Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
Wow what is the distribution?
Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
Hate to be that guy, CD, but the only guy to really manage to come back from an Achilles and not look too dismissed is KD and a lot of that is because he’s 6’11” with a huge wingspan and also a top 20 player all time.
There’s a reason people decided the Celtics window was shut the second Tatum’s Achilles went.
Let's not forget that OKC are not only the champions, but they own up to 16 first round picks in the next 7 drafts.
two time NBA champion Alex Caruso
They probably need to wait for the swelling to go down, so it may be a couple of days yet.
2025: #15, #24Wow what is the distribution?
That is 100% what they should do. They built up all those picks to shoot their shot, and Giannis is that shot, for sure.Yeah, we better hope they just don't decide "You know what, a SGA+Giannis window for the next 5 years sounds good" and just pile those picks into Giannis. Even if they had to deal Jdub or Chet, they'd be able to easily get Giannis package done.
Arenas said Tatum and Dame both had calf tightness prior to their respective injuries. Vecenie said teams will likely be more conservative with those injuries but what are players/teams supposed to do in the playoffs?
It’s an awkward one because both the team and player will want the best chance to win game seven and the championship. However, if there was a concern that this could be an Achilles injury, or it’s a warning signing that could lead to one, then should the player have a scan before they decide whether he plays or not? I presume that a scan would reveal if there’s something wrong?Arenas said Tatum and Dame both had calf tightness prior to their respective injuries. Vecenie said teams will likely be more conservative with those injuries but what are players/teams supposed to do in the playoffs?
The only issue with putting it in the player’s court is that most will play and not take their health into consideration. They’ll see it as their chance to lead their team to glory and will potentially feel they won’t get another or a better chance. The injury might happen, but it might not happen. So they’ll take the risk and that can have a big knock on effect to them and their longevity, but also impact the team long term due to not being available.I say let the players eventually decide but before that, mention that there are potential risk for further injury and extended time missed as a consequence that they will have to live with
The only issue with putting it in the player’s court is that most will play and not take their health into consideration. They’ll see it as their chance to lead their team to glory and will potentially feel they won’t get another or a better chance. The injury might happen, but it might not happen. So they’ll take the risk and that can have a big knock on effect to them and their longevity, but also impact the team long term due to not being available.
The character they show in that decision would be subjective. On the one hand, some will see a decision to play as brave and committed because they are prioritising winning a championship, while others will see the decision as foolish and irresponsible because they are not considering the risks and long term impact. On the other hand, not playing could be considered weak and not committed because they are throwing away the chance at a championship, while others will see them as smart and sensible for considering the long term picture.absolutely most will still choose to play because it will show their character which is why I would have them sit down with a physician and the front office and discuss the potential consequences leaving no regrets or contempt towards the franchise