I hope this doesn't cause an attack. I'm sincerely unsure of the answers. But....
Out of curiosity, when they found .8 to be the unacceptable level of intoxication for driving was this the number that proved one could not drive at 100% or let's call it an A level? For example on a training course would drivers flunk at this level? Or would they simply show signs of being impaired? That is to say does .8 mean your vulnerable to poor driving, or incapable of operating it perfectly. For instance which would be worse making several cell calls or driving at .8?
I'm curious also if the numbers over 1.0 are severely more dangerous? That is do more accidents occur with drunk drivers falling in a certain range. Or more precisely what is the average Level for drunk drivers who cause fatalities?
Out of curiosity, when they found .8 to be the unacceptable level of intoxication for driving was this the number that proved one could not drive at 100% or let's call it an A level? For example on a training course would drivers flunk at this level? Or would they simply show signs of being impaired? That is to say does .8 mean your vulnerable to poor driving, or incapable of operating it perfectly. For instance which would be worse making several cell calls or driving at .8?
I'm curious also if the numbers over 1.0 are severely more dangerous? That is do more accidents occur with drunk drivers falling in a certain range. Or more precisely what is the average Level for drunk drivers who cause fatalities?
Actually, the more determining factor of BAC is your kidneys and metabolism. Some smaller, "lighter" people can metabolize far more alcohol than someone that is far larger. Another factor is the amount you normally intake. Your body is a machine that learns how to best process something it's used to. A heavy drinker will not have the same BAC after 5 drinks as an Amish kid who has never drank after the same number of drinks.
Further, it's skewed because .08 BAC effects each individual differently. Remember, alcohol is a narcotic and thusly has differing affects on each person based on their genetic predisposition to alcohols effects. So, you and I could be in a room, both with .1 BAC and I may have slight blurring of my vision and a change in my reaction time, whereas you won't have any affects.
So, the quick answer to your question is that .08 is a catch-all number since we cannot determine the correct BAC for each individual. The general consensus is that a .08 is the BAC an average man (170 pounds is considered average) would have after 4 full size beers. According to the studies, .08 BAC represents a 9 or 10 time increase in the chances of an automobile accident and during the initial changes from a .1BAC to .08BAC, the states that used .08 as the BAC standard had a reduction in the number of alcohol related auto fatalities of around 5-8%.
The problem with the statistics, as I alluded to earlier is that they don't typically classify "level" of intoxication in the stat reports because the numbers aren't as "shocking".
Not taking away from the severity of alcohol related accidents, but the number is inflated. To these reports, any vehicular accident where the person has ANY alcohol in the system (and I do mean any) goes down as an alcohol related accident. Further, they also classify alcohol related accidents that are NOT caused by the intoxicated individual as alcohol related accidents.
So, if you had half a beer at the local Hooters and someone rear-ends you - then chances are: it's going down as an alcohol related accident. It's how they get their numbers to look so scary.
Now - as I said - NONE OF THIS EXCUSES DRINKING AND DRIVING at any level. It's stupid and quite a selfish thing to do.
Last edited: