should #4 be retired?

Should #4 be retired?

  • Yes, #4 will defintely be retired

    Votes: 87 71.9%
  • Maybe, #4 should be retired

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • No, #4 will not be retired

    Votes: 20 16.5%
  • Maybe, #4 shouldn't be retired

    Votes: 3 2.5%

  • Total voters
    121
#34
I voted "no", but I guess I don't really know enough about the Kings' standards for retiring a number to have an good sense for whether this will realistically occur. How many other jerseys are hanging in the rafters?
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#35
4cwebb said:
I voted "no", but I guess I don't really know enough about the Kings' standards for retiring a number to have an good sense for whether this will realistically occur. How many other jerseys are hanging in the rafters?
They retired Mitch Richmond's, that's all you have to know. Makes Webber an absolute automatic as the main man in the golden years.
 
#36
Bricklayer said:
They retired Mitch Richmond's, that's all you have to know. Makes Webber an absolute automatic as the main man in the golden years.
Fair point. Using those guidelines, I'd change my vote.
 
#38
4cwebb said:
How many other jerseys are hanging in the rafters?
#1 for "tiny" Archibald
#6 for fans being the sixth man
#11 for Bobby Davies
#12 for Maurice Stokes
#14 for Oscar Robertson
#27 for Jack Twyman
#44 Sam Lacey
#2 for Mitch Richmond (as said by Brick)

soon to follow: #21 for Vlade and #4 for C-Webb

i may be missing a few retired numbers but don't scron me if i am wrong i appologize in advance.