Voisin: Petrie, Maloofs have worst fears realized

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/351/story/133257.html

Ailene Voisin: Petrie, Maloofs have their worst fears realized
By Ailene Voisin -
Last Updated 3:05 am PST Tuesday, March 6, 2007


Geoff Petrie and the Maloofs responded decisively and appropriately. They were neither enablers nor executioners. They uttered neither excuse nor indictment. They sent Ron Artest home for the immediate future, delivered a powerful message to the community, and then went in pursuit of further details and -- one has to assume -- justice for all.

Artest. His wife. His teammates. His fans. His community. His league. Victims of domestic violence everywhere.

"We are concerned about Ron, but we're also concerned about the image of the team and the reputation of the people involved," a weary Petrie said, explaining Artest's indefinite ban.

Was the Kings' basketball president angry? Of course.

Was he surprised? Of course not.

Why would he be surprised? The ticking had quieted, but never completely ceased. While Kings officials often referred to Artest as "high maintenance" in the 14 months since he was obtained from the Indiana Pacers, until the past several weeks, there were none of his previous on-court issues to report. The eighth-year veteran had even seemingly morphed into the average pampered NBA player -- inclined to complain about his coach, his touches and his teammates, along with the usual assortment of injuries and ailments.

If anything, Artest, whose NBA rap sheet includes a 73-game suspension that helped precipitate his trade for Peja Stojakovic, exceeded virtually everyone's expectations. For the most part, he not only comported himself like a professional, resisting opponents' nightly efforts to incite one of those familiar outbursts, he introduced Sacramento fans to defensive intensity, propelled the once-slumping 2005-06 Kings into the playoffs, and the past several weeks was healthy again and playing his best basketball of the season.

"I've said this to a lot of people," Petrie noted. "There have been no physical confrontations in practice. He has not been destructive. He has not destroyed anything in here, like thrown a TV, or anything that might indicate he was on the verge of going off."

Nonetheless, Kings officials have been uneasy since January, when one of Artest's dogs was rescued by Placer County officials. Suddenly, the small forward's domestic front -- an issue early in his career -- became of greater concern than his influence in an unsettled locker room. The anxiety was only heightened when Artest skipped a Feb. 25 game at Indiana, citing "family issues."

Did he in fact commit the crime, abuse his wife and prevent her from calling 911?

Professional athletes should be afforded the same protections as every other citizen. Innocent until proven guilty. Let the courts decide.

Yet by "excusing" Artest indefinitely -- a course of action that, in contrast to a suspension, probably precludes an immediate appeal by the National Basketball Players Association -- Petrie and the Maloofs responded to the severity of the matter and the sensitivity of the issue. Perhaps they were tacitly acknowledging the organization's ongoing relationship with WEAVE, the primary provider of domestic violence and sexual assault services in Sacramento County.

Petrie's wife, Anne-Marie, organized a fund-raiser for the nonprofit agency two years ago and remains a member of its board. And lest anyone forget, the family empire is presided over by matriarch Colleen Maloof. Indeed, the female voice resonates over at Arco.

So there are no winners here. This isn't a game. This is life. According to WEAVE executive director Beth Hassett, the California Attorney General's office receives 500 calls daily on domestic violence-related incidents. The Department of Justice estimates that 50 women are victimized hourly by a partner. And the children? What about all those pint-sized Kings fans who are subjected to terrifying episodes of abuse?

"If there is domestic violence in the home," Hassett said, "there is a 50 percent chance the kids are being abused as well. The stats on the number of kids who witness abuse is astounding."

Offered Petrie, cautioning against a rush to judgment, "I can't speculate. The official facts will come out. We'll have more to say as we go along."

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@sacbee.com.
 
I have to commend Voisin. I think she and the other Bee writers are showing almost admirable restraint in this situation. This article and the one by Kreidler are doing a good job of putting the facts out there without trying Artest in the media. I wish I could say the same for at least one local TV station which has gone so far as to take a comment by Bibby this morning ("Well, at least you guys have something to report today" - directed at the hordes of cameras, etc. outside the practice facility) as an indication of the "obvious conflict" between Bibby and Artest...
 
Way to put words in Petries mouth! This article takes what little Petrie said and completely runs out of control with it. "Was he surprised? Of course not!" Uh, Ok. :confused:
 
Way to put words in Petries mouth! This article takes what little Petrie said and completely runs out of control with it. "Was he surprised? Of course not!" Uh, Ok. :confused:

You think Petrie was "surprised" to find out something had happened in Ron's personal life apparently because of his anger issues? Really?

Let's be realistic. Geoff Petrie and the Maloofs knew they were bringing a loose cannon to the Kings. They've been waiting for something to happen and keeping their fingers crossed that it wouldn't. To say they're "surprised" would just be silly. If anything, I think "disappointed" might be the only term you could use to accurately describe what must have been their first reactions.

They gambled...and they might just have lost.
 
There was a very irritating sidebar to this unfortunate happening on yesterdays ESPN NBA radio. Bill "Mouth" Walton in the 1-3pm segment says to the effect that "The NBAPA will likely step in because their view is he shouldn't be suspended (he was "excused") as he isn't injured and can still play." Words not exact but that was the gist of what he said. Wow. He worded it in the 3rd person but none-the-less brought it up. He doesn't have a clue!!! Not that he ever did. And no sensitivity. :(

RonRon was arrested because of what he did and no one is denying it. He went to jail. He is innocent until proven guilty. Provocations don't matter, actions do. (saying that, I wonder why his wife didn't get a battery charge from chasing him in the Hummer and banging up his windshield with a frying pan!!!???). But HE WENT TO JAIL!! He broke the law. Worse it was Domestic Violence law. Petrie/Maloofs did the right thing.
 
There was a very irritating sidebar to this unfortunate happening on yesterdays ESPN NBA radio. Bill "Mouth" Walton in the 1-3pm segment says to the effect that "The NBAPA will likely step in because their view is he shouldn't be suspended (he was "excused") as he isn't injured and can still play." Words not exact but that was the gist of what he said. Wow. He worded it in the 3rd person but none-the-less brought it up. He doesn't have a clue!!! Not that he ever did. And no sensitivity. :(

RonRon was arrested because of what he did and no one is denying it. He went to jail. He is innocent until proven guilty. Provocations don't matter, actions do. (saying that, I wonder why his wife didn't get a battery charge from chasing him in the Hummer and banging up his windshield with a frying pan!!!???). But HE WENT TO JAIL!! He broke the law. Worse it was Domestic Violence law. Petrie/Maloofs did the right thing.

Point well taken. Outstanding post. Thank you
 
There was a very irritating sidebar to this unfortunate happening on yesterdays ESPN NBA radio. Bill "Mouth" Walton in the 1-3pm segment says to the effect that "The NBAPA will likely step in because their view is he shouldn't be suspended (he was "excused") as he isn't injured and can still play." Words not exact but that was the gist of what he said. Wow. He worded it in the 3rd person but none-the-less brought it up. He doesn't have a clue!!! Not that he ever did. And no sensitivity. :(

RonRon was arrested because of what he did and no one is denying it. He went to jail. He is innocent until proven guilty. Provocations don't matter, actions do. (saying that, I wonder why his wife didn't get a battery charge from chasing him in the Hummer and banging up his windshield with a frying pan!!!???). But HE WENT TO JAIL!! He broke the law. Worse it was Domestic Violence law. Petrie/Maloofs did the right thing.

But what Bill Walton said is true. And it's in the interest of the players association to fight for all of their players equally on the basis of the collective bargaining agreement. It's not a matter of sensitivity, it's a matter of legal right and wrong. Artest has not violated any agreement that prevents him from being able to play.

Also, I should remind you, breaking the law and going to jail are two different things. He's not guilty of anything yet. And anyway, assuming that Artest is guilty and this is a repeat offense, I think that warrants counseling more than it warrants jail time. People are so quick to dismiss him as "crazy" and irreperable. If 99% of the time he's perfectly fine, but that other 1% he has a problem controlling himself -- we should ban him from basketball and lock him away? Even if it's 5%, that seems totally overboard. Where's all your sensitivity there?

The only thing this incident proves to me is that Artest has always been guilty in people's minds, they were just waiting for something to happen to prove it. People may say he has a clean slate, but they never really meant it. It's just politeness. It's just appeasement. I believe in forgive and FORGET. That's true forgiveness. Not "we forgive you, but if you do it again that's the last straw".
 
But what Bill Walton said is true. And it's in the interest of the players association to fight for all of their players equally on the basis of the collective bargaining agreement. It's not a matter of sensitivity, it's a matter of legal right and wrong.

I have a hard time imagining the players association having a big problem with this since the Kings are still paying him. If they do, it won't come to much.

The Pacer's suspended him for a couple of minths just for the comments he made to the press about the coach and wanting to be traded. They were still paying him too so I don't think there can be much of a problem. Any team can stop playing any player they want as long as they are still honoring the contract financially.
 
The only thing this incident proves to me is that Artest has always been guilty in people's minds, they were just waiting for something to happen to prove it. People may say he has a clean slate, but they never really meant it. It's just politeness. It's just appeasement. I believe in forgive and FORGET. That's true forgiveness. Not "we forgive you, but if you do it again that's the last straw".

This is not a forum for debating philosophy. It's obvious you feel very strongly about your philosophy of life, which is fine. But please do not take this discussion into an argument of how you're right and others on this board are wrong. That path is fraught with danger and we just don't go there...

Thanks.
 
And anyway, assuming that Artest is guilty and this is a repeat offense, I think that warrants counseling more than it warrants jail time.
The Sheriff's Department referred the couple to counseling after one of the earlier calls to 911. You do know that Artest has been in counseling and on drugs for anger management issues since he was 10, don't you?

He's been given second, third, fourth, etc. "chances." His (and his wife's) behaviors affect his family, his neighbors, his bosses, his co-workers and others. I have forgiven a lot of people in my life for some very bad things, but it is not very smart to forgive over and over, but then let the person do the same things to you again and again.
 
You think Petrie was "surprised" to find out something had happened in Ron's personal life apparently because of his anger issues? Really?

Let's be realistic. Geoff Petrie and the Maloofs knew they were bringing a loose cannon to the Kings. They've been waiting for something to happen and keeping their fingers crossed that it wouldn't. To say they're "surprised" would just be silly. If anything, I think "disappointed" might be the only term you could use to accurately describe what must have been their first reactions.

They gambled...and they might just have lost.


Doesn't matter. He didn't come out in the paper and say he was so it's irrelevant. My point was she put a spin on the article that I am pretty sure Geoff Petrie wouldn't have been happy about. She alluded to things Petrie clearly never even mentioned. And if he didn't then right or wrong she pulled it out of her butt and put it on the front page.
 
i don't see how it would be against the rules for the org. not to play someone. is there a stipulation in his contract that says he has to play?
 
Back
Top