You're a grown-assed man, Cap'n: you couldn't have possibly thought that, when I said "believe in Cousins," I meant, "look to a twenty-three year-old kid as a mentor."
I've got to beg to differ with your assessment that most Kings Fans are "satisfied" with the progress that Cousins has made, because (to me) it carries an inference that we'd be okay if he's already reached his plateau. What I think that most of us believe is that his progress has been at at pace that is appropriate and suitable to his level of development. I feel that the disconnect comes where it appears as though you expect a level of maturity out of a twenty-three year-old that is not consistent with the expected maturity level of the average twenty-three year-old. Your posts read as though you feel that, because Cousins it the best player on the team, you are evaluating him based on what you expect to be the maturity level of a franchise player, while disregarding the fact that he is considerably younger than the average franchise player, and neither has he had the benefit of a strong foundation to help teach him how to conduct himself.
Considering what he's dealt with in four years (losing culture, poisonous locker room, carpetbagging ownership, poor management, one coach who hated him, another who was utterly incompetent, neither of which had his best interests at heart), I'm astonished that he's even as mature as he is. I'm not "satisfied" with his progress, but I also understand that, unless you're the Strong Muldoon, you can't get blood out of a stone. He's getting there, and there's nothing at all atypical about how long it's taking him to get there. I think you forget that kids like Paul George are the exception, not kids like Cousins.
I've got to beg to differ with your assessment that most Kings Fans are "satisfied" with the progress that Cousins has made, because (to me) it carries an inference that we'd be okay if he's already reached his plateau. What I think that most of us believe is that his progress has been at at pace that is appropriate and suitable to his level of development. I feel that the disconnect comes where it appears as though you expect a level of maturity out of a twenty-three year-old that is not consistent with the expected maturity level of the average twenty-three year-old. Your posts read as though you feel that, because Cousins it the best player on the team, you are evaluating him based on what you expect to be the maturity level of a franchise player, while disregarding the fact that he is considerably younger than the average franchise player, and neither has he had the benefit of a strong foundation to help teach him how to conduct himself.
Considering what he's dealt with in four years (losing culture, poisonous locker room, carpetbagging ownership, poor management, one coach who hated him, another who was utterly incompetent, neither of which had his best interests at heart), I'm astonished that he's even as mature as he is. I'm not "satisfied" with his progress, but I also understand that, unless you're the Strong Muldoon, you can't get blood out of a stone. He's getting there, and there's nothing at all atypical about how long it's taking him to get there. I think you forget that kids like Paul George are the exception, not kids like Cousins.