It works perfectly well if DeMarcus Cousins is also in the game, which he could be since the two would never have to share the same side of the court.
IN fact the ONLY bizarre land where it has some sort of out of the box chance to work consistently is when you have a 7'5" 350lb center. Because if he lingers back by the opposing hoop he is completely unguardable. You can throw balls to him that nobody else can catch. And if they don't catch them and he gets it, nobody back that fast has any shot to alter Sim's shot. Every single ball you throw to him accurately is basically a 100% layup opportunity from point blank range, and no PG or SG hustling back has any chance to do anything about it. Its the only basketball neophyte way to make the numbers work out. Any smaller player down there can be defended, can miss his shots with guards flying at him. Its also the only reasonable way such an idea would have ever been come up with. Vivek may be woefully new to the game, but painting him as an idiot who would randomly suggest such a bizarre strategy for basketball players perfectly capable of playing both ends is a bit much. On the other hand, it makes perfect cracked sense to suggest it to support a unique player who we just so happen to have picked up and carried through the summer and who was traveling with Vivek to New York for Indian cultural activities etc. It makes sense as a wild response to a specific problem posed: how do you make Sim Bhullar into an actual NBA player? Makes much less sense as a random muse "how do we do something unnecessary and stupid today?"
To be fair I've had a similar random muse about ice hockey, which is a sport I have low tolerance of mostly because of its juvenile machismo. But my ice hockey brainstorm was this: look at that little tiny net. The only way to score is to put the puck in that little tiny net. Well... what if then you built a wall in front of that net? As in a human wall? You get a big ass sumo wrestler -- my initial idea was that 800 lb American sumo -- you get him some reinforced skates and teach him just enough skating to skate in a straight line from the bench to the goal. And then you have him skate straight out there, and plop, sit right down on his giant 800lb ass in front of that little tiny net. In full 800lb man hockey goalie pads, I seriously think he could block the entire goal. You physically could not score. It seems like genius to me. For some reason my hockey loving friends/brothers do not seem to think so, but I think they are just in denial and don't want to see the sport they love destroyed/perverted by such a brilliant gimmick. Now however, if I bought the Islanders tomorrow would I suggest my gimmick to my GM? Everybody shake their head no. I know an amusing theoretical muse from an actual tactic when I see one.
This cherry picking thing is the same way. Not only would it be despised as all cherry picking is, but it would ruin the flow/entertainment of the game and be outlawed if it actually started to work well enough to be used routinely. Hence, amusing theoretical muse, nothing more.