Marvin Bagley III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like Bagley. People are talking themselves out of him, which happens every year. The problem is people are trying to solve every issue with one pick, which is never going to happen. Of course he has his weaknesses, but so does every other prospect.

I would take him over Porter 10/10, everything considered.
 
I like Bagley. People are talking themselves out of him, which happens every year. The problem is people are trying to solve every issue with one pick, which is never going to happen. Of course he has his weaknesses, but so does every other prospect.

I would take him over Porter 10/10, everything considered.
Its funny how it happens every year. Even when LeBron came into the league, there were question marks around his shot.

Every single player has question marks. No player is perfect.

Bagley adds what this team desperately needs in terms of a go to scorer potential, high level rebounding and a potential perennial all-star level player.

I take him at 2 and back in our development team to get the best out of him. I am not worried about this modern game talk. Trends are cyclical. There is more than one way to win. Be a trend setter, not a follower.
 
I am not worried about this modern game talk. Trends are cyclical. There is more than one way to win. Be a trend setter, not a follower.
Exactly. Trying to replicate GS is a fools errand. They have 3 of the greatest shooters of all time (all 3 are possibly top 5 shooters of all time), good luck recreating that.

The most talented teams win in the NBA, regardless of style. Being close-minded and saying only one style currently works, is going to seriously limit your potential going forward. When GSW reign is over, I seriously doubt it will be due to a team beating them at their own game. I do not understand everyone trying to imitate them. You're not going to do it better than they can.
 
Its funny how it happens every year. Even when LeBron came into the league, there were question marks around his shot.

Every single player has question marks. No player is perfect.

Bagley adds what this team desperately needs in terms of a go to scorer potential, high level rebounding and a potential perennial all-star level player.

I take him at 2 and back in our development team to get the best out of him. I am not worried about this modern game talk. Trends are cyclical. There is more than one way to win. Be a trend setter, not a follower.
I’m worried about Bagley’s rawness but that worry was negated somewhat by his AAU coaching model. He was coached by his father, paid by Nike, who was a former pro football coach. So with Bagley you really are getting an athletic moldable piece of clay. I’m hearing he is the Kings pick.

We are going to have to be patient with this kid. He missed one year of high school ball, was the best kid on a mid level AAU team coached by his father. We won’t know what we have until year 3 at least. My guess is our line up looks like this on opening day:

Center: Giles, KK, ZBo
Power forward: WCS, Bagley, Skal
Small forward: Hezonja, Jackson, ??
Shooting Guard: Bogdanovic, Hield, Shumpert
Point Guard: Fox, Mason, Temple
 
I think people are selling Bagley pretty short offensively. His defensive problems are warranted but this guy is so far and above guys like Faried, it isn't even funny.

He's not going to just be a garbage man on offense. He has an arsenal of post moves. The only negative is his reliance on his left hand. He also has an emerging shot as well. The garbage aspect of his game is just a plus. It's like imagine WCS being able to do everything WCS does offensively, except he gets an extra 4-6 points and 2-3 rebounds a game efficiently just purely on effort. If he had the same drive that Bagley has on the court, we wouldn't be talking about needing another big man for years.

All of the guys at the top of the draft have something they're elite at. Ayton has the elite size. Doncic elite PnR. JJJ elite switching and blocking. Bamba elite blocking. Bagley has that elite first and second jump. Is it exactly what you want your top pick to be elite at? Not necessarily but at least he's elite at something, unlike MPJ.

Bagley is going to get a handful of garbage points on top of the points he earns due to his offensive skill. If he's given 30mpg next year, I wouldn't doubt it if he puts up double doubles left and right over the course of the season. Will he be a team leading winning player over the course of his career? I don't know but I can tell you that a lot of points will be scored efficiently and a lot of rebounds will be grabbed by him. He's a very safe pick as far as those numbers go.
I couldn't agree more! On the WCS you hit the nail on the head from his effort standpoint. If he had half the motor bagley had everyone of us would love him. Bagley has special athleticism and fits todays mold of the modern big man. He dominated the ACC with just his natural touch and athleticism/hustle. Those are 2 things that will translate day 1. I know he needs to learn how to play defense but i know he can. He has great lateral quickness but being coached by his father his entire life probably hindered his development. His shot mechanics look solid and I think he have much better play-making ability than he was able to show at Duke. Oh and I can confirm from my brother that he is a really good kid and comes from a nice family. I may be a bit biased and would be fine if we drafted Luka but all of you diminishing Bagley's upside is absurd and I'd challenge anyone that doesn't think he's a safe pick to be at the very least what we all hope WCS would be and the upside of a Toronto Raptors version of Chris Bosh but bouncier. Mpj is officially off my board after being my number 1 player.
 
Its funny how it happens every year. Even when LeBron came into the league, there were question marks around his shot.

Every single player has question marks. No player is perfect.

Bagley adds what this team desperately needs in terms of a go to scorer potential, high level rebounding and a potential perennial all-star level player.

I take him at 2 and back in our development team to get the best out of him. I am not worried about this modern game talk. Trends are cyclical. There is more than one way to win. Be a trend setter, not a follower.
The best part about pairing Giles and bagley together is they both have elite lateral quickness for being 6 10. So it's very possible they can have the feet to play big but still match up well with small ball lineups. If giles and bagley can get a consistent 3 pt shot then this team will be scary good and teams will be reeling trying to match up with us. Go add Henzonja and I'll be feeling damn good about our future.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
The best part about pairing Giles and bagley together is they both have elite lateral quickness for being 6 10. So it's very possible they can have the feet to play big but still match up well with small ball lineups. If giles and bagley can get a consistent 3 pt shot then this team will be scary good and teams will be reeling trying to match up with us. Go add Henzonja and I'll be feeling damn good about our future.
I'm still not big on Hezonja but otherwise I completely agree with you.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
Who is your realistic target FA?
If he opts out, probably Wilson Chandler. Not too many other options. I don't want Rodney Hood or Trevor Ariza for different reasons.

I think that's part of the appeal of Doncic for me, and probably part of the appeal of Porter (assuming they think he's a SF and not a PF) for Vlade:

Those guys fill the SF hole. They would also slot nicely with the guys Vlade has already drafted.

C Cauley-Stein/Koufos
PF GIles/Skal
SF Doncic (or Porter)/Jackson
SG Bogdanovic/Hield
PG Fox/Mason

A full lineup of guys that Vlade drafted or traded for. I do wonder if Vlade still has faith in Willie or if he's ready to throw in the towel on him and his inconsistency. If it was the latter I think we'd see him moved this summer but my hunch is that Divac really wants to see if he'll put together a great season.

But if Bagley is the best prospect (and I have him slightly ahead of Luka) then you take him and figure the rest out.
 
If he opts out, probably Wilson Chandler. Not too many other options. I don't want Rodney Hood or Trevor Ariza for different reasons.

I think that's part of the appeal of Doncic for me, and probably part of the appeal of Porter (assuming they think he's a SF and not a PF) for Vlade:

Those guys fill the SF hole. They would also slot nicely with the guys Vlade has already drafted.

C Cauley-Stein/Koufos
PF GIles/Skal
SF Doncic (or Porter)/Jackson
SG Bogdanovic/Hield
PG Fox/Mason

A full lineup of guys that Vlade drafted or traded for. I do wonder if Vlade still has faith in Willie or if he's ready to throw in the towel on him and his inconsistency. If it was the latter I think we'd see him moved this summer but my hunch is that Divac really wants to see if he'll put together a great season.

But if Bagley is the best prospect (and I have him slightly ahead of Luka) then you take him and figure the rest out.
I think Will Barton and Joe Harris would be good targets at SF.
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
I'm a tad wary of Bagley, but I'd easily take him over Porter Jr. The health stuff is too scary.

As far as Bagley goes, I think he has as much bust potential as anyone in the top 5. Not bust as in out of the league when his rookie deal is up, but bust as in he'll just be a garbage man - low end starter or energy bench big who sticks around the league forever. You want way more than that with pick 2.

I know, I know. We'd be picking him up based on his massive potential, like Fox. Because it's totally a given he'll learn to shoot and play defense.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
I like Bagley. People are talking themselves out of him, which happens every year. The problem is people are trying to solve every issue with one pick, which is never going to happen. Of course he has his weaknesses, but so does every other prospect.

I would take him over Porter 10/10, everything considered.
It's called buyer's remorse. That's why I tend to go with first impressions. You can overthink things.
 
I don't think Bagley is really in consideration. I think we have him 3rd on our list based on all the news about Dončić and Porter. I think it's Dončić vs Porter at this point and Bagley to round out the top 3.

We may be considering Porter for trade down scenarios. I really don't know at this point. I can't wait for the draft, it should be interesting at the very least lol.
 
I'm a tad wary of Bagley, but I'd easily take him over Porter Jr. The health stuff is too scary.

As far as Bagley goes, I think he has as much bust potential as anyone in the top 5. Not bust as in out of the league when his rookie deal is up, but bust as in he'll just be a garbage man - low end starter or energy bench big who sticks around the league forever. You want way more than that with pick 2.

I know, I know. We'd be picking him up based on his massive potential, like Fox. Because it's totally a given he'll learn to shoot and play defense.
That pretty funny comment in regards to Fox. Yeah he and Bagley are the same. Very athletic and both have to learn to shoot and play defense. If they don’t start to recognize when to switch they are going to look like the keystone cops out there.

Or maybe the sticky finger bandits

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/0522eadc-0c3a-4991-a0ab-234b606a73b0
 
I don't think Bagley is really in consideration. I think we have him 3rd on our list based on all the news about Dončić and Porter. I think it's Dončić vs Porter at this point and Bagley to round out the top 3.

We may be considering Porter for trade down scenarios. I really don't know at this point. I can't wait for the draft, it should be interesting at the very least lol.
I think Bagley is the guy.
 
I’m worried about Bagley’s rawness but that worry was negated somewhat by his AAU coaching model. He was coached by his father, paid by Nike, who was a former pro football coach. So with Bagley you really are getting an athletic moldable piece of clay. I’m hearing he is the Kings pick.

We are going to have to be patient with this kid. He missed one year of high school ball, was the best kid on a mid level AAU team coached by his father. We won’t know what we have until year 3 at least. My guess is our line up looks like this on opening day:

Center: Giles, KK, ZBo
Power forward: WCS, Bagley, Skal
Small forward: Hezonja, Jackson, ??
Shooting Guard: Bogdanovic, Hield, Shumpert
Point Guard: Fox, Mason, Temple
Bagley starts day 1 in case he is the pick
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Parker could be worth a risk. I do think he's better as a smallball PF than a SF though.

Not a ton of options at SF in free agency this year though.
I don't think we have a chance of getting Parker, but if we did, I don't think if matters what you call him position wise. Put him on the floor with Giles and Bagley, and let each of them guard whoever is the best matchup. Parker could play SF on offense, and guard the other teams PF on defense. Bagley is certainly quick enough to guard SF's. How good he'll be on defense remains to be seen. But I don't put a lot of stock in how any of these players, especially one and doner's, played defense in college. Unless of course they excelled at it. Point is, just because they didn't, doesn't mean they can't.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
I don't think we have a chance of getting Parker, but if we did, I don't think if matters what you call him position wise. Put him on the floor with Giles and Bagley, and let each of them guard whoever is the best matchup. Parker could play SF on offense, and guard the other teams PF on defense. Bagley is certainly quick enough to guard SF's. How good he'll be on defense remains to be seen. But I don't put a lot of stock in how any of these players, especially one and doner's, played defense in college. Unless of course they excelled at it. Point is, just because they didn't, doesn't mean they can't.
I agree that very few college freshmen are good defenders. Especially highly touted guys who were so athletically superior that they never had to learn fundamentals.

I don't think Bagley will ever be a defensive anchor or rim protector but in time (if he puts in the work) I think he can be a very good individual and help defender and guard guys on the perimeter due to his quickness.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
I’m not so sure. If he can’t learn to play defense he will come off the bench until he does.
You know, I saw Bagley play in over 20 games, and I'm not going to defend some of his poor defense, but on the few occasions in a game where he got matched up one on one in isolation, he did a decent to good job of keeping his man in front of him. Most of his defensive breakdowns came on switching, or lack of awareness. He got caught ball watching too much as well. My point is, that I think he has the tools to be a good defender, but lacks defensive knowledge and experience. Your not going to find many complicated defensive schemes in highschool and college. Too much zone!
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
I agree that very few college freshmen are good defenders. Especially highly touted guys who were so athletically superior that they never had to learn fundamentals.

I don't think Bagley will ever be a defensive anchor or rim protector but in time (if he puts in the work) I think he can be a very good individual and help defender and guard guys on the perimeter due to his quickness.
We are in agreement! There's a long list of players whose defense was questioned coming out of college, that turned out to be decent to good defenders in the NBA. How can anyone really judge Trae Young when his coach gave him orders not to get into foul trouble because he was too important to the team. Does that mean he'll be a good defender once unleashed? Probably not, but he probably won't be as bad as everyone thinks either.
 
You know, I saw Bagley play in over 20 games, and I'm not going to defend some of his poor defense, but on the few occasions in a game where he got matched up one on one in isolation, he did a decent to good job of keeping his man in front of him. Most of his defensive breakdowns came on switching, or lack of awareness. He got caught ball watching too much as well. My point is, that I think he has the tools to be a good defender, but lacks defensive knowledge and experience. Your not going to find many complicated defensive schemes in highschool and college. Too much zone!
Yeah he clearly has the quickness to stay in front of people but, like Fox last year, he got lost on switched and defensive rotations. I think those could come but it may take some time. I don’t think Joerger will start him until he figures it out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.