I don't get the obsession with trade ideas for Willie? The idea to to add players not keep trading them away.
If vlade is convinced Jackson will be a star sure. But if he isn't sure there isn't a good reason to. We could be trading to serviceable piece for another mclemore.To get a potentially franchise changing player. If that trade was available and if Jackson was on the board, it would be hard for me to pass up.
would you guys trade 10 and WCS for the 3rd pick IF jackson was still available. If the kings can keep their 5th pick, then I would have to consider that.
To get a potentially franchise changing player. If that trade was available and if Jackson was on the board, it would be hard for me to pass up.
You want to know why the Spurs and the Warriors and all the good teams are good? Because they don't do this.
I don't know why I keep revisting this thought process but here is my opinion anyway.
If we are looking to trade a player it should be between either vets that don't fit the plan in the next two years, or if its a youth, then you deal from the position you have more players than minutes. SG.
Even setting aside how one projects Willie's potential, we have Willie Papa and KK at the 5. KK is not likely to be re-signed if he even finishes his current contract. Leaving 2 players at the 5 going forward.
Meanwhile we are talking about playing Richardson, Bogdan, Temple, and even Buddy (PG, really?) out of position to fill holes and find them minutes. Makes no sense to me.
The reason you see WCS mentioned in a lot of trade scenarios is because other fanbases know he has potential to be special, and is already servicable going into his 3rd year. They aren't trying to do us a solid and take a "low motor, not as advertised defender" on a rookie contract off our hands as a favor.
@KingsFanGER
You focused entirely on my last paragraph without adressing the point of my post.
Stacked at SG. Thin everywhere else. So why trade anyone if not a vet that doesn't fit our long term outlook, or one of too many SG's?
And while I know your point about fans consuming Willie highlights on YT is valid, fact is fans won't be making the trades.
Just curious why vets and our plethora of SG's aren't the ones bandied about in hypothetical trades when they seem the best options, if any, from the Kings perspective.
Sure they do! Just a few years ago, the spurs traded a young likely role player for a mid lotto pick-- I think that turned out pretty well for them!
That said, I don't care for any of the WCS deals I've seen so far
How do other fanbases judge the potential of Willie or any other player of the Kings? Well I assume it's by watching YT highlight vids (let's be honest only true basketball masochists manage to sit through more than a couple of Kings games over a season).
So basically I trust their opinion as much as I trust the yearly analysis of the upcoming draft class by most NBA fans on the internet.
So far the harsh reality is, that Willie hasn't met the expectation of being an upper echolon defender. Of course we can debate the reasons for this, but that alone doesn't change this simple truth.
That doesn't mean we should trade him. But it means things are not entirely rosy with regards to Willies NBA career.
That's because it was the only thing I disgreed with and in my usual "the glass is half empty" approach I focused solely on the negative, instead of agreeing with you on the points you made beforehand.
I apologize for being a negative ass sometimes....
One thing to add: Willie may have more value than any of our guards except Hield.
Lest we forget
Hey, it beats talking about Randolph being an idiot.
Lest we forget
Hey, it beats talking about Randolph being an idiot.
The dunk that got Boogie traded
It definitely point an exclamation mark on the thought I am sure.The dunk that got Boogie traded
I completely agree, and love that dunk!!I believe it was Newton that said, "For every action, there is an equal reaction". In the case of Cuz being traded, the reaction seemed to be a better version of Willie. This is an important year for Willie. He needs to show that the last 20 or so games of the season wasn't an aberration. He needs to prove that he's the future starting center for the Kings. At years end, if I'm correct, he's eligible for an extension. That will be an important decision for the Kings. Willie is loaded with potential, but he has to turn that potential into tangible results.
I've been a big fan of Willie's, and I hope we see him take a giant step forward. I hope this is his break out year. For his sake, and for the Kings sake.
I believe it was Newton that said, "For every action, there is an equal reaction". In the case of Cuz being traded, the reaction seemed to be a better version of Willie. This is an important year for Willie. He needs to show that the last 20 or so games of the season wasn't an aberration. He needs to prove that he's the future starting center for the Kings. At years end, if I'm correct, he's eligible for an extension. That will be an important decision for the Kings. Willie is loaded with potential, but he has to turn that potential into tangible results.
I've been a big fan of Willie's, and I hope we see him take a giant step forward. I hope this is his break out year. For his sake, and for the Kings sake.
I'm definitely pulling for him to succeed. His athleticism is so unique for a center, I think it fits well in the current NBA meta.It's make or break for him. We will know what he is after this year. If he steps up as a quality starter, or falters out off the bench again.. it's a big thing for the franchise either way