Tetsujin
The Game Thread Dude
If Blake Griffin was a rookie in his second season in the league, so was Harry, I guess.Sophomore season, technically? He didn't play his rookie season.
If Blake Griffin was a rookie in his second season in the league, so was Harry, I guess.Sophomore season, technically? He didn't play his rookie season.
He will NEVER average close to 15/10/5
The equine expired. Its bones lay there in the punishing glare of the sun, attacked by scavengers until there was nothing left but a few shards of glittering white calcium-like material. At that point, said material succumbed to the inevitable and turned to dust, blowing away into the great beyond.
Instead of continuing to try to beat the poor beast, why not revel in what we're seeing right now? An emergence of Harry Giles as a player to be reckoned with.
If you want to continue to blame Vlade, please use the thread devoted to his evisceration HERE
If you want to continue to whine about the failure of the Kings to pick up Giles' option, there's already a long thread about it HERE.
I legitimately believe HG will be mentioned in the tier one spot (quite a bit) below Jokic as a passing big man if everything goes right. I’m not backing down from my prediction.
No.
What is there to revel in? Think about the entire process of how this played out and it's like one bad joke. You walked right into this when you made the thread. Everything positive Giles does makes Vlade look worse; you're able to compartmentalize the two from each other but I don't and a lot of others don't either.
Unless everything breaks right, we're literally developing him for another team so he can contribute against us (which I admit I'd relish).
Bad metaphor; a dead horse implies this is irrelevant, which it isn't considering the guy who made the decision still in charge. It's more like a zombie horse.
You choose to ignore the context. If you cannot find a way to enjoy HG's emergence separate from the option decision (which is a dead horse, like it or not) that's on you. You can debate it to your heart's content in the Option thread. Believe it or not, however, there are actually some Kings fans for whom that is not their primary thought.
If Harry continues to put in 30+ min games without issues, I believe you’re right.I legitimately believe HG will be mentioned in the tier one spot (quite a bit) below Jokic as a passing big man if everything goes right. I’m not backing down from my prediction.
He's going to have to add a ton to his game that we haven't seen yet. Can't average 5+ assists a game by just standing at the elbow and hitting cutters. He's already elite at that but that one play only nets you 2-3 assists on average a game.
To date, for the month of February, Giles is averaging 17 points and 12 rebounds per 36 min. (And 5 PFs.)
“I think with time and reps I’m going to get better. I’m going to keep getting better."
https://www.sacbee.com/sports/nba/sacramento-kings/article240561591.html
Damn man you hate your team that much lol?No.
What is there to revel in? Think about the entire process of how this played out and it's like one bad joke. You walked right into this when you made the thread. Everything positive Giles does makes Vlade look worse; you're able to compartmentalize the two from each other but I don't and a lot of others don't either.
Unless everything breaks right, we're literally developing him for another team so he can contribute against us (which I admit I'd relish).
Bad metaphor; a dead horse implies this is irrelevant, which it isn't considering the guy who made the decision still in charge. It's more like a zombie horse.
I seem to remember that he was shooting the 3 at a reasonable clip in Stockton, but I could be totally off-base.I just want Harry to shoot the 18 footer more, and of course make it. Then I want him to extend to the 3 point line. Longer term, if he improves his shooting, he becomes a very good stretch 4, who also plays the 5 at times. I don't think he can suffer the wear and tear if he gets a lot of minutes at the 5. He just doesn't have that body build. I love his passion for the game and hope the Kings can work something out with him for the long term.
I seem to remember that he was shooting the 3 at a reasonable clip in Stockton, but I could be totally off-base.
He shot something stupid like 70% from three in three games in Stockton. Lol
He has the range, just not the confidence (?) consistency or very likely the green light yet.
He shot something stupid like 70% from three in three games in Stockton. Lol
He has the range, just not the confidence (?) consistency or very likely the green light yet.
I think there are many of us that appreciate candor like yours and who generally disagree with the manner in which the mods operate.Oh, I can't. And I will, unabashedly.
But this was all so predictable.
You start some fluffy thread about Giles. Someone brings up the whole option situation because of course they did, why wouldn't they? You come back, make some condescending post where you escalate the argument, filter everyone into the designated threads, and get the last word.
I think there are many of us that appreciate candor like yours and who generally disagree with the manner in which the mods operate.
Thank you for allowing civil dissent.Well, there may not be many, but there are at least a few.
But seeing as you like candor, here's some candor for you and those of like mind: You will not make headway by complaining about the moderation. We try to run a fairly tight ship here. We have numerous times in the past explained why. Your objection to the current moderation policies has been noted, for whatever that is worth (more candor: not much).
Additional candor: We recognize that there are other websites devoted to the Sacramento Kings whose moderation policies are less strict than those at KingsFans.com. We are not jealous. You are perfectly welcome to visit those websites and take advantage of their particular moderation policies, and this is true whether you continue to visit KingsFans.com or not.
Yet more candor: It is rude to be invited into someone's home and then proceed to complain about the furniture. KingsFans.com is a privately-owned website. You are a guest here. We would kindly appreciate you attempting to abide by our rules when you come visit. Thank you.
This is where analytics gets in the way of logic IMO. If Giles doesn't take that 18-foot shot, then teams sag off of him. This takes away his passing lanes which negates one of his biggest assets. Focusing on whether the shot is high percentage or not takes away the fact that the whole offense bogs down and becomes stagnet without it.I'm glad Harry isn't shooting 18 footers unless he has to. It's one of the worst shots in basketball and you don't want a guy who is just a so-so shooter shooting them. If he can extend his range out to the 3 point line then I'm all for that but I don't want a guy who already struggles with efficiency to be shooting inefficient shots on top of it.
This is where analytics gets in the way of logic IMO. If Giles doesn't take that 18-foot shot, then teams sag off of him. This takes away his passing lanes which negates one of his biggest assets. Focusing on whether the shot is high percentage or not takes away the fact that the whole offense bogs down and becomes stagnet without it.
Brad Miller was slow and ground bound. Harry is not.Henry Giles - Brad Miller 2.0?