Ahhhh! So, I could go and delete post #56 (just for grins) and throw everything off again?VF21 said:830 -
No, we actually weren't off. Someone posted a number, which received a post #. People posted after that and were, in fact, correct.
Then, the person who had posted the number in the post #793 slot deleted it. THAT threw all the subsequent posts off. I could have, in fact, repaired it, but if I did then all the posts made before the deletion would be correct again and the ones made after the deletion would be wrong.
![]()
Yes, just like I could delete post #1 and EVERYTHING would disappear...6th said:Ahhhh! So, I could go and delete post #56 (just for grins) and throw everything off again?![]()
![]()
Oh, do it...do it, and we could start over.VF21 said:Yes, just like I could delete post #1 and EVERYTHING would disappear...
832
I wouldn't mind closing this thread and reopening it but requiring some kind of rule, like requiring a picture or something significant about the number instead of just typing the number.6th said:Oh, do it...do it, and we could start over.![]()
![]()
833
I actually thought that I DID put us off for awhile (when I was trying to put us back on track)...6th said:Yeah, kingskings! skipped # 793 so we were off for quite awhile.
812
Filling in for the absent Mr. Slim, I do believe he'd agree with you that it's TIME to make some changes to this thread!C Diddy said:I wouldn't mind closing this thread and reopening it but requiring some kind of rule, like requiring a picture or something significant about the number instead of just typing the number.
834