Kings play by play announcer Grant Napear rips DeMarcus Cousins

#1
"As I was driving into the studio today, I was wondering how many times in the last six years have I had to do what I’m going to do right now, and that’s talking about DeMarcus Cousins, again stepping out of bounds, getting in trouble, getting suspended, and at what point is enough enough? I said two years ago that enough was enough, I said it last year that enough was enough, and I’m gonna say it again, alright? It’s just absolutely disgraceful that a 25 year old professional athlete has no respect for authority at all. He has ZERO respect for authority.

"You know, this isn’t an isolated incident. This has happened the very first day that he walked into Arco Arena. It started with Paul Westphal, and here we are, six years later, and it’s still going on with another coach, this guy by the name of George Karl. It’s wrong, it’s disgraceful, it’s embarrassing for the organization, and he sucks the air right out of the team. That’s not my opinion, I’ve talked to a lot of guys on the team. He sucks the air out of the locker room. Okay?

"The Kings are gonna have another bad season this year, and in my opinion, he’s largely responsible for it. He’s largely responsible for it because his teammates just flatout get sick of it. They don’t want to deal with it. He sucks the air out of the locker room. Disrespectful to your superiors, disrespectful to authoritative figures, it’s flat-out wrong. Now, I don’t know about you, okay – I’ve seen six years of it, and I’ve seen enough, okay? But I’m not – I don’t make the decisions about this organization. I have a talk show, and I announce the games. Alright? These decisions are way above my head. That’s not what I do.

"What I am saying, though, is – does this community want to move into a brand new, iconic, phenomenal building with a clean slate, or do they want the slate muddied before they even walk into the door? Does anyone think that DMC is not going to be doing the same stuff next year? Why would we think that after six years of immature, disgraceful, embarrassing behavior, that just because we’re moving into a new building, that everything’s gonna be fine and dandy?

"At some point – and this is the conclusion that I’ve come to, and again, this is my opinion – you are who you are. And that’s who DMC is. Alright? And for those of you that may call and want to talk to me about ‘Well, they haven’t put any good talent around him’, and blah blah blah, I disagree with that notion. I think the talent on this team was upgraded considerably from last year.

"But let’s just say that you’re right and I’m wrong. Let’s just say that I’ve got the wrong opinion of the talent on this team. Do you see Rudy Gay acting like this? Do you see Darren Collison acting like this? Do you see Omri Casspi acting like this? Have you seen Rajon Rondo be anything other than a consummate professional this year? Do you see Quincy Acy act like this? I mean, I can go right down the line. Alright, what about players that were here before? Did you ever see Tyreke Evans act like this? You ever see Isaiah Thomas act like this? You ever see Patrick Patterson act like this? You ever see Marcus Thornton act like this? You ever see Jimmer Fredette act like this? I mean, I can go right on down the list. The reality is that this guy has got an issue that I dont’ think is fixable. That’s my opinion. Now, I could be wrong. I’m just one guy speaking on the radio here. That’s my opinion.

"He has been nothing but a headache for this franchise, in my opinion. It’s been a headache from the day he walked into the building, and here are six years later, and it’s still a headache. And you know, it would be one thing if the Sacramento Kings were winning a lot of games with DMC on the roster. but the reality is they haven’t even come close to winning a lot of game,s and there’s a good chance they’re not going to win 30 games for the sixth year in a row this season.

"It’s one thing if you have a player on your team who’s a major pain in the you-know-what, and yet you’re winning 50 to 60 games every year and you tolerate it and you put up with it, and you turn your head the other way. But that’s not the situation here. We’re not turning our head the other way because the team’s losing every year. Every single year that DMC has been here, the team has underachieved. And they’re underachieving greatly this year.

"Now, would it be fair to put 100% of the blame on him? No, it wouldn’t. But I’m putting a lot of the blame on him. Because if your teammates don’t want to be on the court with you, then that’s your problem, that’s nobody else’s problem. And if you suck the air out of the entire organization, that’s on you. It’s not on the coach, and it’s not the general manager, and it’s not on your teammates. That is on you.

"DMC will not play [on Friday] because of conduct detrimental to the team. How many times has that happened in six years? How many times has there been conduct detrimental to the team over the last six years where he wasn’t punished for it, or you didn’t know about it, or that it went on and nobody knew about it? I can tell you that the number of times is numerous. That’s what I can tell you. It’s not just once in a while, it’s all the freaking time. The guy does not respect authority.

"And I don’t want to hear about how he hates to lose, alright? I know a lot of the guys on the team, both past and present, they hate to lose also. they hate to lose also. They don’t act like this. People say he’s frustrated. You don’t think Rudy Gay’s frustrated? You don’t think Darren Collison’s frustrated? You don’t think Omri Casspi’s frustrated? Do you see them act like this?

"Why does DMC feel that he’s entitled to act like this? What has he ever accomplished in his career? Seriously, what’s he ever accomplished? What gives him the right to act like this when the rest of the teammates over the last six years have acted like professionals? What’s he so different? Why is he so different than the other players he’s played with over the six years? What gives him the ability to think that he can act however he wants and that it’s okay? What gives him the notion to think that he can act the way he acted last night and on numerous, numerous, numerous occasions over six years, and that that is conducive to winning?

"I keep on hearing how DeMarcus Cousins, all he wants to do is win. He’s not capable of winning! He’s not capable of winning because he doesn’t allow the team to win, because he sucks the air out of the team all the time! You can’t win when you’re the reason why you’re holding back your team with your actions! Six years we’ve been dealing with this! Six years! It’s not getting any better! Six years! I hear ‘Well, he’s very talented.’ Yeah, he is very talented. ’He’s an All-Star.’ Yes, he is an All-Star, okay. Do you care about how talented a guy is, or do you care about whether the team wins or not?

"He wants to win, but he doesn’t realize he’s his own worst enemy. He keeps on saying how much he wants to win, but he doesn’t realize that by his actions, he’s preventing his team from winning! He keeps on talking about how important it is to win, and he hates losing, but he doesn’t understand that the reason why the team loses so much is because his actions kill the team! Pretty easy to understand, pretty easy to see, isn’t it? How many more – are we going to have to deal with this next year, and then the year after that? How many times does a guy have to cross the line before you realize that it’s not working, period?

"I don’t know about you, I’ve always been about the name on the front of the jersey here, ever since I walked into town in 1987. I’m all about the Sacramento Kings, alright? The jersey does not say Sacramento Cousins, it says Sacramento Kings. That’s what I care about. Do you think I like sitting here watching the team lose every night? No. Do you think I think you like watching the team lose every night? No. Do I want to go into this brand new, amazing, Golden 1 Center with this type of cloud hanging over the organization? No, I don’t. What about you? Do you want to? Think about it. Think about everything that we’ve worked for in this community, which we are going to see come to fruition a couple months from now. Think about it.

"I want you to think about, during this commercial break, everything that we’ve dealt with in this community for the last five years. I want you to think about all the dark days that we had trying to save this team. I want you to think about all those city council meetings where we were on pins and needles. I want you to think about all the meetings that happened in New York with the NBA Board of Governors where we were on pins and needles. I want you to think about those dark days. And I I want you to think about what is ahead in October.

"We have a chance to have bright blue skies and starry nights. It’s right there in front of us. is that possible with #15 on your team? That’s for the Sacramento Kings to decide, not me. But I know this; after six years of repetitive behavior and disrespect of authority, that;s very disconcerting."
I can't disagree with him much. I just feel like as talented as Cousins is (and let me be clear, he's the best big man in the NBA today and its not even close) he's been in the news more for his behavioral issues rather than his play since he came into the league. The weird thing is that he's such a great guy off the court and he doesn't have any kind of criminal history or anything but its just his on court issues have taken away from his fantastic play.
 
#2
Honestly, who really cares what the blow hard Napear thinks? We're talking about the same guy that screams and cuts off callers to hear himself speak. Many fans don't even like him. Like Howard Stern, the haters listen twice as long as the actual fans of the show. That's the only reason he gets good ratings, not because he's ever right about anything.

Like Ailene Poison, Napear chose a side a long time ago and will cling to it through thick and thin no matter what Cousins does. If I recall correctly, he even got on Chris Webber's bad side despite the fact that team was successful.

It's one thing to have an opinion. But what Napear does takes it to a different level. And let's not forget his turncoat ways. The dude would defend the Magoof family to no end until it was no longer convenient for him.
 
#3
Sigh....and here we go again.
Napear with his "everybody got to be a good soldier thing". Do we have any proof for Napears thesis, that Cousins drags the team down? No we haven't. If he would truly drag the team down, someone would step up as soon as he sits. This hasn't happened year after year.
This debate is not about basketball anymore. It's solely about Cousins personality. Some people just can't stand the human being Demarcus Cousins, because their values don't allow it. They can't stand hostility, antiauthoritarian behaviour or a person with clear cut values of "right" and "wrong".
Now everybody has their own values and I'm certainly not a guy, who believes he is able to judge peoples value system.
But this debate should refocus on basketball again.

Are we a better team without Cousins? No we aren't. Nothing to dicuss there.
Are we a better team without Cousins but with new assets we may aquire in a Cousins trade? Now this is where it gets interesting, but this doesn't require rants about Cousins personality or a media guy like Napear dragging Cousins through the mud (actually by doing so, Napear hurts the Kings, because it might impact Cousins trade value by making the Kings look desperate to get rid of him).

But first and foremost this franchise needs a vision, a goal and an idea how to reach it.
Do we want to run our offense through a big man? Than Cousins is our best bet. There is no other big man in this league, that is even close to Cousins as a first option.
Do we want to change our playstyle to a more perimeter oriented game, where big man are only finishers and lob targets, but are mainly responsible for defense and rebounding.
Well than Cousins might be the huge trade chip we need to accomplish this.

This is literally the only reason to even think of a Cousins trade.
You don't trade a superstar (and yes Grant, that's excactly what Cousins is), because you can't stand his personality.
The decision to trade Cousins needs to have a solid base. "he is such a cancer and I can't stand him" is not a solid base.
 
#13
Like him or hate him, I challenge the Cuz crowd to tell me what he said there that's factually incorrect.
I don't consider myself belonging to any kind of "Cuz crowd" but some things are just factually incorrect.

This has happened the very first day that he walked into Arco Arena.
I don't know it for a fact but I doubt he argued with a coach on his first day. Yes, thats a hyperbole but still it is probalby not a correct statement.

The Kings are gonna have another bad season this year, and in my opinion, he’s largely responsible for it.
There is no way to falsify this statement but I guess if you asked objective independent raters that know basketball to list alle the reasons why the Sacramento Kings lose this much games in 2015-2016 ordered by their importance Demarcus Cousins would probably not be the first one on the list, but this is what the statement implies.

you are who you are.
This implies the Cousins or any other person will never change their behavior. Grant obviously thinks that behavior is mostly determined by "personality" that does not allow for someone to change his behavior. This is incorrect. Actually, behavior is determined by a lots of variables and there is empirical evidence that people tend to overestimate the "power of personality" and underestimate the "power of situational causes" in explaining human behavior (called "the Fundamental Attribution Error").
http://www.psychwiki.com/wiki/The_Fundamental_Attribution_Error

The guy does not respect authority.
Generalization and therefore probably incorrect. I doubt that Demarcus has not once in his whole life respected a authority but that is what this statement implies.

after six years of repetitive behavior and disrespect of authority
This implies that he had issues with every single coach and that is not correct. See Mike Malone who is the only head coach that knows what he is doing.

Now please don't read this as if I defend Cuz or try to downplay all of his actions in the past. But you challenged me and I accepted :p
 
#14
I don't consider myself belonging to any kind of "Cuz crowd" but some things are just factually incorrect.


I don't know it for a fact but I doubt he argued with a coach on his first day. Yes, thats a hyperbole but still it is probalby not a correct statement.


There is no way to falsify this statement but I guess if you asked objective independent raters that know basketball to list alle the reasons why the Sacramento Kings lose this much games in 2015-2016 ordered by their importance Demarcus Cousins would probably not be the first one on the list, but this is what the statement implies.


This implies the Cousins or any other person will never change their behavior. Grant obviously thinks that behavior is mostly determined by "personality" that does not allow for someone to change his behavior. This is incorrect. Actually, behavior is determined by a lots of variables and there is empirical evidence that people tend to overestimate the "power of personality" and underestimate the "power of situational causes" in explaining human behavior (called "the Fundamental Attribution Error").
http://www.psychwiki.com/wiki/The_Fundamental_Attribution_Error


Generalization and therefore probably incorrect. I doubt that Demarcus has not once in his whole life respected a authority but that is what this statement implies.


This implies that he had issues with every single coach and that is not correct. See Mike Malone who is the only head coach that knows what he is doing.

Now please don't read this as if I defend Cuz or try to downplay all of his actions in the past. But you challenged me and I accepted :p
You basically said nothing, don't hold Grant in very high regard but all you said was- "maybe he's wrong"...

The only reason I am replying to this post is the bit about behaviour- I do believe you are right that people underestimate the "power of situational causes" and the causes in this case is a guy who went through 6 years of a disfunctioning team where everyone catered for him.
Now what you are suggesting is that if we'll kick out a coach that he had trouble with (even considering we should fire Karl objectively) it will somehow help change his behaviour- why would that make a change in his behaviour?

But honestly I don't really care about it that much, the main thing for me is after this season he'll have 2 years left on his contract and our chances to turn this team into a team that could do anything meaningful is extremely low, the window for winning with DMC is closing- we better leverage what we can to create a team with a bright future instead of the bleak future we'll have if we'll wait too long before trading him.
 
I

Im Still Ballin

Guest
#15
You basically said nothing, don't hold Grant in very high regard but all you said was- "maybe he's wrong"...

The only reason I am replying to this post is the bit about behaviour- I do believe you are right that people underestimate the "power of situational causes" and the causes in this case is a guy who went through 6 years of a disfunctioning team where everyone catered for him.
Now what you are suggesting is that if we'll kick out a coach that he had trouble with (even considering we should fire Karl objectively) it will somehow help change his behaviour- why would that make a change in his behaviour?

But honestly I don't really care about it that much, the main thing for me is after this season he'll have 2 years left on his contract and our chances to turn this team into a team that could do anything meaningful is extremely low, the window for winning with DMC is closing- we better leverage what we can to create a team with a bright future instead of the bleak future we'll have if we'll wait too long before trading him.
Great post.
 
#16
You basically said nothing, don't hold Grant in very high regard but all you said was- "maybe he's wrong"...

The only reason I am replying to this post is the bit about behaviour- I do believe you are right that people underestimate the "power of situational causes" and the causes in this case is a guy who went through 6 years of a disfunctioning team where everyone catered for him.
Now what you are suggesting is that if we'll kick out a coach that he had trouble with (even considering we should fire Karl objectively) it will somehow help change his behaviour- why would that make a change in his behaviour?

But honestly I don't really care about it that much, the main thing for me is after this season he'll have 2 years left on his contract and our chances to turn this team into a team that could do anything meaningful is extremely low, the window for winning with DMC is closing- we better leverage what we can to create a team with a bright future instead of the bleak future we'll have if we'll wait too long before trading him.
To your first point:
Yeah you're right, it is kind of hard to 100% falsify anything that Grant said because he is rhetorcially experienced enough to chose his words in a careful way. For example he used a lot of rhetorical questions and "that's my opinion"s because he knows you can't falsify a question and an opinion. And those few statement that he made nearly can't be tested for us listeners because we don't have the necessary information available, for example the stuff about no know does want to play with Cousins. How could we know if this is true or not? We would need access to interviews with all players that got asked if they would want to play with him. Obviously we don't have this.

To your second point/question:
Well I would envision something like this: If you have a coach that Cousins respects and they have a positive relationship based on accountability and loyality from both sides AND this coach is competent enough to make the Kings win then I would bet that Cousins would not scream at him during a time out despite possesing this personality trait of questioning authory.
situational change -> behavior change
If this happened it would give evidence that Cousins indeed changed his behavior. And moreover, we actually have evidence that this has happened in the past under Malone. So that was my reasoning but of course noone can predict the future so we will just have to wait and see Vlade will do :)
 
#17
There is power strugle on this team. The players (cousins as leader) want to run the team and expect to have coaches who will work with them the way they see fit. Of course the coaches think that is backwards thinking. Cousins supporters think that is fine because Cousins is so talented. Unfortunately we dont have high character players like Durant who can work with any coach. The players are tanking. But they blame it on the coach and lay down every night. Who cares about the millions they are being paid by the fans who pay for tickets. But we need to find a coach who can make them happy. That way Cousins free throw percentage can come back up.
 
#18
To your first point:
Yeah you're right, it is kind of hard to 100% falsify anything that Grant said because he is rhetorcially experienced enough to chose his words in a careful way. For example he used a lot of rhetorical questions and "that's my opinion"s because he knows you can't falsify a question and an opinion. And those few statement that he made nearly can't be tested for us listeners because we don't have the necessary information available, for example the stuff about no know does want to play with Cousins. How could we know if this is true or not? We would need access to interviews with all players that got asked if they would want to play with him. Obviously we don't have this.

To your second point/question:
Well I would envision something like this: If you have a coach that Cousins respects and they have a positive relationship based on accountability and loyality from both sides AND this coach is competent enough to make the Kings win then I would bet that Cousins would not scream at him during a time out despite possesing this personality trait of questioning authory.
situational change -> behavior change
If this happened it would give evidence that Cousins indeed changed his behavior. And moreover, we actually have evidence that this has happened in the past under Malone. So that was my reasoning but of course noone can predict the future so we will just have to wait and see Vlade will do :)
I didn't mean to be hard on the first part, you are obviously right in that you and I can't prove or disprove him I don't hold him in high regard but I don't see why he'll lie on this, maybe he is exaggerating but I would find it hard to believe he's lying. I do agree though he is probably putting too much focus on certain things.

About the second (and more important) part- I think that the "questioning authority" trait he may or may not have is the less important part, the more important part is that through this 6 years Cousins has learned that the real authority is the one he holds and firing another coach he didn't get along with (and again we should fire Karl regardless) is only going to make it worse.

It's hard to have respect for your coach when you know you hold all the power and know you can get him fired and come out the other side unscathed, and that's the "situational change" I talked about that's not working in Cousins's favor.
 
#19
I didn't mean to be hard on the first part, you are obviously right in that you and I can't prove or disprove him I don't hold him in high regard but I don't see why he'll lie on this, maybe he is exaggerating but I would find it hard to believe he's lying. I do agree though he is probably putting too much focus on certain things.

About the second (and more important) part- I think that the "questioning authority" trait he may or may not have is the less important part, the more important part is that through this 6 years Cousins has learned that the real authority is the one he holds and firing another coach he didn't get along with (and again we should fire Karl regardless) is only going to make it worse.

It's hard to have respect for your coach when you know you hold all the power and know you can get him fired and come out the other side unscathed, and that's the "situational change" I talked about that's not working in Cousins's favor.
Thanks for pointing this out, I hadn't thought about that until now. I think we can agree that the whole situation is highly complex and is really tough to deal with. It will be interesting to see what will happen this summer.
 
#20
There is power strugle on this team. The players (cousins as leader) want to run the team and expect to have coaches who will work with them the way they see fit. Of course the coaches think that is backwards thinking. Cousins supporters think that is fine because Cousins is so talented. Unfortunately we dont have high character players like Durant who can work with any coach. The players are tanking. But they blame it on the coach and lay down every night. Who cares about the millions they are being paid by the fans who pay for tickets. But we need to find a coach who can make them happy. That way Cousins free throw percentage can come back up.
I'm sorry, but in the beginning of the year it appeared the players were trying. When things were obviously not working, who wouldn't change and adopt?

They make millions but they're still human. "You" work for an organization and your not put in a situation to succeed, it doesn't matter how much or how little you make, it's hard to be Don Quixote and charge the windmill again and again and ................................ again.
 
#21
I'm sorry, but in the beginning of the year it appeared the players were trying. When things were obviously not working, who wouldn't change and adopt?

They make millions but they're still human. "You" work for an organization and your not put in a situation to succeed, it doesn't matter how much or how little you make, it's hard to be Don Quixote and charge the windmill again and again and ................................ again.
It takes more than half a season to build a team. We had a five game win streak and the team just quit after Cousins made the allstar team. The players are humans with low character so of course they are to be excused.
 
#24
Really the argument is "Coaches Scheme" vs. "Players Effort" . I think many of us have determined the majority of the blame should go to Pace, Dumb defense, poor rotations, playing small, not playing Willie enough, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam.

I'm tired of watching Karls style of play and I am sure as H$%# the players are tired of his crap. Old Coach Karl stuck with his dumb pace plan until he has lost the locker room.

I am done with Karl he needs to move on.
 
I

Im Still Ballin

Guest
#25
The voice of the people. Grant always has good insight. We are lucky to have him. We have one of the better commentary duos in the league.
 
#26
I cannot stand authoritarian people. Grant is one. They believe in strict obedience to authority, at the expense of personal freedom.

Boogie, myself, brick, many boogie defenders, are not that type so we get Boogie. Other's flat out do not and never will and want obedient little soldiers. These are the people who demand the players give 100% no matter what is happening, what corpse is coaching the team, etc. You have a job, DO IT! No excuses! Ronald McDonald could be coaching the team and that's no excuse, 100% effort and obedience is required at all time. Authority rules!

If you think the position a person is in life is what demands authority, then you'll never under Cuz. If you thought a backstabbing, manipulative, lying sack of crap (and that was just what Karl did to get the job) would be able to demand Cuz's respect just by showing up (and many of you clearly still think that should be the case), then we might as well have just traded Cuz last summer like Karl wanted.

You EARN Cuz's respect. Karl, from what i've seen, hasn't earned the respect of a single guy on that team. My God grant, you're going to use rudy Gay as an example of a good little soldier. Really? He mailed it in all goddamn season. So, like most King's fans (and gee, I wonder where they get this idea from) it's better to have no effort players than those that scowl. Better to have guys like Rondo, completely selfish, stat driven, won't pass to guys that won't pad his assist numbers, will not take a layup to chase an assist, hasn't guarded anyone all season. But Rondo is a "consummate professional."

But anyway, for those who haven't seen just how biased Grant is, or haven't heard him on the radio, there's a good taste. It's longwinded, fact free nonsense. Always has been. It's based on truthiness and feelings. And fans eat it up cause they want someone to blame. I know, the guy averaging 27/11. It's probably him!

As for the evidence I want, I want to hear teammates say they hate Demarcus. Because that's Grant's thesis. So, where's the evidence? That's a BFD, because if the entire team hates him as Grant says, man, I feel like we would have heard that from teammates by now. And if that's the case, then trade him. But I'd like to hear someone go on the record and say it.

Otherwise Grant's rants are just empty to me. I really need to see proof teammates are sick of Demarcus.

Edit: I need to add Rondo, the consummate professional, used a gay slur against a gay ref this year. I rate that as worse than cussing out a coach for not defending players.
 
Last edited:
#27
It takes more than half a season to build a team. We had a five game win streak and the team just quit after Cousins made the allstar team. The players are humans with low character so of course they are to be excused.
How deflating has it been, seeing hope for the playoffs only to realize it most likely ain't happening? I don't like it and I'm not the one playing.

Did the players have hope that the situation would change during the all-star break, only to realize it was going to be same-O, same-O?

You seem to think if the players quit, then they have low character but what of a coach that seemed to never even seemed to try?
 
#28
Why yes Grant, I have seen Rondo act like something other than a consummate professional this year, and he got suspended for it by the league (not the team). He sees what he wants. Cousins may be difficult, but the reason he shows up for his job to talk about Cousins a lot of the time over the past six years is because there usually isn't much else to talk about.

Laughing at his notion that there has been talent surrounding Cousins, and then gets to Patterson and Jimmer by the time he names ten players when naming teammates who act(ed) professionally.
 
#29
I just want to put this quote from one of my favorite Coaches of all time right here:

"Don't tell me what a player can't do. Show me what he can do and we'll utilize his strengths." - Bill Walsh
 
Last edited:
#30
I cannot stand authoritarian people. Grant is one. They believe in strict obedience to authority, at the expense of personal freedom.

Boogie, myself, brick, many boogie defenders, are not that type so we get Boogie. Other's flat out do not and never will and want obedient little soldiers. These are the people who demand the players give 100% no matter what is happening, what corpse is coaching the team, etc. You have a job, DO IT! No excuses! Ronald McDonald could be coaching the team and that's no excuse, 100% effort and obedience is required at all time. Authority rules!

If you think the position a person is in life is what demands authority, then you'll never under Cuz. If you thought a backstabbing, manipulative, lying sack of poopoo (and that was just what Karl did to get the job) would be able to demand Cuz's respect just by showing up (and many of you clearly still think that should be the case), then we might as well have just traded Cuz last summer like Karl wanted.

You EARN Cuz's respect. Karl, from what i've seen, hasn't earned the respect of a single guy on that team. My God grant, you're going to use rudy Gay as an example of a good little soldier. Really? He mailed it in all goddamn season. So, like most King's fans (and gee, I wonder where they get this idea from) it's better to have no effort players than those that scowl. Better to have guys like Rondo, completely selfish, stat driven, won't pass to guys that won't pad his assist numbers, will not take a layup to chase an assist, hasn't guarded anyone all season. But Rondo is a "consummate professional."

But anyway, for those who haven't seen just how biased Grant is, or haven't heard him on the radio, there's a good taste. It's longwinded, fact free nonsense. Always has been. It's based on truthiness and feelings. And fans eat it up cause they want someone to blame. I know, the guy averaging 27/11. It's probably him!

As for the evidence I want, I want to hear teammates say they hate Demarcus. Because that's Grant's thesis. So, where's the evidence? That's a BFD, because if the entire team hates him as Grant says, man, I feel like we would have heard that from teammates by now. And if that's the case, then trade him. But I'd like to hear someone go on the record and say it.

Otherwise Grant's rants are just empty to me. I really need to see proof teammates are sick of Demarcus.
I agree with a lot of your post, especially the last part. Grant makes a heavy claim in this rant and never supports it with any evidence.