Shams Bomb! Keon Ellis and Dennis Schroder traded to Cleveland in 3 team deal. Kings acquire De’Andre Hunter

We are what we are as a fanbase. Great fandom but bipolar emotionally. Same group who though Siakam would be a terrible fit. We’ve been screaming for length and shooting. We get it and still complain. We honestly don’t know what we want, we just want someone to get us playoff wins but can’t articulate how. Monte did us no favors with the string of undersized guards he drafted. The one big guard he drafts he trades away in what everyone outside of Sac considers one of the worst trades in recent history. Perry may end up being awful but Monte’s vision of constructing a team with smalls that can guard but can’t shoot, led by a 1 that couldn’t shoot, and a 4/5 that’s your hub that can’t shoot is why we’re at where we are.

Kings fans know what they want, they just need to realize that by the time they get it they won't really need it anymore unfortunately. At least not in a piece that's not really something you build a long term future with.
 
If anyone thinks we won the trade then they’re wrong

In one sentence you insult ellis as an undrafted over achiever but is wanted by 5-8 teams that are playoff bound. Then you praise Caldwell who is overachieving and was a undrafted player as well lol
It’s not insulting, they’re facts. We all love Ellis and Caldwell since they’ve achieved beyond what anyone expected. Hunter is still a better talent than Ellis. And height and length is something we’ve all been begging for. I wish the best for Ellis, but his 175lb frame tells me he won’t be anything more than a key role players. He is what contending teams need, not rebuilding teams
 
Man, we have some harsh critics on this here forum.

I am willing to wait this one out before passing final judgment. Because a move like this tells me that Scott wants to put his fingerprints all over the next reincarnation of the Sacramento Kings. While it's tough to see Keon leave, I can understand why Scott has decided to send him elsewhere.

Ideally, I would've loved to see a handful of picks coming our way, but at the end of the day, I am also "glad" to see Schroder get sent out, and I have no real opinion one way or the other on Saric.

It also gives us an opportunity to see Cardwell be featured more, and that is something I can live with.

I wish Keon well. I hope he excels in Cleveland.
 
We are what we are as a fanbase. Great fandom but bipolar emotionally. Same group who though Siakam would be a terrible fit. We’ve been screaming for length and shooting. We get it and still complain. We honestly don’t know what we want, we just want someone to get us playoff wins but can’t articulate how. Monte did us no favors with the string of undersized guards he drafted. The one big guard he drafts he trades away in what everyone outside of Sac considers one of the worst trades in recent history. Perry may end up being awful but Monte’s vision of constructing a team with smalls that can guard but can’t shoot, led by a 1 that couldn’t shoot, and a 4/5 that’s your hub that can’t shoot is why we’re at where we are.

This is weird and I see it often. The thing where you label the fans in a negative light, based on the opinions of the minority few.
 
Does a healthy Hunter start on this Kings team?
I pray not. No team is ever going to have a successful starting lineup with Hunter in it to disruptive when he misses chunks of the season. But is a bench player he makes some sense. I would’ve never given up Keon for him though.
 
Last edited:
Because if we stay at the 1 seed, our most likely pick is going to be Flemings. It is really really hard to get wing type players and we before this trade had a Grand Total of 1 long term full sized wing (Keegan). Now we have two of them.

We shall see how the rest of our roster plays out but guards are the easiest to replace versus forwards. The roster is more balanced going into the draft so we can take best player available and not have the cluster **** Monte created.

Hunter is a one year rental. He's solved nothing. Only now we have lost the best (or really only for all the minutes Carter is getting) defensive guard in the rotation. This is not a step forward, it's yet another Kings front office tripping and falling on their face and calling that the plan.
 
It’s not insulting, they’re facts. We all love Ellis and Caldwell since they’ve achieved beyond what anyone expected. Hunter is still a better talent than Ellis. And height and length is something we’ve all been begging for. I wish the best for Ellis, but his 175lb frame tells me he won’t be anything more than a key role players. He is what contending teams need, not rebuilding teams

You really envision Hunter fitting this potential rebuild? He would have fit nicely at the start of last season, in place of Barnes. Now? Doesn't make sense
 
I pray not. No team is ever going to have a successful starting lineup with Hunter in it to disruptive when he misses chunks of the season. But is a bench player he makes some sense. I would’ve never given up key on Ellis for him though.

Hunter is right up there talent wise with the Kings top guys. He's a true wing. Yeah, the health is what it is but he better be starting at some point. DeMar has to be next. There can't be zero market for him. If there isn't then GM's are flat stupid.
 
Someone fill me in. Why would we gripe about being longer and having an upper tier 3pt shooter? He’s 28 and can be a key dude in our rebuild
I have no issues with Hunter as a player. Maybe outside of injuries. Definitely a guy I wish the Kings got 2 years ago. Similar to players like Precious and Cardwell who were acquired two years too late.

I especially like him much better than Schroder. But I figured another move has to be coming. If not involving Hunter, than definitely DeRozan. Though I think Hunter might be a better trade piece.

I’m also not that salty about Keon. They burned that bridge as soon as they picked up a well below value option instead of paying him maybe 8 per for 2-3 more years, picking up Schroder who nobody wanted, and then proceeding to jerk his minutes around.
 
Maybe signing Shroder to a big contract, to then trade him away was the plan all along. Makes it easier matching salaries without having to add so much to the trade. I'm honestly cool with this. We have two legit wings now.

Ah, no. Haha. And if that was the goal the Kings wouldn't be the one clearing someone else's cap, giving up the younger player, and picks on top of it even if it's in name only. Perry boo-booed but just like Vlade, at least he tried to clean up the mess sooner than later.
 
Maybe signing Shroder to a big contract, to then trade him away was the plan all along. Makes it easier matching salaries without having to add so much to the trade. I'm honestly cool with this. We have two legit wings now.
It’s certainly a possibility. It always seems like if a team has salary space, it’s not a bad plan to sign a solid vet in order to move them to a contender in need. With that said, giving him a third year on the contract blew any potential to get something more juicy back.
 
We are giving yp 2029! Second! Round pick.

Get a grip yall. This is crazy. By all measures we won this trade. We got bigger and better for a free agent signing and Ellis.

Yall really expecting a 1st for Ellis? Whats he averaging 4 points?

Yall are crazy
This is ultimate cant win talk. Theze fans are ridiculous

Just like Zach LaVine for De'Aaron Fox was a win for us, right?
 
Hunter is right up there talent wise with the Kings top guys. He's a true wing. Yeah, the health is what it is but he better be starting at some point. DeMar has to be next. There can't be zero market for him. If there isn't then GM's are flat stupid.

If this is really the plan, Murray with Hunter is a mediocre wing tandem, if you're serious about it becoming a playoff contender. This is back to hoping to get through the play-in stuff
 
You really envision Hunter fitting this potential rebuild? He would have fit nicely at the start of last season, in place of Barnes. Now? Doesn't make sense
Yes. It’s as simple as evaluating future talent. Wings who can shoot over 40% are rare. Keegan did it for 1 season and we proclaimed him as a future all star. Hunter almost does that in 4 seasons in a row and now he’s not a fit. Guards similar to Keon are available every draft, often in the 2nd round. If we get a top 5 pick, it would be exciting to see him on the court at the same time as Keegan and Hunter. If it doesn’t work out after 2027, then we trade him to another team that needs length and shooting. Low risk imo
 
I guess if we were going to lose Ellis (knowing he wouldn't sign or wants too much money) then this deal isn't so bad. Getting rid of Schroeder is a positive. Not sure where Hunter fits in tho. I always thought we wanted a rim protecting PF and move Keegan back to the 3. I guess Hunter comes off the bench.
Cardwell is definitely a rim protecting PF/center
 
Ignoring Saric, who never played and is filler, we traded two smalls for a big (which everyone says is impossible) and if we truly lost the trade talent-wise, why is anyone thinking we'll get good enough to move out of last place significantly (bottom three teams all have the same odds for #1, right?)? I don't really know how good or bad Hunter is (I don't watch him play), but we're getting rid of Dennis which everyone wanted, badly.

We balanced the team roster a bit, which everyone was also clamoring for all year.

Losing Keon sucks - he was likely my son's favorite player on the team and I was really hoping they would be able to keep him. But if he was gone anyways (wanted too much salary, didn't want to be here, whatever), he was already gone. And I'm certainly not going to worry too much about the worst of 3 different team's second round picks in 3 years at this point.

I think this may be a step in the right direction for team building overall given the above.

Maybe it is our consolation prize with Golden State being pretty stupid about JK? Hard to know.
 
Yes. It’s as simple as evaluating future talent. Wings who can shoot over 40% are rare. Keegan did it for 1 season and we proclaimed him as a future all star. Hunter almost does that in 4 seasons in a row and now he’s not a fit. Guards similar to Keon are available every draft, often in the 2nd round. If we get a top 5 pick, it would be exciting to see him on the court at the same time as Keegan and Hunter. If it doesn’t work out after 2027, then we trade him to another team that needs length and shooting. Low risk imo

So he fits where this team currently is and "their timeline"?
 
We are what we are as a fanbase. Great fandom but bipolar emotionally. Same group who though Siakam would be a terrible fit. We’ve been screaming for length and shooting. We get it and still complain. We honestly don’t know what we want, we just want someone to get us playoff wins but can’t articulate how. Monte did us no favors with the string of undersized guards he drafted. The one big guard he drafts he trades away in what everyone outside of Sac considers one of the worst trades in recent history. Perry may end up being awful but Monte’s vision of constructing a team with smalls that can guard but can’t shoot, led by a 1 that couldn’t shoot, and a 4/5 that’s your hub that can’t shoot is why we’re at where we are.

Without Tyrese, Pascal Siakam's team is fighting with us for worst record in the league this season. That's not a terribly convincing demonstration of his hypothetical value to a competing Kings team. Certainly unworthy of taking a victory lap on those who didn't like the fit here.

Why are Kings fans upset about this team finally trading for a wing player? Because everything is contextual. I wanted a De'Andre Hunter trade two years ago before Vivek blew up the Beam Team. At this point, we would have been better off just re-signing Keon Ellis last summer instead. And why are you still ragging on Monte McNair about signing too many guards? Monte is responsible for the only winning Kings season in the last two decades. He had his limitations but his strategy clearly was not all bad.

And I know exactly what I want. A top10 defense and one elite scorer. That's the only formula that has ever led to consistent wins in the NBA. Keon could have contributed to the defensive part of that equation. Hunter undoubtedly will not. And given where Hunter is now in his career (28 years old with one playoff series win on his resume) and free agency one year away for him, we're likely to get about 10% of his effort as he counts the minutes until he's out of Sacramento. We're supposed to be building a franchise that winning players want to play for and instead we're building a franchise that everyone can't wait to escape from.
 
Ignoring Saric, who never played and is filler, we traded two smalls for a big (which everyone says is impossible) and if we truly lost the trade talent-wise, why is anyone thinking we'll get good enough to move out of last place significantly (bottom three teams all have the same odds for #1, right?)? I don't really know how good or bad Hunter is (I don't watch him play), but we're getting rid of Dennis which everyone wanted, badly.

We balanced the team roster a bit, which everyone was also clamoring for all year.

Losing Keon sucks - he was likely my son's favorite player on the team and I was really hoping they would be able to keep him. But if he was gone anyways (wanted too much salary, didn't want to be here, whatever), he was already gone. And I'm certainly not going to worry too much about the worst of 3 different team's second round picks in 3 years at this point.

I think this may be a step in the right direction for team building overall given the above.

Maybe it is our consolation prize with Golden State being pretty stupid about JK? Hard to know.
maybe that is the difference where many fans expect a more thorough rebuild but we will see a top pick rookie to try to win with the current team. I honestly hate this direction
 
So he fits where this team currently is and "their timeline"?
You keep saying timeline. We need to rebuild and rebuild fast. And the way to supercharge that is through this year’s draft. And have the right pieces with him in years 1 & 2. Maybe learn a thing or 2 from a 28yo “vet” like Hunter who was a major contributor for the Cavs in their playoff run (oh by the way he shot 46% from 3 in the playoffs last year). You rebuild when you surround top talent with the right complementary pieces. And if takes 3 years to get it right, fine. Pistons took 4 reasons to figure it out after drafting Cade. A few less years for OKC and Houston

Next step needs to be to get rid of LaVine, DDR, Westbrook. Anyone who wants to use our time to rebuild to build up their stat legacy, we need to jettison. And if we can get FRPs for Sabonis, pull that trigger too.
 
Also, where is the talk of the Kings being over the luxury tax by 13 million coming from? Spotrac has Hunters salary at 23 million and the Kings were already under weren't they?
I have no idea. According to Spotrac we're $1.7M under the tax threshold. That $13M number makes no sense at all, either for this year or for next year (where our current salaries are pushing the tax line, but we can be pretty confident that the DeRozan salary won't be on our books).
 
We really going to revisit this and compare a Keon Ellis trade to Fox? All I know is Fox is gonna have as much staying power with the Spurs as LaVine has with us.

My point is, sometimes the outrage is justified. There will always be fans who call every Kings trade a win. I get it, optimism feels better than outrage. I don't enjoy having to vet every stupid decision a Kings front office makes. I rather would prefer somebody competent were making these decisions instead and I could just cheer them on for their good work.

Hunter himself is not a terrible player, he's actually pretty good. But last place teams not even a full year into their rebuild don't trade for 28 year olds with one year left on their contract. We could have had Keon Ellis re-signed for the next 4 years. Keon was a legitimately valuable asset that Scott Perry just disappeared for no good reason. Unless we hit the lottery and are miraculously competing already next year, the sum total of Scott Perry's managing of the Keon Ellis contract situation was a long-term talent drain for a team that didn't have a lot of talent to give away in the first place.
 
You keep saying timeline. We need to rebuild and rebuild fast. And the way to supercharge that is through this year’s draft. And have the right pieces with him in years 1 & 2. Maybe learn a thing or 2 from a 28yo “vet” like Hunter who was a major contributor for the Cavs in their playoff run (oh by the way he shot 46% from 3 in the playoffs last year). You rebuild when you surround top talent with the right complementary pieces. And if takes 3 years to get it right, fine. Pistons took 4 reasons to figure it out after drafting Cade. A few less years for OKC and Houston

Next step needs to be to get rid of LaVine, DDR, Westbrook. Anyone who wants to use our time to rebuild to build up their stat legacy, we need to jettison. And if we can get FRPs for Sabonis, pull that trigger too.
If he's part of the plan to "rebuild fast", it's going to be another attempt at a shortcut that doesn't work. With the interest for Ellis around the league, I think they could have done better and instead added a draft pick
 
Without Tyrese, Pascal Siakam's team is fighting with us for worst record in the league this season. That's not a terribly convincing demonstration of his hypothetical value to a competing Kings team. Certainly unworthy of taking a victory lap on those who didn't like the fit here.

Why are Kings fans upset about this team finally trading for a wing player? Because everything is contextual. I wanted a De'Andre Hunter trade two years ago before Vivek blew up the Beam Team. At this point, we would have been better off just re-signing Keon Ellis last summer instead. And why are you still ragging on Monte McNair about signing too many guards? Monte is responsible for the only winning Kings season in the last two decades. He had his limitations but his strategy clearly was not all bad.

And I know exactly what I want. A top10 defense and one elite scorer. That's the only formula that has ever led to consistent wins in the NBA. Keon could have contributed to the defensive part of that equation. Hunter undoubtedly will not. And given where Hunter is now in his career (28 years old with one playoff series win on his resume) and free agency one year away for him, we're likely to get about 10% of his effort as he counts the minutes until he's out of Sacramento. We're supposed to be building a franchise that winning players want to play for and instead we're building a franchise that everyone can't wait to escape from.
Weird point on Siakam. He obviously fits well with Hali. I thought he would fit well with the beam team as a 2nd option. Which is what I was arguing for 2 years ago. Never said he would thrive as the primary option

We are where we are cuz of Monte’s choices. His strategy of building a team through offensively deficient undersized guards who are great at defense is a recipe for losing. You build championships through guards that can lead an offense and score, and with wings that can shoot and defend. Or if you have defensive minded guards, you better have elite wings or centers. He doubled down on a certain type. So we are where we are. And unfortunately we have to sacrifice some valuable pieces like Keon (who I don’t see as a rare building block) to help turn the Titanic around
 
Back
Top