Indeed. For those who watched the game, Haliburton was more or less a non-factor through the first three quarters, and by the time he showed up in the fourth, the game was already out of reach. The passivity is what remains perplexing to me, and it's why I continually put Hali in the same category of star as Sabonis and Fox.
Ultimately, I keep taking the "hold your horses" approach to evaluating Tyrese because I don't trust him yet as the centerpiece of a contender. He's hit some big shots in these playoffs, so the narrative that's coalescing around him is "He's got next!". But from an overall impact standpoint, I'm not yet seeing it. I mean, he's a really good player, and often very fun to watch. He's got All-NBA talent that's at least on par with Domas. But like Domas, his impact gets dulled by his curious desire to defer and his not-exactly-infrequent disappearing act.
Sure, you can "build around" Tyrese easily enough, but when we're talking about the "upper echelon" of the NBA, we're talking about guys you can count on to carry the day when you need them to do so, guys that are worth their enormous share of a franchise's salary cap. Jokic is that guy. Doncic is that guy. Giannis is that guy. And SGA is very clearly that guy. Is Tyrese? I'm certainly not ready to buy that stock, no matter how vindicated someone like JJ Redick may feel for his silly "malpractice" take.
I've said it before, but I'll happily eat crow if and when Hali proves my doubts foolish. He's only 25. He's got plenty of time. But does he have the temperament to go searching for the next gear that will make me regret the Kings traded him? We'll see. He could find it right here in these Finals, for all I know. I wouldn't rule it out. I just remain unconvinced that he's worth the level of smugly-coated snobbery I see from a lot of Kings fans right now.