- Status
It's a snowball effect with that cretin.. He was some lowlife covering the NBA beat over a decade ago when he saw his chance at sensationalism, writing that out-of-context Webber piece about his pending free agency which embarassed Sacramento.. After that the fanbase hated on him whenever he came to Arco, and therefore created a mutual disdain.. Obviously his dislike would surface on this pressing issue
You're being far too kind. What a clueless, whining little b***h. And he has the audacity to call Kings fans arrogant after all the [factually] incorrect nonsense he's thrown about. It's no wonder he's a laughing stock. Completely humiliated that he was called out by KF for reporting pretty much everything wrong, and still won't acknowledge his pee-poor reporting. Instead resorts to a major whingefest that exposes him for the absolute douche that he is. Not going to waste anymore time on that worthless lowlife.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave 4m
Hey @RicBucher. I'm on hold. Dave in Sacramento. Take the call big boy.
This could get interesting. I'm pretty sure Bucher, being the little wimp that he is, wants no part of someone that actually knows what they're talking about. Hope Dave doesn't give up and persists until he gets him and gives him a verbal beatdown and education all in one.
Hey @RicBucher. I'm on hold. Dave in Sacramento. Take the call big boy.
This could get interesting. I'm pretty sure Bucher, being the little wimp that he is, wants no part of someone that actually knows what they're talking about. Hope Dave doesn't give up and persists until he gets him and gives him a verbal beatdown and education all in one.
I'm not a fan of Grant at all, in fact I usually dislike him, but he tore into Bucher on his radio show. Well done to him for calling him out. Here's the link for anyone who wants to hear: http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/?pod...link=true&config_file=config.xml&dcid=CBS.SAC
Stern said you'd have to ask them.
I'd advise that it doesn't matter simply because I think probably everyone in the room was on the same page about voting it down, but not having it be a unanimous decision, which may have created some blowback. Therefore, those who voted against were just performing a duty rather than voting their personal will. For this reason, no one who voted against should be viewed as anti Sacramento. There is ZERO reason to hold any kind of grudge here.
I'd advise that it doesn't matter simply because I think probably everyone in the room was on the same page about voting it down, but not having it be a unanimous decision, which may have created some blowback. Therefore, those who voted against were just performing a duty rather than voting their personal will. For this reason, no one who voted against should be viewed as anti Sacramento. There is ZERO reason to hold any kind of grudge here.
- Status