Slightly off-topic but somewhat relevant... what happens to ST Arena if the sale to Seattle goes thru? It would be awesome if Burkle, having stepped aside from the ownership group, said he is now committed to investing in the Downtown project - with a state of the art ESC regardless of whether the Kings say or not.
If the Kings stay, they would of course be the anchor tenant. If they don't, once the sale is done it removes the non-compete clause and leaves the Seattle group holding the bag on an old, obsolete arena that would draw no business (thanks to the new ESC), no way to sell it (who would want it?) or remodel it (building moratorium and a VERY uncooperative city council with LOTS of red tape).
I know, unlikely without an anchor tenant but still... there is a lot of money to be made by revamping our downtown. Someone is going to tap into that sooner or later.
If the Kings stay, they would of course be the anchor tenant. If they don't, once the sale is done it removes the non-compete clause and leaves the Seattle group holding the bag on an old, obsolete arena that would draw no business (thanks to the new ESC), no way to sell it (who would want it?) or remodel it (building moratorium and a VERY uncooperative city council with LOTS of red tape).
I know, unlikely without an anchor tenant but still... there is a lot of money to be made by revamping our downtown. Someone is going to tap into that sooner or later.