Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
Wow what is the distribution?
Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
Hate to be that guy, CD, but the only guy to really manage to come back from an Achilles and not look too dismissed is KD and a lot of that is because he’s 6’11” with a huge wingspan and also a top 20 player all time.
There’s a reason people decided the Celtics window was shut the second Tatum’s Achilles went.
Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
two time NBA champion Alex Caruso
They probably need to wait for the swelling to go down, so it may be a couple of days yet.
2025: #15, #24Wow what is the distribution?
That is 100% what they should do. They built up all those picks to shoot their shot, and Giannis is that shot, for sure.Yeah, we better hope they just don't decide "You know what, a SGA+Giannis window for the next 5 years sounds good" and just pile those picks into Giannis. Even if they had to deal Jdub or Chet, they'd be able to easily get Giannis package done.
Arenas said Tatum and Dame both had calf tightness prior to their respective injuries. Vecenie said teams will likely be more conservative with those injuries but what are players/teams supposed to do in the playoffs?
It’s an awkward one because both the team and player will want the best chance to win game seven and the championship. However, if there was a concern that this could be an Achilles injury, or it’s a warning signing that could lead to one, then should the player have a scan before they decide whether he plays or not? I presume that a scan would reveal if there’s something wrong?Arenas said Tatum and Dame both had calf tightness prior to their respective injuries. Vecenie said teams will likely be more conservative with those injuries but what are players/teams supposed to do in the playoffs?
The only issue with putting it in the player’s court is that most will play and not take their health into consideration. They’ll see it as their chance to lead their team to glory and will potentially feel they won’t get another or a better chance. The injury might happen, but it might not happen. So they’ll take the risk and that can have a big knock on effect to them and their longevity, but also impact the team long term due to not being available.I say let the players eventually decide but before that, mention that there are potential risk for further injury and extended time missed as a consequence that they will have to live with
The only issue with putting it in the player’s court is that most will play and not take their health into consideration. They’ll see it as their chance to lead their team to glory and will potentially feel they won’t get another or a better chance. The injury might happen, but it might not happen. So they’ll take the risk and that can have a big knock on effect to them and their longevity, but also impact the team long term due to not being available.
The character they show in that decision would be subjective. On the one hand, some will see a decision to play as brave and committed because they are prioritising winning a championship, while others will see the decision as foolish and irresponsible because they are not considering the risks and long term impact. On the other hand, not playing could be considered weak and not committed because they are throwing away the chance at a championship, while others will see them as smart and sensible for considering the long term picture.absolutely most will still choose to play because it will show their character which is why I would have them sit down with a physician and the front office and discuss the potential consequences leaving no regrets or contempt towards the franchise
Yeah, we better hope they just don't decide "You know what, a SGA+Giannis window for the next 5 years sounds good" and just pile those picks into Giannis. Even if they had to deal Jdub or Chet, they'd be able to easily get Giannis package done.
For the entire playoffs, Hali had by far the highest cumulative plus/minus of any Pacer at +132. Surprisingly, McConnell was at -34. Mathurin was the lowest at -76. As talented as he is, his BBIQ is not great; prefers contested shots to wide open ones.Whether or not the Pacers should have played Hali in game 7... it was definitely a no-win situation. And it was an extremely tough call for both the player and the franchise. With parity ruling the day across the NBA and Indiana punching above their weight a bit, there is simply no guarantee that they make it back to the Finals. Last year, Porzingas basically tossed what remains of his health away to compete in the Finals, and Boston won the title, in no small part thanks to his contribution. It was worth it.
Of course, Haliburton is much younger, and has much more of his career ahead of him in which to win a title than Porzingas did last year. You don't want to torpedo his health rashly. Hindsight is 20/20, and again, it's such a tough call. But what I'm actually most surprised by is how effective Indiana was without Tyrese. I'm not going to make some sort of outlandish claim that they're better off without their star PG and undisputed leader, but he doesn't seem quite as important to team success as I had imagined. They weren't likely to win with Haliburton playing hobbled, and they certainly weren't going to win with him completely sidelined, but they fought and scraped and kept OKC nervous until the final five minutes of a win-or-go-home situation. I thought Tyrese would need to have the series of his life in order for Indiana to take it to 6 games. I don't know how long his calf issue was affecting him before the Achilles injury, but regardless, he wasn't his normal highly-effective/hyper-efficient self for most of his minutes on the court in the series, and the Pacers still took OKC to 7 games.
My other takeaway from these Finals is that OKC looked shockingly vulnerable for a 68-win squad from the Western Conference. Their stagnant offense needs some help; too often they depend on SGA and Jalen Williams to create something out of nothing, and their all-world defense sputtered at times to contain the Pacers' fast-paced attack. I also don't think Chet is quite ready to be the two-way force they need him to be if they're going to compete for titles year after year. That said, it would not surprise me in the least if the Thunder tried their hands at the following:
Even though OKC won the title, the fact that they did not do so convincingly is somehow more terrifying to me than if they had dominated Indiana the way I expected. As you say, they may decide to throw their incredible trade asset muscle around and give themselves a more complete shot at owning the next half-decade of NBA basketball.
The character they show in that decision would be subjective. On the one hand, some will see a decision to play as brave and committed because they are prioritising winning a championship, while others will see the decision as foolish and irresponsible because they are not considering the risks and long term impact. On the other hand, not playing could be considered weak and not committed because they are throwing away the chance at a championship, while others will see them as smart and sensible for considering the long term picture.
It’s a no win situation because the player almost has to play as they’d be dealing with negative press and attention for what would be perceived to be letting the team, city (etc) down, rather than praised for making a smart decision to value their long term health.