While I have said above that the attorney's claims might be true, a close parsing of them may reveal what has gone unsaid.
"Brandon never saw the handgun nor handled it" - does NOT say Miller did not KNOW the weapon was in the back seat. That suggests to me that Miller knew the weapon was there. He can know that without having seen it, obviously.
"...as Brandon was already on the way to pick up Mr. Miles, Mr. Miles texted Brandon and asked him to bring him his firearm." - does NOT say that Miller didn't receive and read the text before arriving. This - along with the text message that we have seen - suggests that Miller knew that Miles wanted the weapon to engage in a confrontation before arriving.
The attorney's statement is designed to make you come to the conclusion that Miller was unwitting in the entire situation, while never actually saying that. I suspect that was not accidental.
"Brandon never saw the handgun nor handled it" - does NOT say Miller did not KNOW the weapon was in the back seat. That suggests to me that Miller knew the weapon was there. He can know that without having seen it, obviously.
"...as Brandon was already on the way to pick up Mr. Miles, Mr. Miles texted Brandon and asked him to bring him his firearm." - does NOT say that Miller didn't receive and read the text before arriving. This - along with the text message that we have seen - suggests that Miller knew that Miles wanted the weapon to engage in a confrontation before arriving.
The attorney's statement is designed to make you come to the conclusion that Miller was unwitting in the entire situation, while never actually saying that. I suspect that was not accidental.