this is very true, only problem is for that to happen we would need a coach that actually runs any type of offense at all. there are more Pick N Rolls performed at pick up games during lunch break at a middle school
And there's the rub. Get a middle school coach in here and have them run pick and roll every play and we're already a better team. It worked for Mike Bibby's Kings. With the right players it's still the hardest play to guard in basketball.
I don't know what makes you think that. Rebounding almost always translates to the NBA. Good college rebounders turn into good pro rebounders, and poor college rebounders turn into poor pro rebounders. To my understanding it is the single most translatable stat.
Yes and no. In general I would agree with you -- if you have a wing player who averages a lot of rebounds in college they will probably also average a lot of rebounds in the NBA, provided they get enough playing time. But there's a critical point at which the height factor starts to skew the stats. Most college teams have one player who is tall enough to play PF in the NBA. The elite teams will have two or maybe three. That means that you don't necessarily need good technique to rack up rebounds in the college game if you're at or near that 6'9" cut off point. Size isn't necessarily a good indicator of rebounding prowess. But you do need to have technique -- reading the angles, getting in good position, boxing out, pursuing loose balls relentlessly. If you're a player who relies on size rather than technique in college, than you might have a problem transitioning to the NBA game where size will be negated. Michael Beasley and David West are recent examples. Elite rebounders in college, nothing special in the NBA.
But I don't really think those criticisms apply to Thomas Robinson. He played next to a 7 footer and he played against top level competition and he led the entire NCAA in defensive rebounds by a wide margin. I think he just needs time. He'll learn to slow down and play to his strengths.
Last edited: