Twix said:This was actually a pretty exciting game. I thought that Damon Jones 3 was the biggest play. Don't think Spurs lead after that?
Yeah, that's the play.6th said:If you are talking about the fast break where the ball came in to Shaq and he quickly (almost a touch pass) kicked it out to Damon who nailed the 3......then I agree.
doone said:Spurs lost, Timberwolves lost, Lakers lost, its a good day for the Kings.![]()
And Kings do!!!! Yay!!Bballkingsrock said:Now all they need to do is top it off with a win vs Boston.
Dave McNulla said:the biggest weakness is finishing the close games.
as it currently stands, they couldn't meet until the wcf. do you believe the kings will get there? i think they could, but the suns will be a heck of a hill to climb. of course, the standings at this point are never the standings in the end.LPKingsFan said:This is why I am curious should the Kings and Spurs ever meet in the playoffs. The Kings, while known for lacking a killer instinct and giving up leads, have for better or worse been in a lot of close games recently. I think the experience of having to produce so much in crunch time will only produce benefits in the playoffs, and this could be a key intangible when the Kings face the Spurs in the WCF.
Dave McNulla said:as it currently stands, they couldn't meet until the wcf. do you believe the kings will get there? i think they could, but the suns will be a heck of a hill to climb. of course, the standings at this point are never the standings in the end.
i only look at the loss column after midseason. spurs and suns have 12 losses, so i figure spurs win on tie-breakers.LPKingsFan said:If the Suns hold off the Spurs for the 1st seed, after we beat Dallas as the 4th/5th, we would face the Suns, which, as Brick says, would not be all that tough of a matchup in a 7 game playoff series for us, I dont think. The Spurs beat Memphis or Houston in the 1st round, then Seattle in the 2nd and boom, there we have it, a WCF for the ages. Minus a 2002-esque, or Feburary 2004-esque for that matter, conspiracy I think the Kings would have as good a chance as anyone to take out the Spurs in a 7 game series.
Then it'd be off to Miami...
Dave McNulla said:i only look at the loss column after midseason. spurs and suns have 12 losses, so i figure spurs win on tie-breakers.
i think the suns would be a tough matchup for anyone in a seven game series. i think the kings could win if they played defense. you got webber, but his one-on-one D is good for the half court game. he's not stopping amare in a sprint. somebody has to stop nash. he's their engine. i don't know who on the kings is going to do that. they tradied doug christie for cuttino mobley. cat's not going to do that.
i think the spurs biggest achiles heal is half court offense when team's bunch up in the middle. it's gives tim a hard time and the perimeter players can't drive. that leaves jump shots. if the spurs make 'em, they win. but i can see the kings being able to play that sort of defense against the spurs.
the other achiles heal, or should i say ankle, is tim duncan's health. he's played fewer minutes than ever and seems to be hurting. spurs may have to trade some seeding for health, and give tim a rest.