Knowing our luck we finish 10th then lose both our picks when NO jumps into the top 3. Smh.
No way the Pelicans make top 3....but the Kings giving away their pick is absolutely disheartening, and a real possibility
Knowing our luck we finish 10th then lose both our picks when NO jumps into the top 3. Smh.
Lol!Yeah, but not McLemore. He's too old.
No way the Pelicans make top 3....but the Kings giving away their pick is absolutely disheartening, and a real possibility
First, good news, we are not losing our draft pick this year. Even going 4-1 we cannot be better than 9th spot which means that two teams have to jump over us to lose the pick. Chances of that are less than 0.3%.
Second, bad news, yes this win does suck from the lottery perspective.
Who wants to enjoy short term satisfaction of the win, power to you.
The price is that we are solidly at the 8th spot with one win against Mavs away from having a very good shot at the 9th slot in the draft.
With a win against the Mavs, we would have a winning record against both, Mavs and TWolves.
We also have the easiest schedule the rest of the way.
Wolves do not have to tank to go 1- 6 (Portland twice, GSW, Utah, OKC, Rockets, Lakers).
Mavs have easier schedule (Bucks, Kings, Clippers, Spurs, Suns, Denver and Memphis), but mostly away games. If they lose to us they are looking at 1-3 wins range.
We have the easiest games (Mavs, Lakers, Houston, Suns, Clippers). Win over Mavs gets us to 3 wins.
So is being hit by an asteroid the day before the draft.
Put Richardson out there and tell him just to walk up and down the court.There's this silly rule, though, that says we have to put 5 players on the floor. Who if not Ben?
I think this is a problem with the NBA and the way it runs its draft. Fans shouldn't be bummed when their team wins.Cannot be better than 9th - you mean draft position? Also I thought 4-1 is realistic, but 5-0 is a possibility. Other teams do not care except for seeding possibility. People are mentioning not playing the vets, but its really about playing whoever the weakest players are on the team the most minutes or lineups which are outmatched at positions on the floor. These utterly meaningless wins are costing the Kings PG selection in the draft. They will basically have leftovers selection, or worse trade up and take on bust-risk. Either way its myopic when 3-6 wins take considerable percentage points for the Kings, and with it potential selection. Big difference between 9/13 and 6/13 in terms of selection.
First, good news, we are not losing our draft pick this year. Even going 4-1 we cannot be better than 9th spot which means that two teams have to jump over us to lose the pick. Chances of that are less than 0.3%.
Second, bad news, yes this win does suck from the lottery perspective.
Who wants to enjoy short term satisfaction of the win, power to you.
The price is that we are solidly at the 8th spot with one win against Mavs away from having a very good shot at the 9th slot in the draft.
With a win against the Mavs, we would have a winning record against both, Mavs and TWolves.
We also have the easiest schedule the rest of the way.
Wolves do not have to tank to go 1- 6 (Portland twice, GSW, Utah, OKC, Rockets, Lakers).
Mavs have easier schedule (Bucks, Kings, Clippers, Spurs, Suns, Denver and Memphis), but mostly away games. If they lose to us they are looking at 1-3 wins range.
We have the easiest games (Mavs, Lakers, Houston, Suns, Clippers). Win over Mavs gets us to 3 wins.
I think this is a problem with the NBA and the way it runs its draft. Fans shouldn't be bummed when their team wins.
The Knicks trotted out a lineup of 5 undrafted rookies and also lost whats left of D Rose for the remainder of the season.
Do what we have been doing and deal with it after the lottery. It sucks but even if we tried our best tank job, how are we going to "compete" with the likes of what the Knicks are doing(sans the Rose injury)
The system is broken.
Why even walk? Don't even move; just stay out of the paint, so they can't call three seconds.Put Richardson out there and tell him just to walk up and down the court.
Cannot be better than 9th - you mean draft position? Also I thought 4-1 is realistic, but 5-0 is a possibility. Other teams do not care except for seeding possibility. People are mentioning not playing the vets, but its really about playing whoever the weakest players are on the team the most minutes or lineups which are outmatched at positions on the floor. These utterly meaningless wins are costing the Kings PG selection in the draft. They will basically have leftovers selection, or worse trade up and take on bust-risk. Either way its myopic when 3-6 wins take considerable percentage points for the Kings, and with it potential selection. Big difference between 9/13 and 6/13 in terms of selection.
Oh, why not? Give 'em full credit. While we contribute so many thousands of ideas, criticisms, expressions of despair, decisions, wonderful suggestions, with several dashes of praise, the ownership, FO, coaching staff are thinking, planning, deciding direction, discussing trade ideas, evaluating our players, other players, draft options, fan opinion, scouting reports, strategies in the draft, in other words, conspiring to get us the best damn team possible. So I know they are conspiring and I'm confident tha if they don't get where they want, it won't be for the lack smarts, effort or consping. I've got a good seat on the sidelines.
Then they should have known that they couldn't have pulled off a successful tank this year unless they traded DMC at the start. It made no sense to surround him with vets, only to try to tank with vets later in the year, especially after having survived the hardest part of the schedule. 1.5 games back when DMC was traded?That, to me, shows lack of smarts and effort, and they fully deserve the results of this "tank".
Then they should have known that they couldn't have pulled off a successful tank this year unless they traded DMC at the start. It made no sense to surround him with vets, only to try to tank with vets later in the year, especially after having survived the hardest part of the schedule. 1.5 games back when DMC was traded?That, to me, shows lack of smarts and effort, and they fully deserve the results of this "tank".
Why even walk? Don't even move; just stay out of the paint, so they can't call three seconds.
We were never going to be worse than Brooklyn, Phoenix and LA. Our best-case draft scenario would have been sharing the 4/5 spots with Philadelphia. That way if we do get a top three pick and have to swap, we only fall down to 5 where we miss out on Fultz, Ball, and Jackson but still have a lot of great options left to choose from at either SF or PG. We were actually on pace for exactly that scenario but these last 3 wins have allowed the Knicks to leapfrog us meanwhile Orlando keeps doing just enough to lose games. While we won two 1 point games they lost to Boston by a point and lost an overtime game to OKC. Most likely they take the best SF on the board but what if they go PG instead? The problem now is that we could lose a tie-breaker with Minnesota and pick 8th overall where we might miss out on Fox and Ntilikina. That's why this matters. At 5 you may have your choice of PGs and at 8 you might not get any of them. Maybe it won't matter but it feels like self-sabotage to me.
The Dallas game is really a MUST LOSE now!!!![]()
We were never going to be worse than Brooklyn, Phoenix and LA. Our best-case draft scenario would have been sharing the 4/5 spots with Philadelphia. That way if we do get a top three pick and have to swap, we only fall down to 5 where we miss out on Fultz, Ball, and Jackson but still have a lot of great options left to choose from at either SF or PG. We were actually on pace for exactly that scenario but these last 3 wins have allowed the Knicks to leapfrog us meanwhile Orlando keeps doing just enough to lose games. While we won two 1 point games they lost to Boston by a point and lost an overtime game to OKC. Most likely they take the best SF on the board but what if they go PG instead? The problem now is that we could lose a tie-breaker with Minnesota and pick 8th overall where we might miss out on Fox and Ntilikina. That's why this matters. At 5 you may have your choice of PGs and at 8 you might not get any of them. Maybe it won't matter but it feels like self-sabotage to me.
We were never going to be worse than Brooklyn, Phoenix and LA. Our best-case draft scenario would have been sharing the 4/5 spots with Philadelphia. That way if we do get a top three pick and have to swap, we only fall down to 5 where we miss out on Fultz, Ball, and Jackson but still have a lot of great options left to choose from at either SF or PG. We were actually on pace for exactly that scenario but these last 3 wins have allowed the Knicks to leapfrog us meanwhile Orlando keeps doing just enough to lose games. While we won two 1 point games they lost to Boston by a point and lost an overtime game to OKC. Most likely they take the best SF on the board but what if they go PG instead? The problem now is that we could lose a tie-breaker with Minnesota and pick 8th overall where we might miss out on Fox and Ntilikina. That's why this matters. At 5 you may have your choice of PGs and at 8 you might not get any of them. Maybe it won't matter but it feels like self-sabotage to me.