I intentionally didn't include him because the assets we're looking to move (Gay/McLemore/Koufos) aren't enough to get him, so he is a bit of a moot point.I voted "other" for Eric Bledsoe.
Would a bag of potato chips be included under "Other?"
The addition by subtraction rule has always applied to Rudy.
1st choice: justice Winslow (since Rudy wants to go to Miami)
2nd choice: Stanley Johnson
I only included somewhat realistic targets in the poll. Like the poster above said, we'd probably have to include WCS in the deal to get either of those guys.1st choice: justice Winslow (since Rudy wants to go to Miami)
2nd choice: Stanley Johnson
Id like to redact my choice of "other" and choose Alec Burks. That guy is a straight shooter with upper management written all over him.
I disagree. I think we need a starting PG (Collison puts out a lot of effort, but he does really well coming off the bench and we need a scorer off the bench). I think WCS will show signs of growth this season and make the starting PF spot his (it's what we drafted him for after all, not to mention we finally have a good defensive coach to tap into his defensive talent/potential).We have a team. What do we need most? A PF amongst starters and a back up PG. if Vlade wants to get rid of Gay then he has dug the hole of needs much deeper. The only current player I want to see gone is Ben. You can't trade Gay for a starting PF, a backup PG and a starting SF. Doing nothing might be better than outing Gay.
I disagree. I think we need a starting PG (Collison puts out a lot of effort, but he does really well coming off the bench and we need a scorer off the bench). I think WCS will show signs of growth this season and make the starting PF spot his (it's what we drafted him for after all, not to mention we finally have a good defensive coach to tap into his defensive talent/potential).
Taj Gibson was a possibility for a starting PF, but now with the Bulls running 3 ball dominant guards and no Pau, they need Gibson and Rudy wouldn't fit in at all with them. I still think the best bets are Miami, Thunder, and the Suns. The Suns have a pair of PGs (one that I like, but is frequently injured, the other would be decent value in return) and Miami has Dragic, who is big for a PG and would fit the mold we set this offseason (he's my choice in the above list). However, Miami doesn't really get any better trading Dragic for Gay, if anything, they would definitely want to keep Dragic and get Rudy alongside him. The Thunder are an option too, but I don't like anything they have to offer. Payne hasn't proven a thing and you don't trade a proven scorer for an unproven PG.
Darkhorse trade partner: Boston
It's possible, but I think Vlade is a GM that greatly values draft picks and seems to have learned his lesson of not trading them away like hot cakes (think Philly trade). I also think you're right on the 2020 aspect, but I'm not 100% sure.Maybe Miami would do Dragic for Gay if we throw in some pick swapsHow far out do we have to go to find a draft pick we can offer to swap - 2020?
It's possible, but I think Vlade is a GM that greatly values draft picks and seems to have learned his lesson of not trading them away like hot cakes (think Philly trade). I also think you're right on the 2020 aspect, but I'm not 100% sure.
Dragic is a steady vet that knows how to play, and most importantly, can run a team. However, getting him would be difficult. I think Miami would be the hardest trade partner to work with out of the 3 I listed, mostly because getting Gay while giving up Dragic doesn't make any sense for them (unless we include Collison, which is entirely possible because we have Temple now). The only issue is that we would be giving out a lot of good veteran/proven talent while not getting much back.
We have a team. What do we need most? A PF amongst starters and a back up PG. if Vlade wants to get rid of Gay then he has dug the hole of needs much deeper. The only current player I want to see gone is Ben. You can't trade Gay for a starting PF, a backup PG and a starting SF. Doing nothing might be better than outing Gay.
Agreed. If they wanted Collison too, I really don't see anyone on their roster that the Kings would want apart from Dragic (they obviously will not move their other main pieces, like you said). So it turns out to be a Rudy-Dragic swap (which worked on trade machine), but that doesn't do anything for them. StalemateDragic is definitely the only realistic player Miama might consider moving. Winslow and Whiteside are the new cornerstones of their franchise.
I think its good for us, but it leaves Houston without a PG and Charlotte taking on some pretty old players.View attachment 5754 I think this trade would be great for all involved. We get guys who fit our new identity, and get rid of a player who doesn't want to be here.
Brandon Knight!!!!Very simple premise... If Vlade is in fact sold on the idea of trading Gay and there is no chance we are keeping him around this year, what player would be your preference?
That's the "lazy" approach when assessing Gay's impact on a team. The same people tend to think if Cousins was any good that we would be winning 40-50 games.
All it is are people looking to take the easy way out when trying to explain an outcome. Either they don't have the time or don't care to inform themselves enough. There's no problem with that. You have the right to take any stance you want, but it's going to leave your arguments looking weak and vulnerable when posting here.