Darth Divac
Bench
'Nuff said.
Peja, who averaged 20.8 points on 45% shooting in eight years with us? Who finished fourth in MVP voting in 2004? Gee, I really wonder why we'd retire his jersey. Such a conundrum.
Peja, who averaged 20.8 points on 45% shooting in eight years with us? Who finished fourth in MVP voting in 2004? Gee, I really wonder why we'd retire his jersey. Such a conundrum.
Peja, who averaged 20.8 points on 45% shooting in eight years with us? Who finished fourth in MVP voting in 2004 and had 3 All-Star appearances, all in Sacramento? And Mike, who averaged 17 points and 5.4 assists in 7 years with us, while hitting a game-winner in the 2002 WCF run? Gee, I really wonder why we'd retire their jerseys. Such a conundrum.
Peja, who averaged 20.8 points on 45% shooting in eight years with us? Who finished fourth in MVP voting in 2004 and had 3 All-Star appearances, all in Sacramento? And Mike, who averaged 17 points and 5.4 assists in 7 years with us, while hitting a game-winner in the 2002 WCF run? Gee, I really wonder why we'd retire their jerseys. Such a conundrum.
You don't retire the jerseys of every good player who passes through town. Soon you'd be out of numbers entirely and it makes the honor meaningless. Number retirements are for the giants. HOFs or close with the occasional special case like Vlade. The "So and so and the Sacramento Kings" guys. Those guys were never the franchise, here or elsewhere.
IMO, the only jersey's worthy of retirement in the Sacramento era were Mitch Richmond and Chris Webber.
With all due respect to Mr. Divac (and this site's own VF21) I don't feel he was worthy of jersey retirement and it set precedent wherein guy like Peja and Bibby appear just as worthy, if not more.
Why Richmond and Webber? Despite neither winning a title and despite Richmond mostly playing on a bad team, they are widely recognized and acknowledged as the 2 best players the franchise has ever had during the Sacramento era.
Webber was unequivocally the best player on all those 50, 60+ win teams that came within an eyelash of winning an NBA title (yes, I confidently assume the Kings destroy New Jersey had they beaten LA). At his peak in Sacramento, Webber was arguably one of the top 5 players in the league. No other Sacramento Kings player can say that.
Richmond put the Kings on the map. He was their first all-star. He won the 1995 All-Star MVP. He's one of only a few players to average over 21+ ppg the first 10 years of his career. During his peak in Sacramento, he was widely regarded as one of the best SG's in the NBA behind only Michael Jordan and, possibly, Clyde Drexler. Jordan has stated numerous times that Mitch defended him as well, if not better, than anyone he played against.
Why not Divac, Peja and Bibby? They were never the best player on their teams. They didn't make the same impact on the franchise as Webber and Richmond did. Peja and Bibby had longer tenures with the team and may have accumulated more franchise related stats, but they weren't stars of the team. Without Webber, the Kings were a very good playoff team, but not a title contender. Without Richmond, the Kings never get Webber.
IMO, the only jersey's worthy of retirement in the Sacramento era were Mitch Richmond and Chris Webber.
With all due respect to Mr. Divac (and this site's own VF21) I don't feel he was worthy of jersey retirement and it set precedent wherein guy like Peja and Bibby appear just as worthy, if not more.
Why Richmond and Webber? Despite neither winning a title and despite Richmond mostly playing on a bad team, they are widely recognized and acknowledged as the 2 best players the franchise has ever had during the Sacramento era.
Webber was unequivocally the best player on all those 50, 60+ win teams that came within an eyelash of winning an NBA title (yes, I confidently assume the Kings destroy New Jersey had they beaten LA). At his peak in Sacramento, Webber was arguably one of the top 5 players in the league. No other Sacramento Kings player can say that.
Richmond put the Kings on the map. He was their first all-star. He won the 1995 All-Star MVP. He's one of only a few players to average over 21+ ppg the first 10 years of his career. During his peak in Sacramento, he was widely regarded as one of the best SG's in the NBA behind only Michael Jordan and, possibly, Clyde Drexler. Jordan has stated numerous times that Mitch defended him as well, if not better, than anyone he played against.
Why not Divac, Peja and Bibby? They were never the best player on their teams. They didn't make the same impact on the franchise as Webber and Richmond did. Peja and Bibby had longer tenures with the team and may have accumulated more franchise related stats, but they weren't stars of the team. Without Webber, the Kings were a very good playoff team, but not a title contender. Without Richmond, the Kings never get Webber.
IMO, the only jersey's worthy of retirement in the Sacramento era were Mitch Richmond and Chris Webber.
With all due respect to Mr. Divac (and this site's own VF21) I don't feel he was worthy of jersey retirement and it set precedent wherein guy like Peja and Bibby appear just as worthy, if not more.
Why Richmond and Webber? Despite neither winning a title and despite Richmond mostly playing on a bad team, they are widely recognized and acknowledged as the 2 best players the franchise has ever had during the Sacramento era.
Webber was unequivocally the best player on all those 50, 60+ win teams that came within an eyelash of winning an NBA title (yes, I confidently assume the Kings destroy New Jersey had they beaten LA). At his peak in Sacramento, Webber was arguably one of the top 5 players in the league. No other Sacramento Kings player can say that.
Richmond put the Kings on the map. He was their first all-star. He won the 1995 All-Star MVP. He's one of only a few players to average over 21+ ppg the first 10 years of his career. During his peak in Sacramento, he was widely regarded as one of the best SG's in the NBA behind only Michael Jordan and, possibly, Clyde Drexler. Jordan has stated numerous times that Mitch defended him as well, if not better, than anyone he played against.
Why not Divac, Peja and Bibby? They were never the best player on their teams. They didn't make the same impact on the franchise as Webber and Richmond did. Peja and Bibby had longer tenures with the team and may have accumulated more franchise related stats, but they weren't stars of the team. Without Webber, the Kings were a very good playoff team, but not a title contender. Without Richmond, the Kings never get Webber.