just because he's tall and can block some shots doesn't mean he can play D.
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
#36
For all the 49er fans out there, this situation increasingly reminds me of the Dashawn Goldson situation last offseason. Take that for what it's worth
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
#37
Could see it coming. Replace the 6'11" longarmed shotblocker with the 6'6" groundbound guy. SMH.

This will also once again provide me the opportunity to mention Petrie's HORRIBLE record when it comes to acquiring or retaining shotblockers. he just doesn't get it. Never spends resources to get top ones. Never spends resources to retain the few he gets. Daly? 1yr. Justin Williams? 1 yr. Skinner, if he counts? 1yr. Tag 1yr. Keon Clark 1yr. Yogi Stewart? 1yr. He can't see it. Its a major hole in the ole genius. There are teams that over the same period of time have almost never been without one or more. Makes no sense that a man credited with being such a great talent evaluator, such a sneaky trader, should over 15 years never be able to acquire a single player of a certain sort that sticks. No sense that is unless he just does not value that sort of player and sits at home every June wathcing other teams play for the rings and wondering what the heck Cuban is thinking having not 1 but 2 of those worthless tall longarmed guys out there when they can't even shoot a three.
Maybe Hassan has been beasting in practice? Oh wait...


For real though, I think this is less about Petrie and more about Dally wanting to get out. The writing was on the wall since midseason last year. I dont think he was ever even considering staying. As far as our new 6'6 groundbound midget...At least he plays D. Thats something.

Not that I'm not as annoyed as you are with our constant lack of shotblockers over the years. I love shotblockers too! Lets just hope Whiteside puts it together and actually sticks around.
 
#38
I kinda find it funny that non of the teams fans that Bert mentioned want him on their teams. He would of been signed by now if he was getting MLE money, my guess he signs for a 1-2 year deal , no one is biting on him even after the Kings renouced his rights. In that case I would say he priced himself into Heats price range.
 
#39
Wait, even though we don't have Dalembert's Bird Rights... we still have cap space and could sign and trade him to a team thats OVER the cap, right?

Maybe to Miami... for Bosh? Certainly a big name... what else would we have to add? ;)
 
#40
Wait, even though we don't have Dalembert's Bird Rights... we still have cap space and could sign and trade him to a team thats OVER the cap, right?

Maybe to Miami... for Bosh? Certainly a big name... what else would we have to add? ;)
yes we can sign and trade him, but the max deal he can get now is 4 years.
 

iowamcnabb

Hall of Famer
#41
yes we can sign and trade him, but the max deal he can get now is 4 years.
According to James Ham, " The Kings no longer have Larry Bird rights to any of the four waived players. All four could be retained as unrestricted free agents, but the maximum length of any deal signed would be four years, instead of five. The Kings also relinquished the right to use any of these players in sign and trade transactions."
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#42
This are the same questions we keep asking ourselves every time our front office makes a move that doesn't make much sense. I can just about bet my life on the fact that there won't be any other news worthy moves. We will sign our rookies, go into camp with out super recruit in Hayes and call it a day. We only need to spend 80% of the cam this year so we will try and hit that minimum (I think with Thornton, Hayes and the rookies we might be already there) and people will keep wondering what Petrie has up his sleeve.

When the season finished it was clear that we weren't keen to keep Dalembert. The talk from our broke owners was all about keeping Thornton and Dally was barely mentioned. Then we trade for Hickson and sign Hayes. Its a clear indication that we do not value players like Dally and were never keen to spend to keep him. If we could low ball him and he accepts then that's cool. But it was always a case we wouldn't mind having him back but on our own terms which are well below the market. Even our owners came out and just confirmed how basketball stupid they are after Dallas won the championship. According to our Vegas boys, Dallas won because they could shoot and they came away from those series with the belief that shooting is the most important trait in the NBA champs when even the casual basketball fan would tell you Chandler was the difference on that team. Dallas could always shoot for a better part of 15 years but once they got an elite interior defensive force to anchor their defence, they were always the bride maids.

Mark my words. This is it for us. Hit the minimum try and sell the excitement. Promise to spend big next year and never do and keep paddling bull**** to loyal fan base.
If you lived in the states, you'd have access to Grants show. 50/50 chance there's a "fairly big name" coming in as soon as tomorrow. Not a guard. Said Hayes was a bench player. That's what we know. SF or big. In talks with that player.
 
#43
According to James Ham, " The Kings no longer have Larry Bird rights to any of the four waived players. All four could be retained as unrestricted free agents, but the maximum length of any deal signed would be four years, instead of five. The Kings also relinquished the right to use any of these players in sign and trade transactions."
For those that don't know Larry Coon has his own website now. wwwcbafaq.com

34. What does renouncing a player mean?
As detailed in question number 31, free agents continue to be included in team salary. By renouncing a player, a team gives up its right to use the Larry Bird, Early Bird, or Non-Bird exceptions (see question number 19) to re-sign that player. A renounced player no longer counts toward team salary, so teams use renouncement to gain additional cap room. After renouncing a player, the team is still permitted to re-sign that player, but must either have enough cap room to fit the salary, or sign the player using the Minimum Salary exception. The exception to this is an Early Bird free agent who is coming off the second season of his rookie scale contract. Such players, when renounced, are treated as Non-Bird free agents.

If the player does not sign with any team (his prior team or any other team) for the entire season, then his renouncement continues. In other words, the team is not permitted to renounce a player, let him lie idle for the year, then re-sign him the following summer using Bird rights. However, if the player re-signs with his prior team, then his renouncement is no longer in effect when his contract ends. For example, if a team renounces their Larry Bird rights to a player, then re-signs that player to a one-year contract using cap room, then the player is once again a Larry Bird free agent the following summer.

After renouncing a player, a team can still trade the player in a sign-and-trade agreement (see question number 79).
Unless they changed the rule in the new cba, they still can sign and trade him.
 

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#45
Yeah, Daly can't be signed and traded anymore. It's the same rule that keeps teams under the cap from signing other teams players and trading them. That would completely skew values even more than they are if it were possible.
 

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#46
For those that don't know Larry Coon has his own website now. wwwcbafaq.com



Unless they changed the rule in the new cba, they still can sign and trade him.
I didn't know you could do that, and I don't think that's right. Once you no longer have Bird rights to a player they are technically another free agent I thought.
 
#47
If you lived in the states, you'd have access to Grants show. 50/50 chance there's a "fairly big name" coming in as soon as tomorrow. Not a guard. Said Hayes was a bench player. That's what we know. SF or big. In talks with that player.
Thanks for the tip off mate!

However, I am always reluctant to believe anything that Grant tries to paddle. He is he Maloof mouthpiece. Every year we hear the same thing but nothing comes of it. Its always a tactic to keep the fan interested and hoping that something (a follow up move) is around the corner yet it never comes.

I would be very surprised if we get a big name front court player to replace Dalembert. Like I have said many times before, There are better FAs out there than Dalembert but there are not many big man that can fit with Cousins both defensively and offensively in terms of covering his weaknesses. Dalembert is a great fit where as someone like Nene would be horrendous despite arguably being a better overall player. Similarly with Gasol...might be more talented than Dally but pair him with Cousins and who guards the PF?!

Like I said, I am not holding my breath. I would be very surprised if anything really significant happened.
 
#48
For those that don't know Larry Coon has his own website now. wwwcbafaq.com

Unless they changed the rule in the new cba, they still can sign and trade him.
Provided that the team is under the cap enough to absorb the contract? Right?

It doesn't make sense. The whole point of the Bird rights is that the team can go over the cap to sign their own free agents. Once you renounce the rights to a player, he is just like any other FA and you have to work within the salary cap room.
 
#50
Provided that the team is under the cap enough to absorb the contract? Right?

It doesn't make sense. The whole point of the Bird rights is that the team can go over the cap to sign their own free agents. Once you renounce the rights to a player, he is just like any other FA and you have to work within the salary cap room.
Yes they still need the cap space to sign them.

79. Can a free agent be signed and immediately traded?
Under no circumstances can a team sign and then trade another team's free agent. But there is a rule that allows teams to re-sign their own free agents for trading purposes, called the sign-and-trade rule. Under the sign-and-trade rule, the player is re-signed and immediately traded to another team. This is done by adding a clause to the contract which stipulates that the contract is invalid if the player's rights are not traded to the specific team within 48 hours.

A sign-and-trade deal can be made even with players who have been renounced, but cannot be made when the player is signed using the Mid-Level, Bi-Annual or Disabled Player exceptions. Sign-and-trade contracts must be for three years or longer, but only the first season of the contract must be guaranteed. The three year minimum (even though the last two seasons may be non-guaranteed) ensures that the new team will not acquire Bird rights to the player any sooner than if they had signed him directly, because they would have to waive him, after which they wouldn't be able to use Bird rights (see question number 26).

One complication with sign-and-trade deals is that the signed player can immediately become a BYC player (see question number 76 for more information on BYC), so the player's BYC value must be used when determining whether the trade is allowed.

If a sign-and-trade contract contains a signing bonus, then either team can pay it. By default the team that signs the player pays the signing bonus (as with any other contract), but since a sign-and-trade is in essence a contract with the receiving team, the teams can agree that the receiving team will pay it. However, any portion that is paid by the signing team counts toward the $3 million limit for cash included in a trade (which in effect limits the portion of a signing bonus that can be paid by the signing team to $3 million).

If a sign-and-trade contract contains a trade bonus, then the bonus is not earned upon the trade that accompanies the signing, but rather on the first subsequent trade.

See question number 83 for more information on how long a team must wait after signing a contract before they can trade a player.
 
#51
I didn't know you could do that, and I don't think that's right. Once you no longer have Bird rights to a player they are technically another free agent I thought.
Bird rights give a few things, can go over the cap, can be 5 years and have bigger raises. By renouncing the rights he just became a normal free agent, just like if they signed a player to a 2 year deal they can sign and trade that player when the contract expires.
 
Last edited:
#52
Perhaps it might be better to wait and see what Petrie comes up with before we scorch his name!! Bricklayer: the names you mentioned above (and someone already called you on them) couldn't even make our team today, even in their best times. There are still some GOOD choices out there in Free Agency (including Sammy) and Trades, so we can still hope Petrie lands one. Let's send our letters in to Santa and maybe he'll get us our wishes. GO KINGS !!!
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#53
Perhaps it might be better to wait and see what Petrie comes up with before we scorch his name!! Bricklayer: the names you mentioned above (and someone already called you on them) couldn't even make our team today, even in their best times. There are still some GOOD choices out there in Free Agency (including Sammy) and Trades, so we can still hope Petrie lands one. Let's send our letters in to Santa and maybe he'll get us our wishes. GO KINGS !!!
As the person who called me on them admitted was true, half the problem is exactly that the names I mentioned couldn't make the team now. Geoff Petrie has NEVER shown any convincing evidence that he values that style of player properly. hence he never goes through any effort to get a good one. Hence we are left with scraps who often do not even get the limited minutes they should. And then they are inevitably gone within a year.

Net result? A team which hasn't finished in the top half of the league in Defensive Field Goal % in the past 8 years. In that time we've only finished in the Top 20 once.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#56
Double sign and trade with Barea?
I can't be sure about the new CBA, but pretty sure that wasn't allowed under the old one given that the Mavs are over the cap.

Not sure waht we would want/get. Barea and Peja are free agents, and hence I think not possible to send back. Beaubois = their future unless they get Deron so hard to beleive they would move him. And after that there's really not much of anything. They want to send us the Traded Player Exception they are getting for S&Ting Chandler to the Knicks, but that alone isn't of much value to us because there is no way we will use it. Maybe a pick or something I suppose

Only other thing I could even come up wiht would be them trying ton dump Haywood and his reamining years on us via the S&T, thus clearing cap room for them and givng us a veteran shotblocker. But that would so overcrowd our forntcourt, and the Mavs have been committed to havin not one bybut two shotblockers in there for most of the decade, so its also very hard to see.
 
Last edited:
#58
I can't be sure about the new CBA, but pretty sure that wasn't allowed under the old one given that the Mavs are over the cap.

Not sure waht we would want/get. Barea and Peja are free agents, and hence I think not possible to send back. Beaubois = their future unless they get Deron so hard to beleive they would move him. And after that there's really not much of anything. They want to send us the Traded Player Exception they are getting for S&Ting Chandler to the Knicks, but that alone isn't of much value to us because there is no way we will use it. Maybe a pick or something I suppose

Only other thing I could even come up wiht would be them trying ton dump Haywood and his reamining years on us via the S&T, thus clearing cap room for them and givng us a veteran shotblocker. But that would so overcrowd our forntcourt, and the Mavs have been committed to havin not one bybut two shotblockers in there for most of the decade, so its also very hard to see.
Double sign and trades were allowed.
 
#59
God, JJ does nothing for this team. They have enough offensive firepower in the backcourt, and have their hands full getting Jimmer adjusted. Why take on another backcourt player? If you are going to go after a guard, go after Ricky BB. He and Evans in the backcourt would be nasty.
 
#60
If we get a first round pick out of this...when we would have lost Dalembert anyways, I'll take it.

Also the chance we add JT into the deal, we can afford to trade a big ... maybe get back Marion? kinda fits that AK role.

I love Beaubois ... Not sure where he will get PT on this team though.