My conclusion is rooted in clear-thinking rational deduction! Propose an alternate theory and I open to considerate it. The suggestion that he needs "a change of scenery" is not the least bit compelling or convincing. If he wants to move on to another city, after playing for 3 teams over the course of his career, there has to be a reason why.
Moving is a headache and a hassle if your family has established roots and grown to be part of the community.
If he wants out, there is more to it. And the more to it IMHO is a volatile and disruptive teammate who drains teammates mentally over one volatile outburst after another and detracts from the collective objective to win.
Rudy was asked pointedly what are the strengths of the team. He did NOT mention Boogie! He mentioned the young guys (Ben and Willie). Really? Ben and Willie?! Give me a friggin break!!!! Total underachiever #1 who flopped in his third season and a rookie that teammates passed to LESS than ANY player in the NBA?!?! Its almost a laughable answer when you have the best center in the game.
But his answer speaks volumes!!! The expected answer would be "Boogie...un-guard-able and dominant and gives us an advantage in the paint with his versatility size and strength and skill. Ride or die with Boogie!"
A lot of times I feel alone on the island of common sense. Anyone want to join?
Rudy either feels his game is NOT compatible with Boogie's, and indications are this is true, and/or that Boogie's professionalism is a barrier to what Rudy wants to achieve in his career. If I saw more cohesiveness between Rudy and Boogie on and off the court, I might arrive at a different conclusion, but as it stands, this conclusion is the only reasonable one.
The bottom line is if Boogie and Rudy developed genuine chemistry, as two talented players, on the court and off, Rudy would NOT want out. The degree to which both parties are accountable for this absence is a matter of debate, but I know who I hold primarily accountable.