I don't get Aries obsession with Rubio, specially since a month ago. I don't think Rubio will be better than Evans, as far as I've seen both probably more than anyone here. But that doesn't mean Rubio won't be a very good player. I think Rubio is better than Jennings, and will be a very, very solid starting PG in NBA. Rubio is a pure PG, is a completely different player than Tyreke, he probably won't score as much as Evans, but he'll make a lot more assists. But he won't be as good as Tyreke, because Evans is a beast, right now it seems he will be a perennal All-Star and a league top 5 in a few years.
But just a few things:
1. Compare NBA with FIBA statistics has no sense at all, not because that "higher competition" thing that people usually repeats, but because the game is so different. FIBA basketball has no 3sec rule in D, it's muuuch harder to score because overall team D is much more effective, so compare PPG numbers has no sense. Assists in FIBA only counts if is pass-to-shot or pass-to-dunk, if the player who receives the ball dribbles, there's no assist, so comparing APG numbers doesn't have sense neither. If you see Jennings stats in his italian team, he also sucks. A lot more than Rubio.
2. Rubio isn't playing in NBA because he had a very expensive buyout that Minnesota couldn't pay, not because he didn't want to.
That said, I still don't see the point in NBA starsystem and seeing numbers isolated as far as this is a sport team, even they're incredible stats, they show nothing. Jordan didn't win anything until Pippen arrived, Kobe hasn't win anything without Shaq or Gasol, and other incredible players like LeBron, Wade or Brandon Roy hadn't win anything never.
I don't like people tending to play for his stats, or team offense schemes for highlight the franchise player. They're dangerous: If Evans ends up being only as good as Brandon Roy, Kings won't win anything.