I find these statements to be incongruous. If "of course" he's HOF worthy, then there's no argument to be had. And, if a guy's been a World Champion in WWE and in another major promotion (for differing values of "major," stipulated), then he's a no-argument HOF, in my eyes. There's been, like, eleven guys that have been able to put that on their résumé, since WCW closed, and Christian is one of them.
And, as far as AEW hyping it up "more than it needed to be hyped," I disagree. I think that AEW hyped it up exactly the right amount, and fans who wanted it to be Brock, or Punk, or Batista, or somebody like that, did all the additional hyping, in their own minds, without AEW's help. It's not AEW's fault if they said "former World Champion," and you (again, "royal" you) heard "has main evented Wrestlemania."
Ugh. You SOB's have got me over here defending AEW. Now, I feel dirty.