Vivek wants to play 4 on 5 on D


Ah it's our old friend Barry Petchesky.

his article yesterday.

I don't care that any halfway competent team would carve up a four-man zone, and probably beat these Kings by 80. (This defense would probably be effective against the Kings, who don't have more than a couple players worth guarding anyway.) I don't care that you'd probably have DeMarcus Cousins and Rudy Gay get into a fistfight over who got to hang out under the opponent's basket.
 
From that deadspin article (http://deadspin.com/5962514/d-iii-p...m-record-and-shouldnt-be-celebrated-by-anyone), here's how it would work. And it does work to set records. If you're playing a church league team.

""The strategy was to use a full court press after a made basket, with the caveat that [the player seeking the record] would not cross into the defensive side of the court. So, after our opponents broke our press, we were essentially playing four-on-five, which enabled the other team to take quicker shots and fall into our game plan.

"The rationale is to essentially trade off a quick two or more attempts at lower probability 3-point shots. Given the high pace required for the system, Grinnell shifts in five players every 30 to 45 seconds. Within each shift there is a primary shooter who will take the bulk of threes (or shots) during the shift."
 
From that deadspin article (http://deadspin.com/5962514/d-iii-p...m-record-and-shouldnt-be-celebrated-by-anyone), here's how it would work. And it does work to set records. If you're playing a church league team.

""The strategy was to use a full court press after a made basket, with the caveat that [the player seeking the record] would not cross into the defensive side of the court. So, after our opponents broke our press, we were essentially playing four-on-five, which enabled the other team to take quicker shots and fall into our game plan.

"The rationale is to essentially trade off a quick two or more attempts at lower probability 3-point shots. Given the high pace required for the system, Grinnell shifts in five players every 30 to 45 seconds. Within each shift there is a primary shooter who will take the bulk of threes (or shots) during the shift."

This is why Vivek's shtick makes me nervous. If he was just an over eager owner spouting out ideas, you could look past it. But with the hiring of this coach and some of the strategy behind moves we've made, I get the feeling it's going beyond statement into action.
 
This is why Vivek's shtick makes me nervous. If he was just an over eager owner spouting out ideas, you could look past it. But with the hiring of this coach and some of the strategy behind moves we've made, I get the feeling it's going beyond statement into action.
It's more than just talk. He's putting it into action. I don't know what they'll actually do in Reno, but all of this just makes me nervous too. Let's just give the ball to Boogie and get out of the way. It's not creative, but it's tried and true.
 
i thought it was gerbil looking for offensive players but its really vivek owner/gm

v - owner/gm
mully - assistant gm
gerbil - puppet gm
 
Hockey goal is 72 inches wide and 48 inches tall. No ammunition will cover that, if your goalie is standing up. Or lying down. And you seriously underestimate skill level of hockey players: openly made wrist shots are relatively easy catch for good athletes, but your sumo wrestler has infinite reaction time, so it's just a question of finding little holes in a wall, and most guys can show such precision.

72245468.jpg
:p
 
There's a reason why it's always tiny college programs try these junk ball ideas. It's because they know they can't win playing a traditional game. They have no shot playing straight up so let's try something crazy. No offense to them for trying to find a way to win but it's loser ball.

And you can get kids who only got one scholarship offer or who are walk-ons to buy into that sort of thing but you'd never get even a three star prospect to sign with you and agree to that style. Let alone NBA players who are always cognizant of their stats and the perception of their play because it pertains to their next contract and possibly endorsements.

Vivek can think these things all he wants but they shouldn't be made public or getting free agents to sign in Sacramento will go from hard to nearly impossible.
 
I am reminded of the Paul Westhead Denver Nuggets of the early 90s.

I am frightened. I would literally not watch that crap. It was an embarrassment.
 
I am reminded of the Paul Westhead Denver Nuggets of the early 90s.

I am frightened. I would literally not watch that crap. It was an embarrassment.

Paul was running an aggressive 7 seconds or less system with inferior talent. Hoping Orlando Woolridge could serve as LMU's Hank Gathers was a bad idea, but it was still basketball.

What Grinell does and what Vivek is talking about is a circus. In the video clip posted above, the players talk about having to unlearn fundamental basketball to run the system.
 
I am reminded of the Paul Westhead Denver Nuggets of the early 90s.

I am frightened. I would literally not watch that crap. It was an embarrassment.

That's what makes me worried that he doesn't know the game. Those teams have not only never won but they also didn't get a boost in watchability or popularity and most abandon the junk in a season or 2.

Bottom line, Vivek needs to step away from basketball ops so that we can finally start to put together something that resembles an nba system on both sides of the court.
 
Again, whatever until we actually see anything resembling this "plan" with the big league club.

As far as the D-league team goes, they can run around with shoes on their head as a new strategy if they want. I'm not going to worry about it until there's actually something to be worried about.
 
Again, whatever until we actually see anything resembling this "plan" with the big league club.

As far as the D-league team goes, they can run around with shoes on their head as a new strategy if they want. I'm not going to worry about it until there's actually something to be worried about.

What would "something to be worried about" look like to you?

Turning the dleague team we were excited about controlling last year into a freak show, which essentially renders it useless as a development tool.

Talking non stop about nba 3.0 and positionless basketball that doesn't seen to have any current implications for our team.

A total dismissal of defensive focus.

A complete turnover of the roster with pieces that still fail to compliment each other or even fit the system they preach.

A coach and FO that appear to have very different philosophies.

An owner that appears to be overly involved, at least as a major voice in basketball operations.

The sky isn't falling but it sure as poop looks like it's hanging on by a thin thread.
 
It works perfectly well if DeMarcus Cousins is also in the game, which he could be since the two would never have to share the same side of the court.

IN fact the ONLY bizarre land where it has some sort of out of the box chance to work consistently is when you have a 7'5" 350lb center. Because if he lingers back by the opposing hoop he is completely unguardable. You can throw balls to him that nobody else can catch. And if they don't catch them and he gets it, nobody back that fast has any shot to alter Sim's shot. Every single ball you throw to him accurately is basically a 100% layup opportunity from point blank range, and no PG or SG hustling back has any chance to do anything about it. Its the only basketball neophyte way to make the numbers work out. Any smaller player down there can be defended, can miss his shots with guards flying at him. Its also the only reasonable way such an idea would have ever been come up with. Vivek may be woefully new to the game, but painting him as an idiot who would randomly suggest such a bizarre strategy for basketball players perfectly capable of playing both ends is a bit much. On the other hand, it makes perfect cracked sense to suggest it to support a unique player who we just so happen to have picked up and carried through the summer and who was traveling with Vivek to New York for Indian cultural activities etc. It makes sense as a wild response to a specific problem posed: how do you make Sim Bhullar into an actual NBA player? Makes much less sense as a random muse "how do we do something unnecessary and stupid today?"

To be fair I've had a similar random muse about ice hockey, which is a sport I have low tolerance of mostly because of its juvenile machismo. But my ice hockey brainstorm was this: look at that little tiny net. The only way to score is to put the puck in that little tiny net. Well... what if then you built a wall in front of that net? As in a human wall? You get a big ass sumo wrestler -- my initial idea was that 800 lb American sumo -- you get him some reinforced skates and teach him just enough skating to skate in a straight line from the bench to the goal. And then you have him skate straight out there, and plop, sit right down on his giant 800lb ass in front of that little tiny net. In full 800lb man hockey goalie pads, I seriously think he could block the entire goal. You physically could not score. It seems like genius to me. For some reason my hockey loving friends/brothers do not seem to think so, but I think they are just in denial and don't want to see the sport they love destroyed/perverted by such a brilliant gimmick. Now however, if I bought the Islanders tomorrow would I suggest my gimmick to my GM? Everybody shake their head no. I know an amusing theoretical muse from an actual tactic when I see one.

This cherry picking thing is the same way. Not only would it be despised as all cherry picking is, but it would ruin the flow/entertainment of the game and be outlawed if it actually started to work well enough to be used routinely. Hence, amusing theoretical muse, nothing more.
Hockey goalies are often the most talented skaters on the team. If you find one person physically capable of blocking the entire net that might be interesting but odds are they'd leave one or two areas exposed and they'd also be a nightmare on skates, not to mention all the flexibility and reaction time required. There are rules about what kind of pads goalies wear as well so basically you'd be asking this person to just get the crap smashed out of them with a puck as well, since they almost certainly would not have the skill to make actual saves. Those things do break bones.

Also, while not the same thing, there have been a number of jumbo goalies in the NHL and they usually are much worse than their smaller brothers. The best goalie of the modern era was 5'10 165.
 
anybody see NO's first game? their front court is beasting. new orleans did the right thing after trading lopez and got asik in the offseason. they look like a legit squad now.
 
anybody see NO's first game? their front court is beasting. new orleans did the right thing after trading lopez and got asik in the offseason. they look like a legit squad now.

This literally has nothing to do with Vivek wanting to play 4 on 5.
 
Or so says... yep, Zach Lowe. He also the predicts the Kings to very bad.

...The Kings aren’t actually going to do that, but their D-League might,..

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/n...rs-oklahoma-city-thunder-cleveland-cavaliers/

Amazing to me how people latched on to the vaguest of rumors and yet neglected the very next sentence. This whole thread is full of an inordinate amount of hand-wringing, especially for Oct. You guys need to pace yourselves. We've got a long way to go...

And, as an aside, the new head coach for the D-League isn't his father. To visit the "sins of the father" on the son is IMHO not really fair. But again, maybe I'm just silly in wanting to actually see something happen before I start lamenting it.
 
Amazing to me how people latched on to the vaguest of rumors and yet neglected the very next sentence. This whole thread is full of an inordinate amount of hand-wringing, especially for Oct. You guys need to pace yourselves. We've got a long way to go...

And, as an aside, the new head coach for the D-League isn't his father. To visit the "sins of the father" on the son is IMHO not really fair. But again, maybe I'm just silly in wanting to actually see something happen before I start lamenting it.

The question would be why else would you ever hire such a wildly underqualified "coach" than just in hoping he will emulate his father. Our last coach up there was Eric Musselman, a former NBA head coach. Now our next one is the son of a Div III freak coach? Somehow I doubt that was the best resume we looked at, so he must have had other attractions. Such as a willingness to turn our D-league franchise into an experimental circus. Hard to imagine Musselman being that pliable.
 
Amazing to me how people latched on to the vaguest of rumors and yet neglected the very next sentence. This whole thread is full of an inordinate amount of hand-wringing, especially for Oct. You guys need to pace yourselves. We've got a long way to go...

And, as an aside, the new head coach for the D-League isn't his father. To visit the "sins of the father" on the son is IMHO not really fair. But again, maybe I'm just silly in wanting to actually see something happen before I start lamenting it.

His dad doesn't even always sit on the bench during games so his son is actually the one who has been coaching this way the last couple years.
 
The question would be why else would you ever hire such a wildly underqualified "coach" than just in hoping he will emulate his father. Our last coach up there was Eric Musselman, a former NBA head coach. Now our next one is the son of a Div III freak coach? Somehow I doubt that was the best resume we looked at, so he must have had other attractions. Such as a willingness to turn our D-league franchise into an experimental circus. Hard to imagine Musselman being that pliable.

I'm just gonna stick with my plan and wait until he actually coaches a game or two before leaping to certain conclusions. I can actually recall a time when people didn't post so many anticipatory negatives. I personally am going to enjoy each moment and only panic when something actually occurs. (Yes, the VF21 purple glasses POV).

GO KINGS!
 
I hope Vivek has 0 say in what happens with our roster, coaching, and everything else. He shouldn't even have a say in who the GM should draft. I remember years ago when the GSW traded Ellis to the Bucks. Ellis' wife was good friends with the owner's wife. The owner's wife got upset at her husband, but her husband wasn't the one who controlled the trade.

I'd like to see the same thing happen here. Vivek can be as close to Bhullar as he want, but he shouldn't be anywhere near the Kings right now. If you really think about it, it seems like he's trying to make Bhullar's overweight, under achieving, unmotivated, and lazy self relevant for the NBA.

I hope Vivek becomes nothing like Jerry Jones. I love Vivek as a owner, but not as a basketball personnel..
 
I'm absolutely not kidding when I say this was about Sim Bhullar BTW. And the hope would be that this was Vivek's random muse about how to make that happen, a quickly dismissed suggestion.

1) Vivek wants a 7'5" guy of Indian descent to make the team.

2) The coaches/PDA say well, he's got skills but the problem is he can't change ends.

3) Vivek brainstorms and says, what if we just played 4 on 5 on defense, and had Sim stay down on the offensive side of the ball cherrypicking? He's 7'5", he's got good hands, nobody could move him once he set up. You get a rebound you gun the ball fullcourt to him under the hoop for a lay in. A shot is made you take the ball out on the baseline and gun the ball fullcourt to Sim for a lay in. Even if you can't gun it full court he'll have automatic perfect post position every possession.

4) eyes roll

5) Sim released, presumably to be picked up in Reno, whose coach will soon receive a phone call from Vivek. "So I was thinking..."

Grant just confirmed on the radio this was the exact thinking from the horses mouth.
 
Grant just confirmed on the radio this was the exact thinking from the horses mouth.

Ooooohhhhh - Grant being all up in it and acting tough on his radio show, calling out the new owner. Somehow the fact that Grant confirmed anything doesn't help its credence IMHO. Remember who we're talking about here.
 
Back
Top