Voisin: Petrie not revealing game plan just yet

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/259317.html

Ailene Voisin: Petrie not revealing game plan just yet
By Ailene Voisin - Bee Columnist
Published 12:32 am PDT Friday, July 6, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1


Geoff Petrie went to Las Vegas to observe the Kings' summer-league games, and by the time he returns, he should have gained a much better sense of direction. And then it will be time to spill his secret.

Elevator or escalator?

Fast or faster?

Either he points one way and the Kings immerse themselves in an aggressive, full-bore rebuilding undertaking. Or he points the other way, and the makeover becomes more of an incremental and methodical endeavor, with all eyes peering toward the potentially rich free-agent opportunities in the offseason of 2009.

Kings fans desperately want to know. Give them a sign, a signal, or heck, send them a telegram: Can the club's basketball president immediately initiate the process -- with a series of shrewd, significant moves for younger, promising players who are capable of growing collectively -- without exacerbating an already problematic team payroll situation? Or is this going to be two years of doing penance while praying for another Greg Oden?

Petrie isn't saying. But he's looking. He's looking hard.

"A lot of the center of gravity is going to be here for the next eight or 10 days," Petrie said, "so there will be ample opportunity to talk to other teams, watch players on your own team, as well as players on other teams. Things could surface that are unknown as of now. And you can start signing (free agents) and trading players on the 11th."

Petrie's balancing act is complicated by the fact that, since the breakup of the beloved bunch in 2004 -- the Vlade Divac, Peja Stojakovic and Chris Webber era that began with the big strike year of 1999 -- he has spent freely for less. The Kings continue to rank right up there with the league leaders in overpaid slugs.

Brad Miller will earn $13.5 million next season. Mike Bibby is on the books for $13.5 million. Ron Artest is a bargain at $7.8 million, particularly when compared to the 2007-08 salaries of Kenny Thomas ($7.3 million), Shareef Abdur-Rahim ($5.8 million) and John Salmons ($4.7 million).

"At some point, you have to exercise restraint," Petrie acknowledged. "Can you get a player who is going to change the direction of your team? Probably not. And you have to ask, How many of those midlevel contracts do you want when your team is trying to refurbish?"

And he prefers the term "refurbish" to "rebuild" because ... ?

Because he says he believes the Kings already have a few of the building blocks, foremost among them Kevin Martin, the emerging Francisco García, the potential of rookie Spencer Hawes, Quincy Douby and Justin Williams. That goes along with the possibility -- and this is a stretch here -- that new coach Reggie Theus can reach Miller, while getting something out of Bibby and Artest before they're traded and/or their salaries expire.

"I think our team underachieved last year," Petrie said, "and one thing that is very important right now is getting back to playing an entertaining style of basketball, where the players look like they're having fun playing together."

Meantime, he must regain his magical touch and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past two seasons, namely the signings of Abdur-Rahim (2005) and Salmons (2006) to the midlevel exception, unduly burdening the team payroll. But more than anything, what the Kings need now -- what Petrie needs to bring to the table within the next several weeks -- is a blueprint that offers a clear, concise sense of direction.

Which way are the Kings going? Down a few more notches while preparing for a big strike in '09? Or effectively tinkering along the way, without jeopardizing their next potential great (salary cap) escape?

And who knows? Maybe Petrie will get lucky over there in Vegas. The New York Knicks, having acquired Zach Randolph last week, reportedly envision Artest as the missing piece. If so, Petrie should hold out for the immensely popular (and young) David Lee and considerably more. The Cleveland Cavaliers and Los Angeles Clippers are weak at point guard, and the Cavs, in particular, are said to remain intrigued by Bibby. If so, any swap should include the high-energy (and currently unsigned) Anderson Varejao. Hedo Turkoglu is available, though not nearly as desirable as the more physical Lee.

"If something comes along," Petrie said, "you have to be ready to act. But I don't see how you can go on forever, adding salaries, $5 (million) and $6 million at a crack, and never have one major leg at improving your team."

Agreed.

And please. No more slugs.

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com
 
"I think our team underachieved last year," Petrie said, "and one thing that is very important right now is getting back to playing an entertaining style of basketball, where the players look like they're having fun playing together."

I just hope Petrie CAN get a group of guys together that will entertain the fans.
 
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/259317.html

"If something comes along," Petrie said, "you have to be ready to act. But I don't see how you can go on forever, adding salaries, $5 (million) and $6 million at a crack, and never have one major leg at improving your team."

avoisin@sacbee.com

Well Brick, that answers your question of whether Geoff was smarter than McHale. if you add a MLE every year, pretty much all you are left with is middle level crap...
 
No varejao please. I don't mind David Lee but after seeing andy play in the finals I'm rather turned off. I somehow feel that he's going to hold himself in higher regard than Martin or Garcia. Which essentially will screw up how the team is supposed to be run. But that's just my opinion of course.
 
Because he says he believes the Kings already have a few of the building blocks, foremost among them Kevin Martin, the emerging Francisco García, the potential of rookie Spencer Hawes, Quincy Douby and Justin Williams. That goes along with the possibility -- and this is a stretch here -- that new coach Reggie Theus can reach Miller, while getting something out of Bibby and Artest before they're traded and/or their salaries expire.

"I think our team underachieved last year," Petrie said, "and one thing that is very important right now is getting back to playing an entertaining style of basketball, where the players look like they're having fun playing together."

I liked these parts the best. Even if we totally suck next year, if they play with energy, it could still be very fun to watch. And it will be good watching these particular players develop.

Also, I hope that Petrie's qualifying offer to Williams was enough to make him want to be here and get him locked up for the next 2 years or so.
 
Another day, another story about nothing. I honestly think that the sports writers at the Bee may actually be more bored than the posters on this message board.
 
And he prefers the term "refurbish" to "rebuild" because ... ?

Because he says he believes the Kings already have a few of the building blocks, foremost among them Kevin Martin, the emerging Francisco García, the potential of rookie Spencer Hawes, Quincy Douby and Justin Williams. That goes along with the possibility -- and this is a stretch here -- that new coach Reggie Theus can reach Miller, while getting something out of Bibby and Artest before they're traded and/or their salaries expire.

A disturbing trend: Recent stories have not mentioned Ronnie Price, including the above. Are the Kings going to cheap-out on Price? He's athletic, he's exciting, he's productive when he plays extended minutes. He's a fan favorite. Hope he's around this coming season.

And, I'm hoping Varejao was a misprint. I saw enough of his "talent" during the playoffs. :eek:
 
Actually these have been some of the most reassuring stories to appear in print about nthe Kings in several years. But talk is cheap of course.
 
I'm not sure the signings of SAR and Salmons are big mistakes as suggested here by Voisin. I realize and agree that when rebuilding, it's foolish to sign decent vets to MLE contracts, but at this point, their production has played to their contracts. Sure SAR dropped off this past year, but he's still tradeable. Same for Salmons, in my opinion.

When they were signed, we were still shooting for championships and now that we're not, we still can probably trade them if we choose to.
 
I'm not sure the signings of SAR and Salmons are big mistakes as suggested here by Voisin. I realize and agree that when rebuilding, it's foolish to sign decent vets to MLE contracts, but at this point, their production has played to their contracts. Sure SAR dropped off this past year, but he's still tradeable. Same for Salmons, in my opinion.

When they were signed, we were still shooting for championships and now that we're not, we still can probably trade them if we choose to.


Also we weren't "refurbishing" at the time of signing Salmons/SAR...they are still good players, but they were moves to help keep us competitive. There was every reason to believe last summer that we'd be a top 5 team in the West with the way we finished the season after Artest joined the club. We severely underachieved last season, and the common denominator in the under achievement is Mussleman.
 
Another day, another story about nothing. I honestly think that the sports writers at the Bee may actually be more bored than the posters on this message board.

Are we reading the same stuff?

Sorry, but I agree with Brick on this. Having read the Bee for years, I think these recent articles are pretty informative, especially when you're dealing with the elusive Petrie. Voisin actually got him to say stuff that didn't include pointing at the moon or hens laying eggs, etc.

Petrie is talking on the record and I, for one, am more interested in that than another recycled story about Artest and the Knicks, for example.
 
Are we reading the same stuff?

Sorry, but I agree with Brick on this. Having read the Bee for years, I think these recent articles are pretty informative, especially when you're dealing with the elusive Petrie. Voisin actually got him to say stuff that didn't include pointing at the moon or hens laying eggs, etc.

Petrie is talking on the record and I, for one, am more interested in that than another recycled story about Artest and the Knicks, for example.

It's actually quite humorous to see/hear how Petrie handles the media. He's pretty funny.
 
Looks to me like GP said the Kings are looking to make some changes. He prefers the new players and their contracts are good for the future of the Kings. Is that news worthy?

If it news worthy, Sactown seriously needs to consider getting MLB here so that fans and the media have something else to discuss.
 
I was listening to the Grant and Mike show last night and Grant said he thinks Petrie will make a couple of trades this month. And that's all that was said about it.
 
I'm glad that Geoff seems to be getting over his fondness for MLE bandaids, particularly considering that the FA market has been in the doldrums for some time. We do NOT need another Salmons added to the roster.

Because he says he believes the Kings already have a few of the building blocks, foremost among them Kevin Martin, the emerging Francisco García, the potential of rookie Spencer Hawes, Quincy Douby and Justin Williams.

I do agree that it's kind of worrisome that Douby is mentioned as a rebuild piece but Ronnie isn't. I was happy with how he played, once he finally got fairly regular minutes, and felt like he earned his entire, paltry paycheck by providing the Kings' most memorable highlight of the year. Douby, on the other hand, accomplished virtually nothing, he is still just a project which may or may not pay off.

Hopefully that's more AV than GP talking.

That goes along with the possibility -- and this is a stretch here -- that new coach Reggie Theus can reach Miller, while getting something out of Bibby and Artest before they're traded and/or their salaries expire.

The above seems to point toward the idea that we can't get good value for anyone until Theus has had a chance to coax better performance out of them for a while. There might be some truth to that, but I doubt that there are too many of us left who want to see Geoff sit on his hands and think about things for another 6 months. But it's the press, so who knows how much of that sentence is the news, and how much it's the journalist?
 
I like the fact that GP spoke of seeing all the talent coming in the summer league. That means he is definatley looking toward the youngsters that maybe throwins now for a trade but, could turn into assets.
 
A disturbing trend: Recent stories have not mentioned Ronnie Price, including the above. Are the Kings going to cheap-out on Price? He's athletic, he's exciting, he's productive when he plays extended minutes. He's a fan favorite. Hope he's around this coming season.

That's whats been bothering me as well. I'm hoping the Kings keep Ronnie or Ronnie stays. I want this guy to stay on our team.
 
A disturbing trend: Recent stories have not mentioned Ronnie Price, including the above. Are the Kings going to cheap-out on Price? He's athletic, he's exciting, he's productive when he plays extended minutes. He's a fan favorite. Hope he's around this coming season.
The Kings extended a qualifying offer to Price the same time as JW. So they can match other offers. At the same time, if someone else offers him a lot, I suspect GP doesn't want to overpay just to keep him.
 
I do agree that it's kind of worrisome that Douby is mentioned as a rebuild piece but Ronnie isn't. I was happy with how he played, once he finally got fairly regular minutes and felt like he earned his entire, paltry paycheck by providing the Kings' most memorable highlight of the year. Douby, on the other hand, accomplished virtually nothing, he is still just a project which may or may not pay off.

Wait, so you praise Price for one highlight dunk and improving when he got more minutes, but bash Douby for accomplishing nothing when he barely got any minutes? I don't know whether Douby will end up a better pro than Price, but you are using a double standard as your evidence.

Also, another reason for Petrie to mention Douby and not Price, is that Douby is actually under contract with the team for the near future. Price may or may not return, and why include someone in your statement of who your rebuilding around when there is a chance he might end up elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Wait, so you praise Price for one highlight dunk and improving when he got more minutes, but bash Douby for accomplishing nothing when he barely got any minutes? I don't know whether Douby will end up a better pro than Price, but you are using a double standard as your evidence.

I'm using exactly one standard: how tested a player is at filling a team need. Ronnie has shown that he can be a good sparkplug, and even did a passable job as a PG a couple of times, late in the season. Douby may have a lot of potential, but he hasn't had enough PT to convince anyone one way or the other. I'm not bashing Douby, I'm just saying that a perfectly acceptable bird in the hand shouldn't be hastily tossed aside for whatever it is that's behind Door #3.
 
Yeah I tried to focus on Cisco and Justin and not think about the opponent. They did well in other games also. This was just one that they both did REALLY well in. Also Brad had 3-dub in that game.
 
Back
Top