NEWS: Kings trade Casspi + first rounder for JJ Hickson

K

Kingsguy881

Guest
#61
Since this appears to be official (Kings press release on NBA.com) shouldn't this move to the main page?

I am not very familiar with Hickson, is he a legit PF or did we just trade Casspi and a pick for another undersized big?
6'9" with crazy athleticism and long arms.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#62
Yeah. I hear you. I highly (hofefully) doubt it. It would make the org look REAL bad at a bad time to look bad if they did not spend their capspace this summer, or post new CBA. If we make a push to sign Dally, and are able to secure Kirilenko, and use Salmons in spot minutes at the 2 and 3 and for defensive assignments... this is a very, very talented team 1-10. All of that would do wonders for the momentum that has built around here. I also think it might be interesting to speculate that while we still say "maloofs this, maloofs that"... that it really could be another force that will push for things like spending the capspace. Lord knows the maloofs blew all their leverage this spring. Don't spend the capspace, and you look real suspicious of sabotoging the season and pinching pennies for a move down south, that could plausably be denied, after all that's happened.

There, you go! Send your ambition over to the Kings front office please! :)

C - Dalembert
C - Cousins
PF - Hickson
PF - Thompson
SF - Kirilenko
SF - Salmons
SG - Thornton
SG - Garcia
PG - Evans
PG - Fredette
Cheerleaders: Greene, Whiteside

add in 1 veteran backup point, and you are as talented (not good mind you) but as talented as any team in the NBA. Alas, you just don't see teams stack themselves up that deep very often. Players don't like it because they get squeezed for minutes, and you have to pay guys too much to be bit players. Especially with a hard cap looming, you would have to break the team up in a couple of years just to get under the cap.
 
#63
If they don't make the playoffs, they get to keep their lottery pick and the protection then slides to the next year, and the same scenerio would play out. What I read on RealGM was that it could possibly be unprotected by 2014-2015.
From what I read its lotto protected next year, top 10 year after then top 5 then first overall pick.

Giving the pick up next year means we are a playoff team. I dont care about the pick at that point because another young guy doesnt make us better.
 
#65
Young athletic big! Great pick-up! I remembered Hickson at one time was a regular at NBA Top 10 highlights two seasons ago when Lebron was still with the Cavs. I often mistook him as Lebron, as he was dunking a lot of times. He lost his minutes during the playoffs and was out of the rotation after that. I didn't see him much this season but guy has big potential. I also remember Lebron criticizing Brown for not playing Hickson enough during the playoffs as they went with Shaq most of the time.
 
#67
Per Marc Stein:

If first-round pick is not conveyed from SAC to CLE by 2017, then Kings convey their 2017 second-rounder to Cavaliers (protected 56-60)

Protection specifics on Kings to Cavs picks: Protected 1-to-14 in 2012, 1-to-13 in 13, 1-to-12 in 14, 1-to-10 from 15-17
You beat me to it. I think this makes it a very good deal for the Kings.
 
#69
All the MORE reason to sign Dally - a guy who defends and doesn't need a lot of shots in the rotation. I don't see how we could add a Gasol or Nene to Cousins/Hickson/JT without really squashing someone's game.
 
#70
I think this is a nice deal. But there are still some big concerns that others have already pointed out. While the highlight reel blocks are nice, the concern is that he is a very poor defender on pick and rolls and perimeter skilled PFs exploit him. In other words on defense he has many of the same flaws as DMC.
 
#72
If the Kings get out of the lottery next year this trade will be an unquestionable success in the sense that they made the playoffs.
Making the playoffs doesn't mean this trade worked out for us. Maybe Hickson is a significant part of any success we might have, in which case that's a great thing, but we could make the playoffs with Hickson riding the bench. Not likely, but still... I'm just saying, if we're a low seed team and we don't have a first rounder to use or trade in 2012, we might change the grade of this deal. Was just pointing out that this isn't just Hickson > Casspi, therefore we win this trade. There's also a first rounder involved.
 
#73
There, you go! Send your ambition over to the Kings front office please! :)

C - Dalembert
C - Cousins
PF - Hickson
PF - Thompson
SF - Kirilenko
SF - Salmons
SG - Thornton
SG - Garcia
PG - Evans
PG - Fredette
Cheerleaders: Greene, Whiteside

add in 1 veteran backup point, and you are as talented (not good mind you) but as talented as any team in the NBA. Alas, you just don't see teams stack themselves up that deep very often. Players don't like it because they get squeezed for minutes, and you have to pay guys too much to be bit players. Especially with a hard cap looming, you would have to break the team up in a couple of years just to get under the cap.
Pull out AK and Garcia's minutes and that is still an incredibly talented 8 man rotation which is a healthy size and fairly realistic too.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#75
This takes the pressure off the Daly drama. JJ is not a great substitute for what Daly brings us but perhaps the FO thinks Daly's replacement eventually will be Whiteside. Just the same, Cleveland papers say JJ is a defensive player who can rebound. Perhap the reason for the vibes about Daly not being resigned had a lot to do with the faith in Whiteside and the knowledge of this trade. Seems reasonable.

As to Whiteside, I have posted this before but I think we may have gotten a bargain. IF his torn tendon slowed him down at the end of his college career or IF scouts got wind of some knee pain, teams may have dropped a first rounder to a second rounder. Let us remember that WHiteside's injury is curable unlike the dreaded injury that requires microfracture surgery. I can explain it better if some one wishes.

Under normal circumstances, a defensive specialist will not go high in the draft so perhaps we stole at the minimum a 20th pick. Someone siad Whiteside was projected as a #10 pick.

I would not sign another big. At the worst we can get by with JT/JJ/Cuz and at the best we can add Whiteside for spot minutes which I think is ideal. Daly would squelch the development of Whiteside. They are very similar.

So far we have traded 2 bench players for starters. That's a good week. The 1st round pick we gave up in this trade was next to useless as the last thing we need is more average young talent to clog the works.

Let me remind anyone reading this that a while back I was very critical of Hassan (until I learned of his injury) and I am an ardent Daly fan. No one is irreplaceable this side of Jordan, Kareem, and a few still playing. Our only irreplaceable players are NOT going to be replaced so I'm not sure how we could do worse than what we have done. This is bit of an exaggeration but this is a great trade.

We trade a good player in Casspi that had no role on this team and a pick that might be iseless to us and get a young big.
 
#76
What a great pickup!

Hickson is a much better player than Casspi and this deal is a no-brainer even with next years lottery protected draft pick included. The spreadsheet below shows that a first round pick outside of the top ten only has an 18% chance of being a starter and has a 49% chance of being a non-impact player. Hickson is either a starter or else one of the top 3rd bigs in the league. Casspi was buried on the depth chart, and we were just able to capitalize on Cleveland's strange infatuation with Tristan Thompson (Tristan Thompson does not have the skills to start over there, it is going to be a rough year again for Cleveland). If we can hold onto Dalembert we have a deep and talented team with a good mix of youth and veterans.

 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#78
Love this trade. Now that's what I'm talkin 'bout! It's not like we're losing huge cap space because of this deal. We get Hickson AND can still either retain Dally or get somebody else. On talent alone: Hickson > Casspi.

Also, everybody is talking about how everybody is going to work with everybody else on this trade and others, but there is no rule that Thompson can't be traded or Salmons can't be traded for that matter. It's wait and see....
Yeah there is. Salmons can't be traded until Dec, and that gets pushed back if there is a lockout.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#79
He's got another year + qualifying offer left on his deal. Not really a factor.
Well who knows how free agency will work in the next CBA, however I do agree just because I think it is going to be highly unlikely that whatever the outcome is that it would be unfriendly to teams trying to retain their players. But it is another guy demanding to get paid in front of Tyreke and Cousins and if there is a hard cap that is a bit troubling.
 
#81
Great deal by GP!

Casspi has heart and hustle still its no suprise he was dealt, GP moslt likely drafted him for potential trade bait anyways.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#83
Why do you doubt that they are going to try to resign Dalembert? What bearing does us trying to keep him have on any of the moves we've made so far? Free agency hasn't started yet (and probably won't for some time). We can't do anything about Dally right now, nor can we do anything about any other free agents at this point. Whether we resign Dally or not, I don't see how this move or the Maloofs' comments about making Thornton a priority have anything to do with whether we try to keep Dalembert or not.
I think thiis takes the pressure off the resigning of Daly as we now have three bigs. IF we don't go after Daly, it means we have faith in the development of Hassan. Daly would squelch the development of Hassan. Daly is the best person to sign for immediate results and I REALLY like Daly but sticking with what we have and giving Hassan the 4th big's minutes is an investment in the future.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#85
Why did the Cavs want to trade him? Just seems weird to trade a young, athletic big who started tearing it up the last part of the season.
They have Jamison and just drafted Tristan Thompson. Obviously they're looking at Thompson as their future PF and want to get him minutes. They need help at the SF position. Works for both teams..
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#86
From Amick:
The move is even more necessary in light of the likely departure of center Samuel Dalembert, as sources close to him say he was disappointed when extension talks went nowhere with the Kings and he is now far more interested signing with a contender in free agency
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#87
If they don't make the playoffs, they get to keep their lottery pick and the protection then slides to the next year, and the same scenerio would play out. What I read on RealGM was that it could possibly be unprotected by 2014-2015.
True, but the next year its only top 10 protected, and the following year, it declines again.
 
#89
I just read it yesterday, somewhere. YOu can't aquire a player in a trade, and immediately turn around and trade him. I think it was Amick actually, and without a lockout, the soonest Salmons could get dealt is Dec.
Pretty sure you can actually. Rasheed Wallace was traded midseason, played 1 game for Atlanta, then was traded to Detroit
 
L

LWP777

Guest
#90
From Amick:
The move is even more necessary in light of the likely departure of center Samuel Dalembert, as sources close to him say he was disappointed when extension talks went nowhere with the Kings and he is now far more interested signing with a contender in free agency
:(
:(
:(